Early and long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy in the very elderly: An 18-year single-center study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the perioperative (30-day) and long-term outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in elderly patients with severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid disease. Although the efficacy of CEA in preventing stroke in selected patients has been clearly demonstrated, concern has been expressed about the role of CEA in people over 80 years old.MethodsAn analysis was conducted on a prospectively compiled computerized database of all primary CEAs performed at our institution from 1990 to 2007. Descriptive demographic data, risk factors, surgical details, perioperative strokes and deaths, and other complications were recorded. All patients underwent postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning and clinical follow-up at one, six, and 12 months, and yearly thereafter. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier life-tables. Long-term relative survival after CEA was assessed against age- and gender-matched controls.ResultsIn all, 1769 CEAs were performed in 1562 patients, 193 of them (207 CEAs; group I) were ≥ 80 years old and 1371 were younger (1562 CEAs; group II). All CEA procedures were performed with patients under deep general anesthesia with continuous perioperative EEG monitoring for selective shunting. No strokes or deaths occurred in group I, whereas there were 11 perioperative strokes and three deaths in group II (1%). A complete follow-up (median, 5.2 years) was obtained in 185 elderly patients: no late occlusions or restenoses were detected, while the seven-year freedom from stroke and death were 96.6% and 52.4%, respectively. The relative seven-year survival rate was 99.8%.ConclusionsCEA in elderly patients proved safe and effective, with an excellent long-term durability. The long-term relative survival after CEA in elderly patients was better than in an age-and gender-matched population, so the likelihood of living long enough to benefit from CEA is not jeopardized by being very elderly

Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in elderly patients with hypertension: a 10-year follow-up analysis

The aim of the study was to assess the role of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) in the prediction of future cardiac events in elderly hypertensive patients and to investigate if its prognostic value is maintained during a 10-year follow-up period.A total of 229 consecutive patients a parts per thousand yen 65 years old (range 65-88 years) with arterial hypertension, who were referred to our institution for stress/rest Tc-99m-sestamibi MPS between January 2000 and November 2001, were followed up for 10-12 years. Cardiac death, myocardial infarction and a coronary revascularization procedure were considered as events. Survival curves were computed by the Kaplan-Meier method. A stepwise Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to identify predictors of events.Follow-up was completed in 221 (96.5 %) patients; 26 patients experienced cardiac death, 29 myocardial infarction and 51 coronary revascularization. Annual event rates for cardiac death, cardiac death/myocardial infarction and cardiac death/myocardial infarction/coronary revascularization were, respectively, 0, 0.2 and 0.4 % for patients with a normal scan and 1.5, 3.0 and 5.3 % after an abnormal MPS. Event-free survival was significantly different according to extent and severity of perfusion defects (all p < 0.01). An increase in global chi-square in predicting cardiac events occurred when MPS data were added to pre-scan information (from 47.28 to 88.87; p < 0.001).MPS provides incremental prognostic information for the prediction of cardiac events in elderly patients with hypertension. Subjects with a normal scan have an excellent 10-year outcome, and the risk of experiencing a cardiac event increases with extension and severity of stress perfusion defect

Diagnostic and prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography in low-risk patients with left bundle-branch block

Background The abnormal left ventricular activation pattern in patients with a left bundle-branch block (LBBB) frequently induces myocardial perfusion defects, decreasing the specificity of noninvasive coronary-risk stratification with stress testing. We assessed the diagnostic and prognostic impact of gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in low-risk patients with LBBB.Methods A total of 114 patients underwent dual-day protocol Tc-99m sestamibi gated SPECT and were divided into two subsets: without LBBB (group 1, n=57) and with LBBB (group 2, n=57). Sixty-eight (60%) patients had negative coronary angiography and 46 (40%) were at a low risk for coronary artery disease. The variables incorporating the extent and severity of perfusion defects were calculated: summed stress score, summed rest score and summed difference score, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean variations in EDV and ESV were computed as follows: rest volume - poststress volume. Cardiac events were classified as major and minor.Results Gated SPECT was positive in eight (14%) patients of group 1 and 33 (58%) patients of group 2 (P<0.001). The summed stress score was significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1 (4.7 +/- 4.8 vs. 0.9 +/- 1.8, P<0.001); similarly, EDV and ESV were significantly higher in LBBB patients (P<0.05 in both). The mean variation in EDV was -2.21 ml for group 1 and 1.32 ml for group 2 (P<0.05). After a mean follow-up period of 32 +/- 19 months, cardiac events occurred in 22 (23%) patients, six of group 1 and 16 of group 2 (12 vs. 35%, P<0.01).Conclusion Functional and perfusion parameters obtained by gated SPECT are different between patients with and without LBBB. In LBBB patients, the decrease in EDV between rest and poststress could be considered an early marker of diastolic dysfunction that might anticipate left ventricular ejection fraction reduction and may have an impact on prognosis. Nucl Med Commun 33:491-497 (C) 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Comparison between conventional imaging (abdominal-pelvic computed tomography and bone scan) and [18F]choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for the initial staging of patients with intermediate- tohigh-risk prostate cancer: A retrospective analysis

