19 research outputs found

    No-reference image and video quality assessment: a classification and review of recent approaches

    Get PDF

    Optimization of Single Voxel MR Spectroscopy Sequence Parameters and Data Analysis Methods for Thermometry in Deep Hyperthermia Treatments

    No full text
    Objective: The difference in the resonance frequency of water and methylene moieties of lipids quantifies in magnetic resonance spectroscopy the absolute temperature using a predefined calibration curve. The purpose of this study was the investigation of peak evaluation methods and the magnetic resonance spectroscopy sequence (point-resolved spectroscopy) parameter optimization that enables thermometry during deep hyperthermia treatments. Materials and Methods: Different Lorentz peak-fitting methods and a peak finding method using singular value decomposition of a Hankel matrix were compared. Phantom measurements on organic substances (mayonnaise and pork) were performed inside the hyperthermia 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system for the parameter optimization study. Parameter settings such as voxel size, echo time, and flip angle were varied and investigated. Results: Usually all peak analyzing methods were applicable. Lorentz peak-fitting method in MATLAB proved to be the most stable regardless of the number of fitted peaks, yet the slowest method. The examinations yielded an optimal parameter combination of 8 cm3 voxel volume, 55 millisecond echo time, and a 90° excitation pulse flip angle. Conclusion: The Lorentz peak-fitting method in MATLAB was the most reliable peak analyzing method. Measurements in homogeneous and heterogeneous phantoms resulted in optimized parameters for the magnetic resonance spectroscopy sequence for thermometry

    Modeling and estimation of signal-dependent and correlated noise

    Get PDF
    The additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) model is ubiquitous in signal processing. This model is often justified by central-limit theorem (CLT) arguments. However, whereas the CLT may support a Gaussian distribution for the random errors, it does not provide any justification for the assumed additivity and whiteness. As a matter of fact, data acquired in real applications can seldom be described with good approximation by the AWGN model, especially because errors are typically correlated and not additive. Failure to model accurately the noise leads to inaccurate analysis, ineffective filtering, and distortion or even failure in the estimation. This chapter provides an introduction to both signal-dependent and correlated noise and to the relevant models and basic methods for the analysis and estimation of these types of noise. Generic one-parameter families of distributions are used as the essential mathematical setting for the observed signals. The distribution families covered as leading examples include Poisson, mixed Poisson–Gaussian, various forms of signal-dependent Gaussian noise (including multiplicative families and approximations of the Poisson family), as well as doubly censored heteroskedastic Gaussian distributions. We also consider various forms of noise correlation, encompassing pixel and readout cross-talk, fixed-pattern noise, column/row noise, etc., as well as related issues like photo-response and gain nonuniformity. The introduced models and methods are applicable to several important imaging scenarios and technologies, such as raw data from digital camera sensors, various types of radiation imaging relevant to security and to biomedical imaging.acceptedVersionPeer reviewe
    corecore