Superactive mutants of thromboxane prostanoid receptor: Functional and computational analysis of an active form alternative to constitutively active mutants

In class A GPCRs the E/DRY motif is critical for receptor activation and function. According to experimental and computational data, R3.50 forms a double salt bridge with the adjacent E/D3.49 and E/D6.30 in helix 6, constraining the receptor in an inactive state. The disruption of this network of interactions facilitates conformational transitions that generate a signal or constitutive activity. Here we demonstrate that non-conservative substitution of either E129(3.49) or E240(6.30) of thromboxane prostanoid receptor (TP) resulted in mutants characterized by agonist-induced more efficient signaling properties, regardless of the G protein coupling. Results of computational modeling suggested a more effective interaction between G q and the agonist-bound forms of the TP mutants, compared to the wild type. Yet, none of the mutants examined revealed any increase in basal activity, precluding their classification as constitutively active mutants. Here, we propose that these alternative active conformations might be identified as superactive mutants or SAM. \ua9 2010 Springer Basel AG

Superactive mutants of thromboxane prostanoid receptor: functional and computational analysis of an active form alternative to constitutively active mutants

In class A GPCRs the E/DRY motif is critical for receptor activation and function. According to experimental and computational data, R3.50 forms a double salt bridge with the adjacent E/D3.49 and E/D6.30 in helix 6, constraining the receptor in an inactive state. The disruption of this network of interactions facilitates conformational transitions that generate a signal or constitutive activity. Here we demonstrate that non-conservative substitution of either E129((3.49)) or E240((6.30)) of thromboxane prostanoid receptor (TP) resulted in mutants characterized by agonist-induced more efficient signaling properties, regardless of the G protein coupling. Results of computational modeling suggested a more effective interaction between G(q) and the agonist-bound forms of the TP mutants, compared to the wild type. Yet, none of the mutants examined revealed any increase in basal activity, precluding their classification as constitutively active mutants. Here, we propose that these alternative active conformations might be identified as superactive mutants or SAM

RUES2 hESCs exhibit MGE-biased neuronal differentiation and muHTT-dependent defective specification hinting at SP1

RUES2 cell lines represent the first collection of isogenic human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) carrying different pathological CAG lengths in the HTT gene. However, their neuronal differentiation potential has yet to be thoroughly evaluated. Here, we report that RUES2 during ventral telencephalic differentiation is biased towards medial ganglionic eminence (MGE). We also show that HD-RUES2 cells exhibit an altered MGE transcriptional signature in addition to recapitulating known HD phenotypes, with reduced expression of the neurodevelopmental regulators NEUROD1 and BDNF and increased cleavage of synaptically enriched N-cadherin. Finally, we identified the transcription factor SP1 as a common potential detrimental co-partner of muHTT by de novo motif discovery analysis on the LGE, MGE, and cortical genes differentially expressed in HD human pluripotent stem cells in our and additional datasets. Taken together, these observations suggest a broad deleterious effect of muHTT in the early phases of neuronal development that may unfold through its altered interaction with SP1