Residual peripheral blood CD26+leukemic stem cells in chronic myeloid leukemia patients during TKI therapy and during treatment-free remission

Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients in sustained “deep molecular response” may stop TKI treatment without disease recurrence; however, half of them lose molecular response shortly after TKI withdrawing. Well-defined eligibility criteria to predict a safe discontinuation up-front are still missing. Relapse is probably due to residual quiescent TKI-resistant leukemic stem cells (LSCs) supposedly transcriptionally low/silent and not easily detectable by BCR-ABL1 qRT-PCR. Bone marrow Ph+ CML CD34+/CD38− LSCs were found to specifically co-express CD26 (dipeptidylpeptidase-IV). We explored feasibility of detecting and quantifying CD26+ LSCs by flow cytometry in peripheral blood (PB). Over 400 CML patients (at diagnosis and during/after therapy) entered this cross-sectional study in which CD26 expression was evaluated by a standardized multiparametric flow cytometry analysis on PB CD45+/CD34+/CD38− stem cell population. All 120 CP-CML patients at diagnosis showed measurable PB CD26+ LSCs (median 19.20/μL, range 0.27–698.6). PB CD26+ LSCs were also detectable in 169/236 (71.6%) CP-CML patients in first-line TKI treatment (median 0.014 cells/μL; range 0.0012–0.66) and in 74/112 (66%), additional patients studied on treatment-free remission (TFR) (median 0.015/μL; range 0.006–0.76). Notably, no correlation between BCR-ABL/ABLIS ratio and number of residual LSCs was found both in patients on or off TKIs. This is the first evidence that “circulating” CML LSCs persist in the majority of CML patients in molecular response while on TKI treatment and even after TKI discontinuation. Prospective studies evaluating the dynamics of PB CD26+ LSCs during TKI treatment and the role of a “stem cell response” threshold to achieve and maintain TFR are ongoing

Second generation proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma

6nononeBortezomib was the first proteasome inhibitor (PI) discovered and demonstrated great efficacy in myeloma, both in vitro and in patients. However, still many patients ultimately relapse and there is the need for novel therapies. A second generation of PI have been discovered, potentially more effective ands some also orally administered. Carfilzomib is an irreversible proteasome inhibitor that showed great efficacy in clinical studies. Ixazomib is an oral compound that has been introduced recently in the therapeutic spectrum. Novel agents such as Marizomib seem promising in the fact that can also pass through the blood brain barrier and maybe effective also in CNS muyeloma. This review focus on all proteasome inhibitors available in clinics and the new ones coming soon. © 2017, Bentham Science Publishers.noneGozzetti, Alessandro; Papini, Giulia; Candi, Veronica; Brambilla, Corrado Zuanelli; Sirianni, Santina; Bocchia, MonicaGozzetti, Alessandro; Papini, Giulia; Candi, Veronica; Brambilla, Corrado Zuanelli; Sirianni, Santina; Bocchia, Monic

High CD200 expression is associated with poor prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia, even in FlT3-ITD-/NPM1+ patients

Overexpression of CD200, a trans-membrane protein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). As few data are available in the subset of cytogenetically-normal (CN) AML, we retrospectively evaluated the correlations between CD200 expression and response to therapy in a series of 139 adults with CN-AML. CD200 was expressed in 67/139 (48%) cases; 18 of them (28%) expressed CD200 at high intensity. No differences in CD200 expression rate were observed according to age, WBC count, type of leukemia, FLT3 or NMP1 mutation, and CD56 expression. A higher incidence of CD200 expression was observed in CD34+ cases (P < 0.0001) and in BCL2+ patients (P = 0.04). Complete remission (CR) was evaluable achieved in 98 patients (70%): 56/71 (79%) in CD200- and 47/67 (63%) in CD200+ patients (P = 0.03), with a lower CR rate in patients with high CD200 intensity (9/18, 50%). CD200 expression had a negative impact on long-term outcome. CD200 expression, per se, did not impact on disease-free survival (DFS), but cases with high CD200 expression had a lower 3-year DFS compared to CD200-negative and low-expressing ones (0% vs 65% vs 68%, P = 0.019). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 51% in CD200- and 27% in CD200+ patients (P = 0.01), with a significant difference among cases with low or high CD200 expression (35% vs 0%, P = 0.001). CD200 high expression defined a group with very poor DFS and OS also among the 37 FLT3-/NPM1+: 3-year DFS and OS were 88% and 60% in CD200-, 50% and 32% in CD200 low and 0% and 0% in CD200 high patients, respectively (P = 0.01 for DFS and P = 0.05 for OS). Our data suggest a negative impact of CD200 expression in CN-AML, with a further worsening in high-expressing cases, also in the subset of FLT3-/NPM1+ patient

