5 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Initiator Control of Conjugated Polymer Topology in Ring-Opening Alkyne Metathesis Polymerization
Molybdenum
carbyne complexes [RCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] featuring a mesityl (R
= Mes) or an ethyl (R = Et) substituent initiate the living ring-opening
alkyne metathesis polymerization of the strained cyclic alkyne, 5,6,11,12-tetradehydrobenzo[<i>a</i>,<i>e</i>][8]annulene, to yield fully conjugated
poly(<i>o</i>-phenylene ethynylene). The difference in the
steric demand of the polymer end-group (Mes vs Et) transferred during
the initiation step determines the topology of the resulting polymer
chain. While [MesCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] exclusively yields linear poly(<i>o</i>-phenylene ethynylene), polymerization initiated by [EtCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] results in cyclic
polymers ranging in size from <i>n</i> = 5 to 20 monomer
units. Kinetic studies reveal that the propagating species emerging
from [EtCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] undergoes a highly selective intramolecular backbiting
into the butynyl end-group
Initiator Control of Conjugated Polymer Topology in Ring-Opening Alkyne Metathesis Polymerization
Molybdenum
carbyne complexes [RCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] featuring a mesityl (R
= Mes) or an ethyl (R = Et) substituent initiate the living ring-opening
alkyne metathesis polymerization of the strained cyclic alkyne, 5,6,11,12-tetradehydrobenzo[<i>a</i>,<i>e</i>][8]annulene, to yield fully conjugated
poly(<i>o</i>-phenylene ethynylene). The difference in the
steric demand of the polymer end-group (Mes vs Et) transferred during
the initiation step determines the topology of the resulting polymer
chain. While [MesCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] exclusively yields linear poly(<i>o</i>-phenylene ethynylene), polymerization initiated by [EtCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] results in cyclic
polymers ranging in size from <i>n</i> = 5 to 20 monomer
units. Kinetic studies reveal that the propagating species emerging
from [EtCMo(OC(CH<sub>3</sub>)(CF<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>] undergoes a highly selective intramolecular backbiting
into the butynyl end-group
Synergistic Enhancement of Electrocatalytic CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction with Gold Nanoparticles Embedded in Functional Graphene Nanoribbon Composite Electrodes
Regulating the complex environment
accounting for the stability,
selectivity, and activity of catalytic metal nanoparticle interfaces
represents a challenge to heterogeneous catalyst design. Here we demonstrate
the intrinsic performance enhancement of a composite material composed
of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) embedded in a bottom-up synthesized
graphene nanoribbon (GNR) matrix for the electrocatalytic reduction
of CO<sub>2</sub>. Electrochemical studies reveal that the structural
and electronic properties of the GNR composite matrix increase the
AuNP electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), lower the requisite
CO<sub>2</sub> reduction overpotential by hundreds of millivolts (catalytic
onset > −0.2 V versus reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)),
increase the Faraday efficiency (>90%), markedly improve stability
(catalytic performance sustained over >24 h), and increase the
total
catalytic output (>100-fold improvement over traditional amorphous
carbon AuNP supports). The inherent structural and electronic tunability
of bottom-up synthesized GNR-AuNP composites affords an unrivaled
degree of control over the catalytic environment, providing a means
for such profound effects as shifting the rate-determining step in
the electrocatalytic reduction of CO<sub>2</sub> to CO, and thereby
altering the electrocatalytic mechanism at the nanoparticle surface
Site-Specific Substitutional Boron Doping of Semiconducting Armchair Graphene Nanoribbons
A fundamental
requirement for the development of advanced electronic
device architectures based on graphene nanoribbon (GNR) technology
is the ability to modulate the band structure and charge carrier concentration
by substituting specific carbon atoms in the hexagonal graphene lattice
with p- or n-type dopant heteroatoms. Here we report the atomically
precise introduction of group III dopant atoms into bottom-up fabricated
semiconducting armchair GNRs (AGNRs). Trigonal-planar B atoms along
the backbone of the GNR share an empty p-orbital with the extended
π-band for dopant functionality. Scanning tunneling microscopy
(STM) topography reveals a characteristic modulation of the local
density of states along the backbone of the GNR that is superimposable
with the expected position and concentration of dopant B atoms. First-principles
calculations support the experimental findings and provide additional
insight into the band structure of B-doped 7-AGNRs
Concentration Dependence of Dopant Electronic Structure in Bottom-up Graphene Nanoribbons
Bottom-up
fabrication techniques enable atomically precise integration
of dopant atoms into the structure of graphene nanoribbons (GNRs).
Such dopants exhibit perfect alignment within GNRs and behave differently
from bulk semiconductor dopants. The effect of dopant concentration
on the electronic structure of GNRs, however, remains unclear despite
its importance in future electronics applications. Here we use scanning
tunneling microscopy and first-principles calculations to investigate
the electronic structure of bottom-up synthesized <i>N</i> = 7 armchair GNRs featuring varying concentrations of boron dopants.
First-principles calculations of freestanding GNRs predict that the
inclusion of boron atoms into a GNR backbone should induce two sharp
dopant states whose energy splitting varies with dopant concentration.
Scanning tunneling spectroscopy experiments, however, reveal two broad
dopant states with an energy splitting greater than expected. This
anomalous behavior results from an unusual hybridization between the
dopant states and the Au(111) surface, with the dopant–surface
interaction strength dictated by the dopant orbital symmetry