COVID-19 associated coagulopathy and thromboembolic disease: commentary on an interim expert guidance

Thrombosis and Hemostasi

Lipid levels and risk of venous thrombosis: results from the MEGA-study

Thrombosis and Hemostasi

The joint effect of genetic risk factors and different types of combined oral contraceptives on venous thrombosis risk

It is not known whether the synergistic effect of genetic markers, increasing the risk of venous thrombosis (VT), and combined oral contraceptives (COC) use varies between different types of progestogens in these preparations. We investigated the joint effect of genetic risk factor, that is, F5 rs6025, F2 rs1799963, and FGG rs2066865 mutations, and different progestogens on the risk of VT. The constrained maximum likelihood estimation (CMLE) method was used to calculate joint effects, expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals [CI]. As the dose of estrogen is known to be a risk factor for VT, analyses were restricted to COC with 30 mu g estrogen and each progestogen. Overall, the joint effect of COC and genetic variants was lowest for COC containing the progestogen levonorgestrel, albeit CIs were wide. The OR (95% CI) of the four different analyses (i.e. joint effect with F5 rs6025, F2 rs1799963, F5 rs6025 or F2 rs1799963 and FGG rs2066865) ranged between 7 center dot 4 (5 center dot 4-10 center dot 2) and 24 center dot 8 (12 center dot 3-50 center dot 0) for levonorgestrel. For gestodene the joint effect ranged between 11 center dot 7 (7 center dot 2-19 center dot 1) and 30 center dot 9 (10 center dot 6-89 center dot 9). Desogestrel and cyproterone acetate had the highest risk estimates: 14 center dot 6 (9 center dot 7-21 center dot 9) and 32 center dot 6 (13 center dot 2-80 center dot 6) and 15 center dot 5 (9 center dot 7-24 center dot 9) and 44 center dot 4 (16 center dot 9-116 center dot 3) respectively. In women with inherited thrombophilia, COC containing levonorgestrel were associated with the lowest risk of VT, albeit the CIs were wide.Thrombosis and Hemostasi

Effect of gender-affirming hormone use on coagulation profiles in transmen and transwomen

Background The transgender population that uses gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is rapidly growing. The (side) effects of GAHT are largely unknown. We examined the effect of GAHT on coagulation parameters associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk.Methods Factor (F)II, FIX, FXI, protein (p)C and free pS, fibrinogen, hematocrit, sex hormone-binding globulin, and normalized activated protein C ratio were measured in 98 transwomen (male sex at birth, female gender identity) and 100 transmen (female sex at birth, male gender identity) before and after 12 months of GAHT (oral or transdermal estradiol and anti-androgens in transwomen, transdermal or intramuscular testosterone in transmen). Mean paired differences in coagulation measurements were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Differences for route of administration and age were assessed with linear regression.Results After GAHT, transwomen had more procoagulant profiles with a mean increase in FIX: 9.6 IU/dL (95% CI 3.1-16.0) and FXI: 13.5 IU/dL (95% CI 9.5-17.5), and a decrease in pC: -7.7 IU/dL (95% CI -10.1 to -5.2). Changes in measures of coagulation were influenced by route of administration (oral vs. transdermal) and age. A higher sex-hormone binding globulin level after 12 months was associated with a lower activated protein C resistance. In transmen, changes were not procoagulant overall and were influenced by age. Differences for route of administration (transdermal vs. intramuscular) were small.Conclusions GAHT in transmen was not associated with apparent procoagulant changes, which provides some reassurance regarding VTE risk. In transwomen, GAHT resulted in procoagulant changes, which likely contributes to the observed increased VTE risk.Clinical epidemiolog

Optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy after myocardial infarction

