Emissions by aerial routes from protected crop systems (greenhouses and crops grown under cover) : a position paper

This report describes the processes that may lead to emission of Plant Protection Products (PPP) from protected cultivation, through aerial routes. The introduction gives the background for this work and the limitations, outlining in particular why receptors other than air are not explicitly addressed here. Chapters 2 discusses the physical background of greenhouse air exchanges and the factors that affect it. Existing models for estimating ventilation of the different types of greenhouses are reviewed there. Chapter 3 gives a scientific argument about the processes and the factors that may affect aerial emissions of PPP from protected cultivations. The parameters that may have an high impact on the emission are identified there as well. A review of the knowledge needed and of the models that may be available for scoring each emission route is given in Chapter 4. In Chapter 5 a strategy is proposed to reduce/group the number of factors that are important (and to score their relevance) through some model calculations. An outline of the calculations that would be needed for ranking and eventually scoring the emissions and, possibly, highlight groupings of combinations that are similar with respect to emissions, is given

Steering of fogging: control of humidity: temperature or transpiration

Fogging systems are increasingly used to cool greenhouses and prevent water stress. More recently, fogging systems are applied also in relatively low radiation environments (such as The Netherlands), for a better control of product quality than whitewashing and to reduce need for natural ventilation ¿ thus allowing for higher CO2 concentrations to be maintained in the greenhouse. Most commonly the steering of such systems is done by setting an upper limit to the deficit of specific humidity that, whenever exceeded, triggers the fogging system. In both cases, however, one may wonder whether static and pre-fixed set points are the most effective choice. In the experiment presented in this paper, fogging and venting were controlled with the purpose of steering crop transpiration. The desired transpiration rate was the input of an algorithm that calculated on-line the required humidity and air temperature set points in view of the current weather factors. The set points were then the input of a standard P-controller that calculated vent opening and time of operation of the fogging system. In this paper, the resulting climate and actuator control operations are discussed and compared with a similar greenhouse controlled in a traditional fashion. The study concluded that a desired crop transpiration rate (an all-round indicator of crop well-being) could be used to select dynamic set points for the climate control in a greenhouse equipped with a fogging system

High temperature control in mediterranean greenhouse production: The constraints and the options

In the open field, the environment is a critical determinant of crop yield and produce quality and it affects the geographical distribution of most crop species. In contrast, in protected cultivation, environmental control allows the fulfillment of the actual needs depending on the technological level. The economic optimum, however, depends on the trade-off between the costs of increased greenhouse control and increase in return, dictated by yield quantity, yield quality and production timing. Additional constraints are increasingly applied for achieving environmental targets. However, the diverse facets of greenhouse technology in different areas of the world will necessarily require different approaches to achieve an improved utilization of the available resources. Although advanced technologies to improve resource use efficiency can be developed as a joint effort between different players involved in greenhouse technology, some specific requirements may clearly hinder the development of common “European” resource management models that, conversely should be calibrated for different environments. For instance, the quantification and control of resource fluxes can be better accomplished in a relatively closed and fully automated system, such as those utilized in the glasshouse of Northern-Central Europe, compared to Southern Europe, where different typologies of semi-open/semi-closed greenhouse systems generally co-exist. Based on these considerations, innovations aimed at improving resource use efficiency in greenhouse agriculture should implement these aspects and should reinforce and integrate information obtained from different research areas concerning the greenhouse production. Advancing knowledge on the physiology of high temperature adaptation, for instance, may support the development and validation of models for optimizing the greenhouse system and climate management in the Mediterranean. Overall, a successful approach will see horticulturists, plant physiologists, engineers and economists working together toward the definition of a sustainable greenhouse system

Water use efficiency of tomatoes - in greenhouses and hydroponics

Massive amounts of water are required for the production of our food, varying from several cubic metres per kilogram of beef to as low as 4 litres per kilogram for tomatoes grown in high-tech glasshouses. This article presents data on Product Water Use (PWU) of some foods and discusses how the water requirement for fresh tomatoes can be brought down from 300 to 4 litres/kg

Greenhouse technology for sustainable production in mild winter climate areas: Trends and needs

