5 research outputs found

    Autocrine saturation of pro-urokinase receptors on human A431cells

    No full text

    Inhibition of Sp1 activity by a decoy PNA-DNA chimera prevents urokinase receptor expression and migration of breast cancer cells

    No full text
    Sp1 regulates the activation of many genes involved in tumor growth, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. We have previously shown the involvement of Sp1 in the up-regulation of urokinase receptor (uPAR) expression, a key molecule in tumor invasion and metastasis. Here, we investigated whether a marked down-regulation of Sp1 activity may inhibit uPAR expression and migration ability of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. To this end, we tested the decoy ability of a novel peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-DNA chimera which carries a central DNA strand, containing Sp1-binding sequence, covalently linked to two PNA fragments at both ends (PNA-DNA-PNA, PDP). The chimera was synthesized, annealed with complementary DNA (PDP-DNA), and then tested for its ability to bind Sp1 both in vitro and in living MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells in the presence of urokinase (uPA). This PDP-DNA decoy molecule efficiently competes for the binding to endogenous Sp1 in nuclear extracts, and upon transfection with liposomal vectors, causes a marked decrease of available Sp1 in both untreated and uPA-treated MDA-MB-231 cells. Accordingly, both uPA-dependent enhancement of uPAR expression and cell migration were strongly reduced in transfected cells. Interestingly, a detectable inhibitory effect is also observed in breast cancer cells exposed to PDP-DNA in the absence of transfection reagents. Finally, the inhibitory effect of PDP-DNA appeared to be stronger than that observed with oligonucleotides carrying Sp1 consensus sequence. Our findings show that this novel PNA-DNA chimera, containing Sp1 consensus sequence, effectively inhibits Sp1 activity, uPAR expression, and motility of breast cancer cells indicating its potential therapeutic use to prevent tumor dissemination

    Single amino Acid substitutions in the chemotactic sequence of urokinase receptor modulate cell migration and invasion.

    No full text
    The receptor for urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPAR) plays an important role in controlling cell migration. uPAR binds urokinase and vitronectin extracellular ligands, and signals in complex with transmembrane receptors such as Formyl-peptide Receptors (FPR)s and integrins. Previous work from this laboratory has shown that synthetic peptides, corresponding to the uPAR(88-92) chemotactic sequence, when carrying the S90P or S90E substitutions, up- or down-regulate cell migration, respectively. To gain mechanistic insights into these opposite cell responses, the functional consequences of S90P and S90E mutations in full-length uPAR were evaluated. First, (HEK)-293 embryonic kidney cells expressing uPAR(S90P) exhibit enhanced FPR activation, increased random and directional cell migration, long-lasting Akt phosphorylation, and increased adhesion to vitronectin, as well as uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. In contrast, the S90E substitution prevents agonist-triggered FPR activation and internalization, decreases binding and adhesion to vitronectin, and inhibits uPAR/vitronectin receptor association. Also, 293/uPAR(S90P) cells appear quite elongated and their cytoskeleton well organized, whereas 293/uPAR(S90E) cells assume a large flattened morphology, with random orientation of actin filaments. Interestingly, when HT1080 cells co-express wild type uPAR with uPAR S90E, the latter behaves as a dominant-negative, impairing uPAR-mediated signaling and reducing cell wound repair as well as lung metastasis in nude mice. In contrast, signaling, wound repair and in vivo lung metastasis of HT1080 cells bearing wild type uPAR are enhanced when they co-express uPAR(S90P). In conclusion, our findings indicate that Ser(90) is a critical residue for uPAR signaling and that the S90P and S90E exert opposite effects on uPAR activities. These findings may be accommodated in a molecular model, in which uPAR(S90E) and uPAR(S90P) are forced into inactive and active forms, respectively, suggesting important implications for the development of novel drugs targeting uPAR function

    Review

    No full text
    corecore