20 research outputs found

    Metahistorical Scepticism in Aleksei Goldenveizer’s Chronicle of Everyday Life in Kyiv, 1917–1921

    Full text link
    The article was submitted on 19.07.2018.This article analyzes the memoir of a Russian-speaking Jewish lawyer, Aleksei Goldenveiser (1890–1979), as a source on the history of Kyiv during the revolutionary period (1917–1921). His work stands out among other reminiscences about the Revolution in Ukraine because of the author’s unprecedented attention to details of everyday life, along with his self-identification as simply an apolitical resident of Kyiv. Especially striking is the author’s satirical, even acerbic, tone in the description of all the political regimes that came to power in Kyiv during the Revolution: Ukrainian, White, and Bolshevik. This article proposes to conceptualize Goldenveizer’s position as metahistorical skepticism or as a strategy of conscious resistance to grand narratives, which is grounded in identification with the local and a focus on everydayness. It argues the Goldenveizer developed this narrative strategy following the failure, in the summer of 1917, of the political project of a civic, multinational, and urban identity. Although Goldenveizer served on the Executive Committee of United Civic Organizations in Kyiv and, briefly, on the Small Rada of the Ukrainian Central Rada, he felt like an outsider in politics of the day and described it as an astute bystander rather than participant. Because of this position, he was the first to note the reversal of imperial hierarchies and the creation of a new category: β€œnational minorities.” At the same time, Goldenveizer consistently attempted in his memoir to check his own political and cultural biases, as one can see in his ambiguous treatment of the Ukrainian language and the Ukrainian national movement.Π‘Ρ‚Π°Ρ‚ΡŒΡ посвящСна Π°Π½Π°Π»ΠΈΠ·Ρƒ воспоминаний русскоязычного СврСйского Π°Π΄Π²ΠΎΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π° АлСксСя Π“ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ΄Π΅Π½Π²Π΅ΠΉΠ·Π΅Ρ€Π° (1890–1979) ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ источника ΠΏΠΎ истории КиСва Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΎΠ΄Π° (1917–1921). Π•Π³ΠΎ Ρ‚Ρ€ΡƒΠ΄ выдСляСтся срСди Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈΡ… воспоминаний ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π½Π° Π£ΠΊΡ€Π°ΠΈΠ½Π΅ благодаря бСспрСцСдСнтному вниманию ΠΊ дСталям повсСднСвной ΠΆΠΈΠ·Π½ΠΈ, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ самоидСнтификации Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° просто ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π°ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ТитСля КиСва. БатиричСский, Π΄Π°ΠΆΠ΅ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Ρ‡Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ½ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° особСнно Π·Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅Π½ Π² описаниях всСх политичСских Ρ€Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΡ…ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΊ власти Π² КиСвС Π²ΠΎ врСмя Ρ€Π΅Π²ΠΎΠ»ΡŽΡ†ΠΈΠΈ: украинского, Π±Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π²ΠΈΡΡ‚ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ. Автор ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄Π»Π°Π³Π°Π΅Ρ‚ ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΡƒΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Ρ‚ΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΡŽ Π“ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ΄Π΅Π½Π²Π΅ΠΉΠ·Π΅Ρ€Π° ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ «мСтаисторичСский скСптицизм», ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΈΡŽ ΡΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ сопротивлСния большим Π½Π°Ρ€Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π°ΠΌ, которая базируСтся Π½Π° ΠΈΠ΄Π΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΈΡ„ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ с Π»ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΈ фокусС Π½Π° повсСднСвности. Показано, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ Π“ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ΄Π΅Π½Π²Π΅ΠΉΠ·Π΅Ρ€ Π²Ρ‹Ρ€Π°Π±ΠΎΡ‚Π°Π» эту Π½Π°Ρ€Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΡƒΡŽ ΡΡ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΈΡŽ послС пораТСния Π»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ 1917 Π³. политичСского ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° граТданской ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎΠ½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ городской идСнтичности. Π₯отя Π“ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ΄Π΅Π½Π²Π΅ΠΉΠ·Π΅Ρ€ Π±Ρ‹Π» Ρ‡Π»Π΅Π½ΠΎΠΌ Π˜ΡΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ‚Π° ΠžΠ±ΡŠΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ½Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… общСствСнных ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ КиСва, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ Малой Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρ‹ Украинской Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ€Π°Π΄Ρ‹, Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ чувствовал сСбя аутсайдСром ΠΈ описывал Π΅Π΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Π½Π°Π±Π»ΡŽΠ΄Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ посторонний, Π° Π½Π΅ участник. Благодаря Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΠΎΠ·ΠΈΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΎΠ½ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ» Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΡƒΡŽ пСрСстановку импСрских ΠΈΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ€Ρ…ΠΈΠΉ ΠΈ созданиС Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ ΠΊΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Π³ΠΎΡ€ΠΈΠΈ Β«Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡˆΠΈΠ½ΡΡ‚Π²Β». Π’ Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΆΠ΅ врСмя Π“ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ΄Π΅Π½Π²Π΅ΠΉΠ·Π΅Ρ€ постоянно старался Π½Π΅ Π΄ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡΡ‚ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±Ρ‹ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΊΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚ΡƒΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ политичСскиС прСдпочтСния сдСлали тСкст односторонним, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΎ ΠΊ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ΅ украинского языка ΠΈ украинского Π½Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ двиТСния