Greenhouse production in the near future will need to reduce significantly its environmental impact. For this purpose, elements such as the structure, glazing materials, climate equipments and controls have to be developed and wisely managed to reduce the dependence on fossil fuels, achieve maximum use of natural resources such as solar radiation and water, and minimize the input of chemicals and fertilizers. This paper discusses the most relevant developments in greenhouse technology for mild winter climates. Regarding greenhouse structures, recent studies based on computational fluid dynamics have been conducted to investigate the effect of parameters such as ventilator size and arrangement, roof slope and greenhouse width and height on the air exchange rate. Next generation greenhouses are expected to incorporate some of the innovations derived from recent ventilation studies. Covering crops with screens is becoming a common practice. Main advantages and limitations of screenhouses are discussed in this paper. Thermal storage is increasingly applied in closed or semi-closed greenhouses. Under some conditions semi-closed greenhouses could mitigate day/night while reducing the use of water and the entrance of pest. Photo selective films that reflect a fraction of NIR radiation are effective at lowering greenhouse temperature and, in some cases, may be cost effective. NIR reflective films have side effects of major importance in greenhouse production. The CO2 enrichment strategy in computer-controlled greenhouses is based on determining the benefits of increasing the CO2 concentration against the cost of it. No clear strategies have been defined for the application of CO2 in unheated greenhouses, where most of the time the source of carbon dioxide is the external air. Some authors suggest ventilating as little as possible and fertilizing with bottled carbon dioxide at least up to the external concentration. Improving greenhouses by introducing new technologies may have an additional impact on the environment. From an environmental point of view, the incorporation of technology needs to increase yield to compensate for its associated environmental burden. Previous results have shown that forced ventilation and heating are the main reasons for the increase in environmental impact in climate controlled greenhouses. Additional results on the area of technology and its associated impact are discussed in this pape

Cover materials excluding Near Infrared radiation: what is the best strategy in mild climates?

Only about half of the energy that enters a greenhouse as sun radiation is in the wavelength range that is useful for photosynthesis (PAR, Photosynthetically Active Radiation). Nearly all the remaining energy fraction is in the Near InfraRed range (NIR) and only warms the greenhouse and crop and does contribute to transpiration, none of which is necessarily always desirable. Materials or additives for greenhouse covers that reflect a fraction of the NIR radiation have recently become commercially available. Besides lowering greenhouse temperature, a NIR-excluding cover has quite a few side-effects that may become quite relevant in the passive or semi-passive greenhouses typical of mild climates. For instance, the ratio of assimilation to transpiration (the water use efficiency) should increase. On the other hand, by lowering the ventilation requirement, such a cover may hinder in-flow of carbon dioxide, thereby limiting the photosynthesis rate. In addition, there are obviously conditions where the warming up caused by NIR may be desirable rather than a nuisance. NIR-reflecting materials are becoming available in forms that are suitable for various types of applications, such as permanent, seasonal or mobile. By means of a simulation study, we discuss in this paper the best form of application in relation to the external climate and climate management options availabl

Effects of anti-transpirants on transpiration and energy use in greenhouse cultivation

Greenhouse production in North-West Europe consumes a lot of energy. The energy is needed for heating the greenhouse and controlling air humidity. Transpiration of a crop increases the energy use. The aim of this study was to explore the possibilities for the application of anti-transpirants to save energy by reducing crop transpiration without reducing crop yield. Literature and model calculations were used to explore the effects of increased leaf resistances on transpiration, energy use and production in tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper. In literature a large number of compounds are described that act as anti-transpirant. A two to five fold increase in stomatal resistance can be expected from treatment with anti-transpirants. Model calculations for tomato showed that increasing the stomatal resistance (from 2 to 5 times) throughout the whole year leads to substantial yield reduction: crop growth was reduced by 6-19%, while transpiration by 15-42% and consequently energy use by 9-16%. However, in the winter period (beginning of October/end of March) the growth reduction was only 0.3-1.3%, as in this period light levels are low and CO2 concentrations in the greenhouse are relatively high. Raising the (maximum) set-point for CO2 concentration from 1000 ppm to 3000 ppm, increased the actual concentration during day-time from 892 to 1567 ppm (flue gases were the only source of CO2). When the application of anti-transpirants was combined with raising the set-point for CO2 concentration, the model showed no growth reduction due to the application of anti-transpirants, while the annual energy use was reduced by 5.5-10.4% in tomato. Similar results were obtained for sweet pepper (5-9% energy saving) and cucumber (2-5% energy saving). These model calculations show that increasing stomatal resistance by anti-transpirants during the winter period may potentially save a substantial amount of energy (2-10%), without affecting yield of vegetables such as tomato, cucumber and sweet pepper. It is concluded that increasing the stomatal resistance by anti-transpirants in wintertime may lead to substantial energy saving due to the reduced transpiration and need for humidity management, without yield reduction. Such model calculations are useful to analyse beforehand the chances of a good combination of energy saving and yield loss of a possible application. Experiments will be needed to verify the result