Developing consensus on core outcome sets of domains for acute, the transition from acute to chronic, recurrent/episodic, and chronic pain: results of the INTEGRATE-pain Delphi process

This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this recordData sharing statement: Individual participant data that was collected throughout the research process from Delphi participants is not available to others. De-identified participant data was aggregated for analysis and presented in an anonymized format through tables in the article and supplement. All other research data is unavailable.Background: Pain is the leading cause of disability worldwide among adults and effective treatment options remain elusive. Data harmonization efforts, such as through core outcome sets (COS), could improve care by highlighting cross-cutting pain mechanisms and treatments. Existing pain-related COS often focus on specific conditions, which can hamper data harmonization across various pain states. Methods: Our objective was to develop four overarching COS of domains/subdomains (i.e., what to measure) that transcend pain conditions within different pain categories. We hosted a meeting to assess the need for these four COS in pain research and clinical practice. Potential COS domains/subdomains were identified via a systematic literature review (SLR), meeting attendees, and Delphi participants. We conducted an online, three step Delphi process to reach a consensus on domains to be included in the four final COS. Survey respondents were identified from the SLR and pain-related social networks, including multidisciplinary health care professionals, researchers, and people with lived experience (PWLE) of pain. Advisory boards consisting of COS experts and PWLE provided advice throughout the process. Findings: Domains in final COS were generally related to aspects of pain, quality of life, and physical function/activity limitations, with some differences among pain categories. This effort was the first to generate four separate, overarching COS to encourage international data harmonization within and across different pain categories. Interpretation: The adoption of the COS in research and clinical practice will facilitate comparisons and data integration around the world and across pain studies to optimize resources, expedite therapeutic discovery, and improve pain care. Funding: Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Join Undertaking; European Union Horizon 2020 research innovation program, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) provided funding for IMI-PainCare. RDT acknowledges grants from Esteve and TEVA.European Union Horizon 202

ADP is the Dominant Controller of AMPactivated Protein Kinase Activity Dynamics in Skeletal Muscle during Exercise

Exercise training elicits profound metabolic adaptations in skeletal muscle cells. A key molecule in coordinating these adaptations is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), whose activity increases in response to cellular energy demand. AMPK activity dynamics are primarily controlled by the adenine nucleotides ADP and AMP, but how each contributes to its control in skeletal muscle during exercise is unclear. We developed and validated a mathematical model of AMPK signaling dynamics, and then applied global parameter sensitivity analyses with data-informed constraints to predict that AMPK activity dynamics are determined principally by ADP and not AMP. We then used the model to predict the effects of two additional direct-binding activators of AMPK, ZMP and Compound 991, further validating the model and demonstrating its applicability to understanding AMPK pharmacology. The relative effects of direct-binding activators can be understood in terms of four properties, namely their concentrations, binding affinities for AMPK, abilities to enhance AMPK phosphorylation, and the magnitudes of their allosteric activation of AMPK. Despite AMP’s favorable values in three of these four properties, ADP is the dominant controller of AMPK activity dynamics in skeletal muscle during exercise by virtue of its higher concentration compared to that of AMP

Differences in cisplatin‐induced mechanical allodynia in male and female mice

BackgroundChemotherapeutic agents, such as cisplatin, are known to induce a persistent polyneuropathy. The mechanisms underlying the development of this pain are complex, and have only been investigated rodent models using male animals, despite an equivalent presentation of neuropathy between the sexes, clinically.MethodsMale and female C57Bl/6, Tlr3(-/-) Tlr4(-/-) , Myd88(-/-) , Trif(lps2) and Myd88(-/-) /Trif(lps2) mice received 6 i.p. injections of cisplatin (2.3 mg/kg/day) every other day over the course of 2 weeks. Changes in tactile threshold were monitored during this time, continuing through day 23, using von Frey filaments.ResultsMale WT mice develop a persistent tactile allodynia resulting from cisplatin administration. Female mice develop an initial allodynia, but thresholds return to baseline by day 23. Deletion of TLR3, TLR4, MyD88 and Trif/MyD88 protects animals from the development of cisplatin-induced polyneuropathy, and there are no sex differences. Trif(lps2) male mice show a persistent tactile allodynia following cisplatin administration, while female mice show a reduced allodynia, and remain higher in threshold than their male counterparts. On day 18, animals were given the analgesic gabapentin, and thresholds were tested 45 min after. Gabapentin was effective in transiently reversing mechanical allodynia in those mice with lowered thresholds.ConclusionsIt is important to continue examining both sexes in various pain models, as a mononeuropathy and polyneuropathy show sex differences in pain development and the role of TLR signalling