Detection of the high z GRB 080913 and its implications on progenitors and energy extraction mechanisms

Aims. We present multiwavelength observations of one of the most distant gamma-ray bursts detected so far, GRB 080913. Based on these observations, we consider whether it could be classified as a short-duration GRB and discuss the implications for the progenitor nature and energy extraction mechanisms. Methods. Multiwavelength X-ray, near IR and millimetre observations were made between 20.7 h and ~16.8 days after the event. Results. Whereas a very faint afterglow was seen at the 3.5m CAHA telescope in the nIR, the X-ray afterglow was clearly detected in both Swift and XMM-Newton observations. An upper limit is reported in the mm range. We have modeled the data assuming a collimated ≳ 3° blast wave with an energy injection at days carrying erg or approximately 12 times the initial energy of the blast wave. We find that GRB 080913 shares many of the gamma-ray diagnostics with the more recent burst GRB 090423 for being classified as short had they ocurred at low redshift. If the progenitor were a compact binary merger, it is likely composed by a NS and BH. The Blandford-Znajek (BZ) mechanism is the preferred one to extract energy from the central, maximally-rotating BH. Both the magnetic field close to the event horizon (B) and the BH mass () are restricted within a relatively narrow range, such that . Similar constraints on the central BH hold for collapsar-like progenitor systems if the BZ-mechanism works for the system at hand

Multi-wavelength afterglow observations of the high redshift GRB 050730

Context.GRB 050730 is a long duration high-redshift burst (z=3.967) that was discovered by Swift. The afterglow shows variability and was well monitored over a wide wavelength range. We present comprehensive temporal and spectral analysis of the afterglow of GRB 050730 including observations covering the wavelength range from the millimeter to X-rays. Aims.We use multi-wavelength afterglow data to understand the complex temporal and spectral decay properties of this high redshift burst. Methods.Five telescopes were used to study the decaying afterglow of GRB 050730 in the B, V, r', R, i', I, J and K photometric pass bands. A spectral energy distribution was constructed at 2.9 h post-burst in the B, V, R, I, J and K bands. X-ray data from the satellites Swift and XMM-Newton were used to study the afterglow evolution at higher energies. Results.The early afterglow shows variability at early times and the slope steepens at 0.1 days (8.6 ks) in the B, V, r', R, i', I, J and K passbands. The early afterglow light curve decayed with a powerlaw slope index $\alpha_1 = -0.60\pm0.07$ and subsequently steepened to $\alpha_2 = -1.71\pm0.06$ based on the R and I band data. A millimeter detection of the afterglow around 3 days after the burst shows an excess in comparison to theoretical predictions. The early X-ray light curve observed by Swift is complex and contains flares. At late times the X-ray light curve can be fit by a powerlaw decay with $\alpha_x = -2.5\pm0.15$ which is steeper than the optical light curve. A spectral energy distribution (SED) was constructed at ~2.9 h after the burst. An electron energy index, p, of ~2.3 was calculated using the SED and the photon index from the X-ray afterglow spectra and implies that the synchrotron cooling frequency $\nu_{\rm c}$ is above the X-ray band

The nature of the X-ray flash of August 24 2005 Photometric evidence for an on-axis z = 0.83 burst with continuous energy injection and an associated supernova?

Aims.Our aim is to investigate the nature of the X-Ray Flash (XRF) of August 24, 2005. Methods.We present comprehensive photometric R-band observations of the fading optical afterglow of XRF 050824, from 11 min to 104 days after the burst. In addition we present observations taken during the first day in the $\it BRIK$ bands and two epochs of spectroscopy. We also analyse available X-ray data. Results.The R-band lightcurve of the afterglow resembles the lightcurves of long duration Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs), i.e., a power-law, albeit with a rather shallow slope of $\alpha=0.6$ ( $F_{\nu} \propto t^{-\alpha}$). Our late R-band images reveal the host galaxy. The rest-frame B-band luminosity is ~0.5 L*. The star-formation rate as determined from the [O II] emission line is ~ $1.8~M_{\odot}$ yr-1. When accounting for the host contribution, the slope is $\alpha=0.65$ $\pm$ 0.01 and a break in the lightcurve is suggested. A potential lightcurve bump at 2 weeks can be interpreted as a supernova only if this is a supernova with a fast rise and a fast decay. However, the overall fit still shows excess scatter in the lightcurve in the form of wiggles and bumps. The flat lightcurves in the optical and X-rays could be explained by a continuous energy injection scenario, with an on-axis viewing angle and a wide jet opening angle ( \theta_j \ga {10}^\circ). If the energy injections are episodic this could potentially help explain the bumps and wiggles. Spectroscopy of the afterglow gives a redshift of z=0.828 $\pm$ 0.005 from both absorption and emission lines. The spectral energy distribution (SED) of the afterglow has a power-law ( $F_{\nu} \propto \nu ^{-\beta}$) shape with slope ${\beta}=0.56$ $\pm$ 0.04. This can be compared to the X-ray spectral index which is ${\beta_{\rm X}}=1.0$ $\pm$ 0.1. The curvature of the SED constrains the dust reddening towards the burst to $A_{\rm v}<0.5$ mag