AbstractObjectives.This study attempted to determine the optimal intensity of anticoagulant therapy in patients after myocardial infarction.Background.Treatment with oral anticoagulant therapy entails a delicate balance between over- (risk of bleeding) and under-anticoagulant (risk of thromboemboli). The optimal intensity required to prevent the occurrence of either event (bleeding or thromboembolic) is not known.Methods.A method was used to determine the optimal intensity of anticoagulant therapy by calculating incidence rates for either event associated with a specific international normalized ratio. The numerator included events occurring at given international normalized ratios, and the denominator comprised the total observation time.Results.The study population included 3,404 myocardial infarction patients enrolled in the ASPECT (anticoagulants in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis) trial. Total treatment was 6,918 patient-years. Major bleeding occurred in 57 patients (0.8/100 patient-years), and thromboembolic complications in 397 (5.7/100 patient-years). The incidence of the combined outcome (bleeding or thromboembolic complications) with international normalized ratio < 2 was 8.0/100 patient-years (283 events in 3,559 patient-years), with international normalized ratios between 2 and 3, 3.9/100 patient-years (33 events in 838 patient-years); 3.2/100 patient-years (57 events in 1,775 patient-years) for international normalized ratios between 3 and 4; 6.6/100 patient-years (37 events in 564 patient-years) for international normalized ratios between 4 and 5; and 7.7/100 patient-years (14 events in 182 patient-years) for international normalized ratios >5. After adjustment for achieved international normalized ratio levels, significant predictors were higher levels of systolic blood pressure and age.Conclusions.If equal weight is given to hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications, these results suggest that the optimal intensity of long-term anticoagulant therapy for myocardial infarction patients lies between 2.0 and 4.0 international normalized ratio, with a trend to suggest an optimal intensity of 3.0 to 4.0

Population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks after hip and knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis to inform patients in clinical practice: a competing risk analysis from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

Background and purpose - A lifetime perspective on revision risks is needed for optimal timing of arthroplasty in osteoarthritis (OA) patients, weighing the benefit of total hip arthroplasty/total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) against the risk of revision, after which outcomes are less favorable. Therefore, we provide population-based 10-year cumulative revision risks stratified by joint, sex, fixation type, and age.Patients and methods - Data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) was used. Primary THAs and TKAs for OA between 2007 and 2018 were included, except metal-on-metal prostheses or hybrid/reversed hybrid fixation. Revision surgery was defined as any change of 1 or more prosthesis components. The 10-year cumulative revision risks were calculated stratified by joint, age, sex, at primary arthroplasty, and fixation type (cemented/uncemented), taking into account mortality as a competing risk. We estimated the percentage of potentially avoidable revisions assuming all OA patients aged < 75 received primary THA/TKA 5 years later while keeping age-specific 10-year revision risks constant.Results - 214,638 primary THAs and 211,099 TKAs were included, of which 31% of THAs and 95% of TKAs were cemented. The 10-year cumulative revision risk varied between 1.6% and 13%, with higher risks in younger age categories. Delaying prosthesis placement by 5 years could potentially avoid 23 (3%) THA and 162 (17%) TKA revisions.Interpretation - Cumulative 10- year revision risk varied considerably by age in both fixation groups, which may be communicated to patients and used to guide timing of surgery.Clinical epidemiolog

Measurement of coagulation factors during rivaroxaban and apixaban treatment: Results from two crossover trials

Clinical epidemiolog

Glucocorticoid use and risk of first and recurrent venous thromboembolism: self-controlled case-series and cohort study

Glucocorticoid treatment increases venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. Whether this is due to the medication or the underlying disease, or affects the risk of VTE recurrence, has been difficult to determine. The aim of our present study was to quantify the risk for first and recurrent VTE associated with oral glucocorticoids use, considering the underlying disease. A total of 2547 patients with VTE from the Multiple Environmental and Genetic Assessment of Risk Factors for Venous Thrombosis (MEGA) study were linked to the Dutch Pharmaceutical Statistics register. The risk of first VTE during periods of exposure with oral glucocorticoids was estimated by the self-controlled case series method and that of recurrent VTE was examined in a cohort design. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) of first VTE in the period of glucocorticoid treatment was 3 center dot 51 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2 center dot 55-4 center dot 80]. This IRR was 2 center dot 53 (95% CI 1 center dot 10-5 center dot 72) in the week before treatment started, 5 center dot 28 (95% CI 2 center dot 89-9 center dot 53) in the first 7 days of treatment, remained elevated afterwards and decreased to 1 center dot 55 (95% CI 0 center dot 85-3 center dot 12) after 6 months, as compared to unexposed periods. The hazard ratio for recurrence was 2 center dot 72 (95% CI 1 center dot 64-4 center dot 78) in treatment periods as compared with no treatment. The increased risk of VTE associated with oral glucocorticoid treatment is due to a combined effect of the treatment and the underlying disease, remaining high during the first months of prescription.Clinical epidemiolog