Which actigraphic variables optimally characterize the sleep-wake cycle of individuals with bipolar disorders? Significant outcomes

International audienceOBJECTIVE: To examine which combination of objectively measured actigraphy parameters best characterizes the sleep-wake cycle of euthymic individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) compared with healthy controls (HC).METHODS: Sixty-one BD cases and 61 matched HC undertook 21 consecutive days of actigraphy. Groups were compared using discriminant function analyses (DFA) that explored dimensions derived from mean values of sleep parameters (Model 1); variability of sleep parameters (2); daytime activity (3); and combined sleep and activity parameters (4). Exploratory within-group analyses examined characteristics associated with misclassification.RESULTS: After controlling for depressive symptoms, the combined model (4) correctly classified 75% cases, while the sleep models (1 and 2) correctly classified 87% controls. The area under the curve favored the combined model (0.86). Age was significantly associated with misclassification among HC, while a diagnosis of BD-II was associated with an increased risk of misclassifications of cases.CONCLUSION: Including sleep variability and activity parameters alongside measures of sleep quantity improves the characterization of cases of euthymic BD and helps distinguish them from HC. If replicated, the findings indicate that traditional approaches to actigraphy (examining mean values for the standard set of sleep parameters) may represent a suboptimal approach to understanding sleep-wake cycles in BD

Eveningness and poor sleep quality contribute to depressive residual symptoms and behavioral inhibition in patients with bipolar disorder

Eveningness and sleep disturbances are considered as markers of Bipolar Disorder (BD) and influence mood and emotional or behavioral states. This study investigates the associations between circadian markers and sleep quality on residual depressive symptoms and inhibition/activation dimensions during the euthymic phase. A sample of 89 euthymic adult individuals with BD was assessed for circadian preference and typology using the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM) and the Circadian Type Inventory (CTI) and for sleep quality using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Multidimensional Assessment of Thymic States (MAThyS) were used to measure residual depressive symptoms and the inhibition/activation dimensions. We examined any associations between these parameters using correlations and path analyses. We identified significant associations between eveningness and poorer sleep quality that correlated to higher depressive residual symptoms and a global inhibition. The use of path analyses led us to conclude that poor sleep quality mediated the relationship between eveningness and either residual mood symptoms or behavioral inhibition (motivation, sensory perception, interpersonal interaction, and cognition). These factors should be considered in the clinical evaluation of individuals with BD, with a specific attention during the euthymic phase, in order to achieve the best functional outcome possible

Five-year outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation using termination of atrial fibrillation as a procedural endpoint.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine 5-year efficacy of catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using AF termination as a procedural end point. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients (57±10 years) underwent persistent AF ablation using a stepwise ablation approach (pulmonary vein isolation, electrogram-guided, and linear ablation) with the desired procedural end point being AF termination. Repeat ablation was performed for recurrent AF or atrial tachycardia. AF was terminated by ablation in 120 patients (80%). Arrhythmia-free survival rates after a single procedure were 35.3%±3.9%, 28.0%±3.7%, and 16.8%±3.2% at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Arrhythmia-free survival rates after the last procedure (mean 2.1±1.0 procedures) were 89.7%±2.5%, 79.8%±3.4%, and 62.9%±4.5%, at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. During a median follow-up of 58 (interquartile range, 43-73) months after the last ablation procedure, 97 of 150 (64.7%) patients remained in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic drugs. Another 14 (9.3%) patients maintained sinus rhythm after reinitiation of antiarrhythmic drugs, and an additional 15 (10.0%) patients regressed to paroxysmal recurrences only. Failure to terminate AF during the index procedure (hazard ratio 3.831; 95% confidence interval, 2.070-7.143; P<0.001), left atrial diameter ≥50 mm (hazard ratio 2.083; 95% confidence interval, 1.078-4.016; P=0.03), continuous AF duration ≥18 months (hazard ratio 1.984; 95% confidence interval, 1.024-3.846; P<0.04), and structural heart disease (hazard ratio 1.874; 95% confidence interval, 1.037-3.388; P=0.04) predicted arrhythmia recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, an ablation strategy aiming at AF termination is associated with freedom from arrhythmia recurrence in the majority of patients over a 5-year follow-up period. Procedural AF nontermination and specific baseline factors predict long-term outcome after ablation