High CD200 expression is associated with poor prognosis in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia, even in FlT3-ITD-/NPM1+ patients

Overexpression of CD200, a trans-membrane protein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, has been associated with poor prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). As few data are available in the subset of cytogenetically-normal (CN) AML, we retrospectively evaluated the correlations between CD200 expression and response to therapy in a series of 139 adults with CN-AML. CD200 was expressed in 67/139 (48%) cases; 18 of them (28%) expressed CD200 at high intensity. No differences in CD200 expression rate were observed according to age, WBC count, type of leukemia, FLT3 or NMP1 mutation, and CD56 expression. A higher incidence of CD200 expression was observed in CD34+ cases (P < 0.0001) and in BCL2+ patients (P = 0.04). Complete remission (CR) was evaluable achieved in 98 patients (70%): 56/71 (79%) in CD200- and 47/67 (63%) in CD200+ patients (P = 0.03), with a lower CR rate in patients with high CD200 intensity (9/18, 50%). CD200 expression had a negative impact on long-term outcome. CD200 expression, per se, did not impact on disease-free survival (DFS), but cases with high CD200 expression had a lower 3-year DFS compared to CD200-negative and low-expressing ones (0% vs 65% vs 68%, P = 0.019). Three-year overall survival (OS) was 51% in CD200- and 27% in CD200+ patients (P = 0.01), with a significant difference among cases with low or high CD200 expression (35% vs 0%, P = 0.001). CD200 high expression defined a group with very poor DFS and OS also among the 37 FLT3-/NPM1+: 3-year DFS and OS were 88% and 60% in CD200-, 50% and 32% in CD200 low and 0% and 0% in CD200 high patients, respectively (P = 0.01 for DFS and P = 0.05 for OS). Our data suggest a negative impact of CD200 expression in CN-AML, with a further worsening in high-expressing cases, also in the subset of FLT3-/NPM1+ patients

Clinical impact of CD200 expression in patients with acute myeloid leukemia and correlation with other molecular prognostic factors

CD200, a protein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily, has been associated with a poor prognosis in lymphoproliferative disorders and in acute leukemia. We studied the expression of CD200 in a series of 244 patients with diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), to evaluate its impact on outcome and its possible association with other known prognostic factors. CD200 was found in 136/244 (56%) patients, in 41 of whom (30%) with high intensity of expression (MFI ≥ 11). CD200 was more frequent in secondary compared to de novo leukemia (p = 0.0006), in CD34 positive cases (p = 0.00001), in Bcl2 overexpressing cases (p = 0.01), in those wild-type Flt3 (p = 0.004) and with favorable or unfavorable compared to intermediate karyotype (p = 0.0003). CD200+ patients have a two-fold lower probability to attain complete remission, both in univariate (p = 0.006) and multivariate (p = 0.04) analysis. The negative impact of CD200 was found also in overall survival (p = 0.02) and was correlated with the intensity of expression of the molecule (p = 0.024). CD200 has an additive negative impact on survival in patients with unfavorable cytogenetic (p = 0.046) and in secondary leukemia (p = 0.05), and is associate with a worsening of outcome in patients with favorable biological markers, such as mutated NPM (p = 0.02), wild-type Flt3 (p = 0.034), negativity of CD34 (p = 0.03) and of CD56 (p = 0.03). In conclusion, CD200 is emerging as both a prognostic factor and a potential target of novel therapeutic approaches for AML, aiming to reverse the “do not eat me” signal of CD200 or to manipulate the suppressive immune microenvironment induced by CD200 binding to its receptor