Computerized respiratory sounds can differentiate smokers and non-smokers

Cigarette smoking is often associated with the development of several respiratory diseases however, if diagnosed early, the changes in the lung tissue caused by smoking may be reversible. Computerised respiratory sounds have shown to be sensitive to detect changes within the lung tissue before any other measure, however it is unknown if it is able to detect changes in the lungs of healthy smokers. This study investigated the differences between computerised respiratory sounds of healthy smokers and non-smokers. Healthy smokers and non-smokers were recruited from a university campus. Respiratory sounds were recorded simultaneously at 6 chest locations (right and left anterior, lateral and posterior) using air-coupled electret microphones. Airflow (1.0–1.5 l/s) was recorded with a pneumotachograph. Breathing phases were detected using airflow signals and respiratory sounds with validated algorithms. Forty-four participants were enrolled: 18 smokers (mean age 26.2, SD = 7 years; mean FEV1 % predicted 104.7, SD = 9) and 26 non-smokers (mean age 25.9, SD = 3.7 years; mean FEV1 % predicted 96.8, SD = 20.2). Smokers presented significantly higher frequency at maximum sound intensity during inspiration [(M = 117, SD = 16.2 Hz vs. M = 106.4, SD = 21.6 Hz; t(43) = −2.62, p = 0.0081, d z = 0.55)], lower expiratory sound intensities (maximum intensity: [(M = 48.2, SD = 3.8 dB vs. M = 50.9, SD = 3.2 dB; t(43) = 2.68, p = 0.001, d z = −0.78)]; mean intensity: [(M = 31.2, SD = 3.6 dB vs. M = 33.7,SD = 3 dB; t(43) = 2.42, p = 0.001, d z = 0.75)] and higher number of inspiratory crackles (median [interquartile range] 2.2 [1.7–3.7] vs. 1.5 [1.2–2.2], p = 0.081, U = 110, r = −0.41) than non-smokers. Significant differences between computerised respiratory sounds of smokers and non-smokers have been found. Changes in respiratory sounds are often the earliest sign of disease. Thus, computerised respiratory sounds might be a promising measure to early detect smoking related respiratory diseases

An acoustical respiratory phase segmentation algorithm using genetic approach

10.1007/s11517-009-0518-0Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing479941-95

Investigation of obstructive sleep apnea using nonlinear mode interations in nonstationary snore signals

Acoustic studies on snoring sounds have recently drawn attention as a potential alternative to polysomnography in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This paper investigates the feasibility of using nonlinear coupling between frequency modes in snore signals via wavelet bicoherence (WBC) analysis for screening of OSA. Two novel markers (PF1 and PSF), which are frequency modes with high nonlinear coupling strength in their respective WBC spectrum, are proposed to differentiate between apneic and benign snores in same- or both-gender snorers. Snoring sounds were recorded from 40 subjects (30 apneic and 10 benign) by a hanging microphone, and subsequently preprocessed within a wavelet transform domain. Forty inspiratory snores (30 as training and 10 as test data) from each subject were examined. Results demonstrate that nonlinear mode interactions in apneic snores are less self-coupled and usually occupy higher and wider frequency ranges than that of benign snores. PF1 and PSF are indicative of apneic and benign snores (p < 0.0001), with optimal thresholds of PF1 = 285 Hz and PSF = 492 Hz (for both genders combined), as well as sensitivity and specificity values between 85.0 and 90.7%, respectively, outperforming the conventional diagnostic indicator (spectral peak frequency, PF = 243-275 Hz, sensitivity = 77.7-79.7%, specificity = 72.0-78.0%, p < 0.0001). Relationships between apnea-hypopnea index and the proposed markers could likely take the functional form of exponential or power. Perspectives on nonlinear dynamics analysis of snore signals are promising for further research and development of a reliable and inexpensive diagnostic tool for OSA