Synonymous site conservation in the HIV-1 genome

Background: Synonymous or silent mutations are usually thought to evolve neutrally. However, accumulating recent evidence has demonstrated that silent mutations may destabilize RNA structures or disrupt cis regulatory motifs superimposed on coding sequences. Such observations suggest the existence of stretches of codon sites that are evolutionary conserved at both DNA-RNA and protein levels. Such stretches may point to functionally important regions within protein coding sequences not necessarily reflecting functional constraints on the amino-acid sequence. The HIV-1 genome is highly compact, and often harbors overlapping functional elements at the protein, RNA, and DNA levels. This superimposition of functions leads to complex selective forces acting on all levels of the genome and proteome. Considering the constraints on HIV-1 to maintain such a highly compact genome, we hypothesized that stretches of synonymous conservation would be common within its genome. Results: We used a combined computational-experimental approach to detect and characterize regions exhibiting strong purifying selection against synonymous substitutions along the HIV-1 genome. Our methodology is based on advanced probabilistic evolutionary models that explicitly account for synonymous rate variation among sites and rate dependencies among adjacent sites. These models are combined with a randomization procedure to automatically identify the most statistically significant regions of conserved synonymous sites along the genome. Using this procedure we identified 21 conserved regions. Twelve of these are mapped to regions within overlapping genes, seven correlate with known functional elements, while the functions of the remaining four are yet unknown. Among these four regions, we chose the one that deviates most from synonymous rate homogeneity for in-depth computational and experimental characterization. In our assays aiming to quantify viral fitness in both early and late stages of the replication cycle, no differences were observed between the mutated and the wild type virus following the introduction of synonymous mutations. Conclusions: The contradiction between the inferred purifying selective forces and the lack of effect of these mutations on viral replication may be explained by the fact that the phenotype was measured in single-cycle infection assays in cell culture. Such a system does not account for the complexity of HIV-1 infections in vivo, which involves multiple infection cycles and interaction with the host immune system

Embryonic Cells Redistribute SUMO1 upon Forced SUMO1 Overexpression

Embryonic stem (ES) cells exhibit unusual transcriptional, proteomic, and signal response profiles, reflecting their unusual needs for rapid differentiation and replication. The work reported here demonstrated that mouse embryonic cell lines did not tolerate the overexpression of SUMO1, the small ubiquitin-like modifier protein that is covalently attached to many substrates to alter their intracellular localization and functionality. Forced SUMO1 overexpression is toxic to ES cells, and surviving cell populations adapt by dramatically reducing the levels of free SUMO1. Such a response is not seen in differentiated cells or with SUMO2 or with nonconjugatable SUMO1 mutants or in the presence of a SUMO1 “sponge” substrate that accepts the modification. The findings suggest that excess SUMO1 modification of specific substrates is not tolerated by embryonic cells and highlight a distinctive need for these cells to control the levels of SUMO1 available for conjugation.Conjugation of small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs) to substrate proteins is a posttranslational protein modification that affects a diverse range of physiological processes. Global inhibition of SUMO conjugation in mice results in embryonic lethality, reflecting the importance of the SUMO pathways for embryonic development. Here, we demonstrated that SUMO1 overexpression was not well tolerated in murine embryonic carcinoma and embryonic stem (ES) cells and that only a few clones were recovered after transduction with vectors delivering SUMO1 expression constructs. Differentiated NIH/3T3 cells overexpress SUMO1 without deleterious effects and maintain high levels of both conjugated and free forms of SUMO1. The few embryonic cells surviving after forced overexpression retained all their SUMO1 in the form of a few high-molecular-weight conjugates and maintained undetectable levels of free SUMO1. The absence of free SUMO in embryonic cells was seen specifically upon overexpression of SUMO1, but not SUMO2. Moreover, blocking SUMO1 conjugation to endogenous substrates by C-terminal mutations of SUMO1 or by overexpression of a SUMO1 substrate “sponge” or by overexpression of the deSUMOylating enzyme SUMO-specific peptidase 1 (SENP1) dramatically restored free SUMO1 overexpression. The data suggest that overexpression of SUMO1 protein leading to an excess accumulation of critical SUMO1-conjugated substrates is not tolerated in embryonic cells. Surviving embryonic cells exhibit SUMO1 conjugation to allowed substrates but a complete absence of free SUMO1