    Cell competition in intratumoral and tumor microenvironment interactions

    No full text
    Tumors are complex cellular and acellular environments within which cancer clones are under continuous selection pressures. Cancer cells are in a permanent mode of interaction and competition with each other as well as with the immediate microenvironment. In the course of these competitive interactions, cells share information regarding their general state of fitness, with less-fit cells being typically eliminated via apoptosis at the hands of those cells with greater cellular fitness. Competitive interactions involving exchange of cell fitness information have implications for tumor growth, metastasis, and therapy outcomes. Recent research has highlighted sophisticated pathways such as Flower, Hippo, Myc, and p53 signaling, which are employed by cancer cells and the surrounding microenvironment cells to achieve their evolutionary goals by means of cell competition mechanisms. In this review, we discuss these recent findings and explain their importance and role in evolution, growth, and treatment of cancer. We further consider potential physiological conditions, such as hypoxia and chemotherapy, that can function as selective pressures under which cell competition mechanisms may evolve differently or synergistically to confer oncogenic advantages to cancer

    Antigen presentation plays positive roles in the regenerative response to cardiac injury in zebrafish

    Get PDF
    In contrast to adult mammals, adult zebrafish can fully regenerate injured cardiac tissue, and this regeneration process requires an adequate and tightly controlled immune response. However, which components of the immune response are required during regeneration is unclear. Here, we report positive roles for the antigen presentation-adaptive immunity axis during zebrafish cardiac regeneration. We find that following the initial innate immune response, activated endocardial cells (EdCs), as well as immune cells, start expressing antigen presentation genes. We also observe that T helper cells, a.k.a. Cd4(+) T cells, lie in close physical proximity to these antigen-presenting EdCs. We targeted Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II antigen presentation by generating cd74a; cd74b mutants, which display a defective immune response. In these mutants, Cd4(+) T cells and activated EdCs fail to efficiently populate the injured tissue and EdC proliferation is significantly decreased. cd74a; cd74b mutants exhibit additional defects in cardiac regeneration including reduced cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Notably, Cd74 also becomes activated in neonatal mouse EdCs following cardiac injury. Altogether, these findings point to positive roles for antigen presentation during cardiac regeneration, potentially involving interactions between activated EdCs, classical antigen-presenting cells, and Cd4(+) T cells

    Pleiotropic effects of laminar flow and statins depend on the KrΓΌppel-like factor-induced lncRNA MANTIS

    No full text
    AIMS: To assess the functional relevance and therapeutic potential of the pro-angiogenic long non-coding RNA MANTIS in vascular disease development. METHODS AND RESULTS: RNA sequencing, CRISPR activation, overexpression, and RNAi demonstrated that MANTIS, especially its Alu-element, limits endothelial ICAM-1 expression in different types of endothelial cells. Loss of MANTIS increased endothelial monocyte adhesion in an ICAM-1-dependent manner. MANTIS reduced the binding of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodelling factor BRG1 at the ICAM-1 promoter. The expression of MANTIS was induced by laminar flow and HMG-CoA-reductase inhibitors (statins) through mechanisms involving epigenetic rearrangements and the transcription factors KLF2 and KLF4. Mutation of the KLF binding motifs in the MANTIS promoter blocked the flow-induced MANTIS expression. Importantly, the expression of MANTIS in human carotid artery endarterectomy material was lower compared with healthy vessels and this effect was prevented by statin therapy. Interestingly, the protective effects of statins were mediated in part through MANTIS, which was required to facilitate the atorvastatin-induced changes in endothelial gene expression. Moreover, the beneficial endothelial effects of statins in culture models (spheroid outgrowth, proliferation, telomerase activity, and vascular organ culture) were lost upon knockdown of MANTIS. CONCLUSION: MANTIS is tightly regulated by the transcription factors KLF2 and KLF4 and limits the ICAM-1 mediated monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and thus potentially atherosclerosis development in humans. The beneficial effects of statin treatment and laminar flow are dependent on MANTIS
    corecore