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of [18F]fluorocholine positron emis- sion tomography/computed tomography (FCH PET/CT) in detecting lymph-node and bone involvement in comparison with conventional imaging, such as abdominal\u2013pelvic CT and bone scan, in the initial staging of prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and methods. The study retro- spectively evaluated 48 patients who had FCH PET/CT for the initial staging of PCa. At the same time, 32 of the 48 patients had a bone scan and 26 of the 48 patients had abdominal\u2013pelvic diag- nostic CT. Diagnostic performance of FCH PET/CT, i.e. sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, was evaluated on a per-patient basis for the whole population and then separately on a per-risk clas- sification, and later in comparison with conventional imaging. Histological specimens or follow- up data were used as the standard of reference. Results. The overall accuracy of FCH PET/CT for lymph-node involvement was 83.3%. The sensitivity of FCH was higher in the high-risk subset (83.3%) than in the intermediate-risk group (33.3%), whereas FCH specificity was similar. In com- parison with dedicated CT scan, FCH PET/CT showed a higher sensitivity and a similar specificity (46.2% vs 69.2% and 92.3% vs 92.3%, respectively). Moreover, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT were higher than those of bone scan (100% vs 90% and 86.4% vs 77.2%, respectively). In contrast with conventional imaging, PET/CT changed the staging of the PCa in 33.3% patients. Conclusions. The efficiency of FCH PET/CT in detecting both bone and lymph-node involvement of PCa at initial staging was found to be higher than that of conventional imaging. Prospective clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings

Early versus delayed carotid endarterectomy after a nondisabling ischemic stroke: a prospective randomized study

Background. Although many retrospective and a few prospective studies have analyzed the outcome of early and delayed carotid endarterectomy (CEA) after a recent minor or nondisabling stroke (ie, a minimal and stabilized focal neurologic deficit of acute onset persisting for more than 24 hours and not leading to a handicap or to a significant impairment of daily living activities), the optimal timing of surgery remains uncertain. The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare the perioperative death and stroke rates of CEA performed within 30 days (early group) or more than 30 days (delayed group) after a nondisabling ischemic stroke in patients with carotid bifurcation disease. Methods. During a 4-year period, of 86 patients experiencing a minor stroke, 45 were randomized to undergo early CEA and 41 to undergo delayed CEA. All patients underwent preoperative cerebral computed tomography, duplex ultrasonographic scanning and angiography of the supra-aortic trunks. All CEAs were carotid eversion endarterectomies and were performed by the same surgeon, using deep general anesthesia, with continuous electroencephalographic monitoring for the selective shunting. The perioperative death and stroke rates were compared between the 2 groups. Results. No perioperative deaths occurred in either group. No recurrent strokes occurred during the waiting period in the delayed group. The incidence of perioperative stroke was comparable in the 2 groups (1 of 45, 2% vs 1 of 41, 2%). The mean follow-up was 23 months (range, 6 to 50 months). Survival rates after 1, 2, and 3 years were similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions. Early CEA after a nondisabling ischemic stroke can be performed safely with perioperative mortality and stroke rates comparable with those of delayed CEA. The timing of surgery does not seem to influence the benefit of the CEA

Carotid endarterectomy in women: Early and long-term results.

Background. Although many randomized trials and other multicenter studies have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in selected symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, including women, there is a remarkable lack of reports regarding the outcome of CEA with respect to sex. To analyze and compare the outcome of CEA in men and women in a single-group experience, we reviewed a consecutive series of 619 CEAs performed in 539 patients, 371 men (423 CEAs) and 168 women (196 CEAs). Methods. Data collection was retrospective up to August 1, 1992 and prospective for all 405 patients treated thereafter. Results. Women were significantly less likely than men to have overt evidence of coronary artery disease (P < .001) and had a significantly higher incidence of diabetes (P < .001). No perioperative death occurred in the female group (P = NS), and no statistical difference was found in perioperative stroke risk incidence. Women had a significantly higher incidence of late occlusive events (P = .01), which were all asymptomatic. No late stroke occurred in the female group (P = NS). Life-table cumulative survival rates at 1, 3, 5, and 7 years were 99.3%, 90.5%, 85.9%, and 82.3%, respectively, in women, and 98.9%, 91.9%, 85.2%, and 79.6% in men (log-rank P = .8). Conclusions. These findings show that perioperative stroke risk and mortality rates, as well as late strokefree, mortality, and recurrence rates, in patients undergoing CEA, are comparable in men and women. Further, larger comparative studies are necessary to provide more information on the benefit and durability of CEA in asymptomatic patients, but the results of this study suggest that the early and late outcomes are excellent and comparable in symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women