International Consensus Statement on Rhinology and Allergy: Rhinosinusitis

Background: The 5 years since the publication of the first International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis (ICAR‐RS) has witnessed foundational progress in our understanding and treatment of rhinologic disease. These advances are reflected within the more than 40 new topics covered within the ICAR‐RS‐2021 as well as updates to the original 140 topics. This executive summary consolidates the evidence‐based findings of the document. Methods: ICAR‐RS presents over 180 topics in the forms of evidence‐based reviews with recommendations (EBRRs), evidence‐based reviews, and literature reviews. The highest grade structured recommendations of the EBRR sections are summarized in this executive summary. Results: ICAR‐RS‐2021 covers 22 topics regarding the medical management of RS, which are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Additionally, 4 topics regarding the surgical management of RS are grade A/B and are presented in the executive summary. Finally, a comprehensive evidence‐based management algorithm is provided. Conclusion: This ICAR‐RS‐2021 executive summary provides a compilation of the evidence‐based recommendations for medical and surgical treatment of the most common forms of RS

Projected cutting guides using an augmented reality system to improve surgical margins in maxillectomies: A preclinical study

Background: Positive margins have been reported up to 80% in advanced maxillary cancers. Intraoperative navigation (IN) aims to improve margins, but provides a two-dimensional view of a registered instrument without anticipating any cutting directions, and the information is displayed in monitors outside surgical field. Augmented Reality (AR) can delineate margins while addressing the gaze-toggling drawback of IN. In a preclinical setting, we implemented preoperative-planned osteotomies needed for maxillectomies and projected this information on the surgical field using AR. We aimed to improve negative margin rates while retaining the benefits of AR. Methods: Five maxillary tumor models were built. Five fellowship-trained surgeons completed virtual unguided and AR-guided maxillectomies. Comparisons in terms of intratumoral cuts, close, adequate, and excessive distances from the tumor were performed. Differences between “ideal” cutting-plan and the AR-guided virtual osteotomies was obtained. Workload questionnaires to evaluate the technology were completed. Results: 115 virtual osteotomies were analyzed. Intra-tumoral and “close” margins were lower for the AR-assisted osteotomies (0.0% vs 1.9% p < 0.0001 and 0.8% vs 7.9% p < 0.0001). Proportion of “adequate” margins were higher in the AR simulations (25.3% vs 18.6%, p = 0.018). The AR osteotomies had high similarity with the pre-planned with interclass correlation index close to 1 in “adequate” margins 0.893 (95% CI: 0.804–0.949). Workload scores were better for AR-guided simulations for the domains of mental demand, performance, effort and frustration. Conclusion: The projector-based AR method improved margin delineation, and preoperative planning was accurately translated to the simulations. Clinical translation will aim to consolidate our preclinical findings to improve outcomes