Intra-articular administrations of Jonexa® in patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip. Data from a monocentric cohort study

n/

Hip viscosupplementation under ultra-sound guidance riduces NSAID consumption in symptomatic hip osteoarthritis patients in a long follow-up. Data from Italian registry.

Introduction: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) consumption is strictly related to a high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate. Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommendations in patients with symptomatic hip or knee OA stated that NSAIDs should be used at the lowest effective dose but their long-term use should be avoided if possible. OARSI guidelines for the treatment of the hip OA include the use of viscosupplementation, which aims to restore physiological and Theological features of the synovial fluid. Objective: Aim of this multicentric, open and retrospective study is to investigate if NSAID consumption may be reduced by the use of ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of several hyaluronic acid (HA) products in hip joint administered in patients affected by symptomatic hip OA. Materials and Methods: Patients affected by mono or bilateral symptomatic hip OA according to American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, radiological OA graded II-IV (Kellgren and Lawrence) entered the study and were administered with ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid products. As a primary endpoint, consumption of NSAIDs was evaluated by recording the number of days a month (range 0-30) the patient had used NSAID during the previous month, reported at each visit during the 24 months follow-up period. Secondary endpoints included further analysis for subgroups of patients categorized for Lequesne index score, Kellgren-Lawrence score, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, ultrasound pattern, age, hyaluronic acid used. Results: 2343 patients entered the study. Regarding primary endpoint, the consumption of NSAIDs was reduced of 48.2% at the third month when compared with baseline values. This sparing effect increased at 12th and 24th month with a reduction respectively of 50% and 61% in comparison to baseline values. These differences were statistically significant. Conclusions: These data point out that intraarticular hyaluronan preparations provide OA pain relief and reduce NSAIDs consumption in a large cohort of patients for a long period of follow-up. Multiple courses of viscosupplementation (vs) are required to maintain low dose of NSAID consumption over time. NSAIDs consumption is strictly related to an high gastrointestinal and cardiovascular mortality and morbidity rate, instead HA intra-articular treatment is well tolerated and is associated with a low incidence of adverse effects. For these reasons further studies evaluating cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of VS in the management of hip OA are required

Intra-Articular Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% in Patients Affected by Symptomatic Hip Osteoarthritis: Effectiveness and Safety in a Large Cohort of Patients

The aim of this prospective observational study is to assess the efficacy and safety profile of intraarticular Sinovial® Forte 1.6% administered under ultrasound-guidance in a large cohort of patients affected by symptomatic hip osteoarthritis (OA). Patients with symptomatic hip OA referred to our clinic in 2008–2010 received one 4 ml (2 vials) intra-articular injection of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% under ultrasound guidance. Patients were followed-up every 3 months for a total of 6 months and were offered an optional, additional injection at the 3-month follow-up visit if clinically justified. At each visit, pain scores [0–10 Visual Analogue Scale (pain VAS)], Lequesne index scores and NSAID intake were recorded. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded throughout the study. An effect size of 30% and 50% reduction in Lequesne index and Pain VAS scores was evaluated for each patient to ascertain the number of patients achieving partial remission of symptoms and functional impairment by the use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in hip osteoarthritis. One hundred and fourteen patients completed the 6-month follow-up and received a total of 142 injections. A statistically significant reduction in Lequesne index scores, VAS pain scores and NSAID consumption was observed at all time-points ( p < 0.05). No systemic, severe or even moderate side effects were observed. Only 7 patients reported mild local reaction at the injection site, consisting of mild pain and localized warmth, which resolved spontaneously without any additional medication. This study provides evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of Sinovial® Forte 1.6% in the treatment of patients affected by symptomatic hip OA. Sinovial® Forte may also offer economical benefits, owing to the reduction in NSAID consumption associated with this treatment. The percentage of patients achieving the effect size of 30% and 50% reduction in Lequesne index and pain VAS scores encourages the use of intra-articular hyaluronic acid in patients with hip osteoarthritis

Can we also treat hip osteoarthritis with intra-articular injections of hialuronic acid? Clinical results of 2 year experience using ultrasound guided intra-articular injections

Aim. Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is the most frequent joint involved after the knee. Its treatment is based on muscular rehabilitation, weight loss and NSAID. NSAID therapy may cause many side effects. The intra-articular injection of hialuronic products hialuronic acid (HA), called viscosupplementation, has broadly been used in knee osteoarthritis. The aim of our study is to evaluate effectiveness and safety of ultrasound guided viscosupplementation in hip osteoarthritis. Methods. Pilot study 1: 19 patients have been treated with HA molecular weight of 500-730 kDa. Effectiveness has been valued through a questionnaire to appraise the mobility and VAS pain. Pilot study 2: 8 patients have been treated with HA molecular weight of 1.000 kDA. Pilot study 3: 12 patients patients have been treated with HA molecular weight up to 7.000 kDa. In the last 2 studies, Lequesne index, VAS pain and NSAID consumption have been evaluated. Results. In pilot study 1 there was a statistical significant reduction in VAS pain and patients judged their motility as improved (42,1%) or much improved (57,8%). In pilot studies 2 and 3 there was a statistical significant reduction in Lequesne index, VAS pain and NSAID consumption. Conclusion. Our data suggest that ultrasound guided administration of hialuronic products is a safe and effective treatment for hip osteoarthritis. Further studies are necessary to determine the benefit duration and the optimal number of intra-articular injections

The technique of intradiscal injection: A narrative review

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common spine diseases and represents the most frequent cause of absence from work in developed countries. Approximately 40% of chronic LBP is related to discogenic origin. The goal of the study is producing a review of literature to describe analytically the techniques of intradiscal injections. Methods: PubMed database was searched for clinical studies with the different key terms: “intradiscal”, “injection”, “steroid” “procedures”, “techniques”, “CT”, “MRI”, “fluoro-scopy”, “fluoroscopic”, “guidance”, “ozone”, “ultrasound”, “images”. Only studies written in English, French, or Italian in which the intradiscal injection represents the main procedure for the low back discopathy treatment on humans were considered. We excluded the articles that do not mention this procedure; those which indicated that the intradiscal injection had happened accidentally during other treatments; those reporting the patient’s pain was deter-mined by other causes than the discopathy (facet joint syndrome, tumor, spondylodiscitis). Results: Thirty-one articles dated from 1969 to 2018 met the criteria. The examined population was 6843 subjects, 52.3% male and 47.7% female, with a mean age of 45.9 ±10.1 years. The techniques are highly variable in terms of procedure: different operators, needle guidance, injection sites, drugs, tilt angle of the needle). Conclusion: The efficacy and the safety of the intradiscal procedures are not easily comparable due to different types of studies and their limited number. Further studies are needed to standardize the intradiscal injection technique/procedure to improve safety, repeat-ability and effectiveness, and last but not least to reduce peri-and postoperative care and health-care costs