50 research outputs found

    Computation of the effective area and associated uncertainties of non-rotating piston gauges FPG and FRS

    Get PDF
    The effective areas of three force-balanced piston gauges (FPGs) and two Furness Rosenberg standards (FRS) in the operating pressure range of each device varying for 1 Pa–15 kPa have been accurately computed both in the gauge and absolute modes. Geometrical data for the non-rotating piston-cylinder assemblies (PCAs) have been provided by the National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) of PTB, RISE, INRiM and CMI. Since the flow is in a wide range of the Knudsen number, simulations have been based on the Batnagar–Gross–Krook (BGK) kinetic model equation, while the typical Dadson and CFD approaches have been complimentary applied only in the viscous regime. Furthermore, an uncertainty analysis has been performed. The effective area is strongly affected by the PCA geometry and the flow conditions, while its dependency on pressure may be different even for devices of the same type. The main source of uncertainty is the dimensional measurements of the piston and the cylinder, followed by the accommodation coefficient characterizing the gas-surface interaction, while the effect of other flow and modeling parameters is negligible. The total relative standard uncertainty of the effective area has been always found to be less than 1 · 10−5 indicating that pressure measurements of high accuracy can be ensured. Since the effective area is estimated based solely on computations the FPG and the FRS assemblies may be characterized as primary pressure standards

    Computer simulation of a 1.0 CPa piston-cylinder assembly using finite element analysis (FEA)

    Get PDF
    The paper reports a preliminary study of the behavior of a high performance controlledclearance piston gauge (CCPG) in the pressure range up to 1 GPa through finite elemental analysis (FEA). The details of the experimental haracterization of this CCPG has already been published (Yadav et al., 2007 [1]). We have already pointed out that the use of Heydemann–Welch (HW) model for the characterization of any CCPG, has some limitation due to the fact that the linear extrapolation of the cube root of the fall rate versus jacket pressure (v1/3–pj) curve is assumed to be independent of the rheological properties of the pressure transmitting fluids. The FEA technique addresses this problem through simulation and optimization with a standard ANSYS program where the material properties of the piston and cylinder, pressure dependent density and viscosity of the pressure transmitting fluid etc. are to be used as the input parameters. Thus it provides characterization of a pressure balance in terms of effective area and distortion coefficient of the piston and cylinder.The present paper describes the results obtained on systematic studies carried out on the effect of gap profile between piston and cylinder of this controlled-clearance piston gauge, under the influence of applied pressure (p) from 100 MPa to 1000 MPa, on the pressure distortion coefficient (k) of the assembly. The gap profile is also studied at different applied jacket pressure (pj) such that pj/p varied from 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5

    CaractĂ©risation mĂ©trologique d’une nouvelle rĂ©fĂ©rence de pression relative dans le domaine 1,5 Ă  50 MPa

    No full text
    La nouvelle rĂ©fĂ©rence de pression relative dans le domaine de 1,5 Ă  50 MPa est dĂ©finie Ă  partir de trois ensembles piston-cylindres (EPC). Ces ensembles de 50 kPa/kg (15,8 mm de diamĂštre) peuvent ĂȘtre utilisĂ©s en jeu contrĂŽlĂ© et sont adaptĂ©s pour ĂȘtre montĂ©s sur les balances de rĂ©fĂ©rence haute pression d’huile, Ă©quipĂ©es chacune d'un ensemble de masses de 1000 kg. La section effective du premier EPC a Ă©tĂ© dĂ©terminĂ©e par des mesures dimensionnelles avec une incertitude relative Ă©largie (k=2) estimĂ©e Ă  1,0 x 10−5, puis comparĂ©e aux autres ensembles. Par ailleurs, les rĂ©sultats dimensionnels ont Ă©tĂ© confirmĂ©s Ă  basse pression par comparaison directe avec la rĂ©fĂ©rence de 1 MPa. Les coefficients de dĂ©formation des ensembles piston-cylindre ont Ă©tĂ© dĂ©terminĂ©s expĂ©rimentalement avec un ensemble 200 MPa, et comparĂ©s aux valeurs thĂ©oriques calculĂ©es par la mĂ©thode des Ă©lĂ©ments finis (MEF). Le bilan d’incertitude sur la mesure de pression pour cette rĂ©fĂ©rence est prĂ©sentĂ©e. L’incertitude Ă©largie est estimĂ©e Ă  15 Pa + 1,2 x 10−5 x p

    Recent progress in high pressure metrology in Europe

    No full text
    Five European national metrology institutes in collaboration with a university, a research institute and five industrial companies are working on a joint research project within a framework of the European Metrology Research Programme aimed at development of 1.6 GPa primary and 1.5 GPa transfer pressure standards. Two primary pressure standards were realised as pressure-measuring multipliers, each consisting of a low pressure and a high pressure (HP) piston-cylinder assembly (PCA). A special design of the HP PCAs was developed in which a tungsten carbide cylinder is supported by two thermally shrunk steel sleeves and, additionally, by jacket pressure applied to the outside of the outer sleeve. Stress-strain finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to predict behaviour of the multipliers and a pressure generation system. With FEA, the pressure distortion coefficient was determined, taking into account irregularities of the piston-cylinder gap. Transfer pressure standards up to 1.5 GPa are developed on the basis of modern 1.5 GPa pressure transducers. This project shall solve a discrepancy between the growing needs of the industry demanding precise traceable calibrations of the high pressure transducers and the absence of adequate primary standards for pressures higher than 1 GPa in the European Union today
    corecore