PDS Collaboration in the Design and Delivery of a Reading and Language Arts Methods Course

This paper describes the study of a site-based, six-credit hour, integrated course in reading and language arts methods designed to tie theory and practice for university students in a Professional Development School. A multidimensional approach to data collection and analysis used both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Findings demonstrate that the collaboratively taught course had a positive impact upon involved teachers, university students, children in the school, and members of the team who developed the course

Molecular profiling of multiplexed gene markers to assess viability of ex vivo human colon explant cultures

© Janice E. Drew et al. 2015; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the patients who kindly donated tissue samples, Sally Chalmers of the Tayside Tissue Bank for her help with collecting of the tissue donor samples, Emma Moss for advice on human colon dissection and explant culture, and Claus Dieter Mayer, Biomathematics and Statistics Scotland, for advice on statistical analysis. This work was supported by the Scottish Government (GT403), Scottish Universities Life Science Alliance, and TENOVUS Scotland.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

The Iowa Homemaker vol.32, no.8

Our Political Door Ajar, Dorothy Will, page 7 Parisian Views, Jane Steele, page 8 Warning! To a GI Wife Abroad, Roger Blobaum, page 9 Interviews – Give and Take, Nancy Butler, page 10 Veishea Highlight – Home Economics, Jane Brintlinger, page 11 Knowledge with Fun, Mary Camille Grout, page 14 New Collegiate You, Carol Dee Legg, page 15 What’s New, Evelyn Toulouse and Dorothy Will, page 16 Trends, Ruth Anderson, page 2

The Iowa Homemaker vol.32, no.7

Meet Miss Engineer, Beverly Gould, page 7 Home Economics Editor, Dorothy Will, page 8 Collegiate Toyland, Jane Steele, page 9 Your Valentine Mail Box, Salli Hearst and Mary Jean Stoddard, page 10 Farm Electricity Use, Mary Odegard, page 12 College Ties Continue, Eleanore Chase, page 13 Vitamin 607, Virginia Wilcox, page 14 Head First, Jean Goul, page 16 Trends, Ruth Anderson, page 1

The Iowa Homemaker vol.32, no.4

We Go Pogo, Too, Beverly Gould, page 7 Their Health in Her Hands, Marjorie Miller, page 8 Behind “The Magic Window”, Alane Baird, page 9 Date Doings in Ames, Ruth Anderson, page 10 Where and When, page 11 Before You Snap It, Jean Goul, page 12 She Cooks Before the Camera, Jane Steele, page 13 What’s New, Evelynn Toulouse and Dorothy Will, page 14 Football’s Inside Info, Colene Ruch, page 16 Time-Saver Plus!, Patricia Stiff, page 17 Trends, Joanne Ryals, page 1

The Iowa Homemaker vol.31, no.5

It’s Christmas, Nancy Voss, page 5 Christmas Presents for Iowa State, Mary Kay Pitzer and Jane Ann Steele, page 6 Holiday Homework, Jean McGhie, page 8 Avoid Job Rush, Alane Baird, page 9 The Story of the Ghent Altarpiece, Barbara Short, page 10 Toe Stuffers for Mom’s Stocking, Barbara Beck, page 12 What’s New, Constance Cornwell and Harriet LaRue, page 13 Christmas Coconut Snowballs, page 15 She Cooks in a Big Way, Ruth Anderson, page 16 Christmas Dessert, page 19 Trends, Anne Dallager, page 2

Reflective function as a mediator between childhood adversity, personality disorder and symptom distress

A growing body of literature has indicated the central role of childhood adversity for the development in later life of personality disorder (PD) and psychiatric distress. In this investigation, we examine the role of reflective function (RF) as a mediator between childhood adversity, subsequent development of PD and psychiatric morbidity. We tested the hypothesis that adversity leads to decreased RF, which in turn is associated with PD, and both increase the likelihood of psychiatric distress. The study sample consisted of 234 individuals, drawn from a clinical PD group (n = 112) and one demographically matched non-psychiatric group (n = 122) using a shared battery of measures, which included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Symptom Checklist-90-R and the Adult Attachment Interview, which was used to assess RF levels. The results indicated that childhood adversity predicted low level of RF, which in turn was associated with PD onset later in life. A combination of different early adverse experiences had a significantly greater impact on lowering RF scores than experiencing either neglect or abuse alone. Mediation analyses confirmed that RF was a significant mediator between adversity and PD diagnoses and between adversity and psychiatric distress. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Disorganized Attachment in Infancy: A Review of the Phenomenon and Its Implications for Clinicians and Policy-Makers

Disorganized/Disoriented (D) attachment has seen widespread interest from policy makers, practitioners, and clinicians in recent years. However, some of this interest seems to have been based on some false assumptions that (1) attachment measures can be used as definitive assessments of the individual in forensic/child protection settings and that disorganized attachment (2) reliably indicates child maltreatment, (3) is a strong predictor of pathology, and (4) represents a fixed or static trait of the child, impervious to development or help. This paper summarizes the evidence showing that these four assumptions are false and misleading. The paper reviews what is known about disorganized infant attachment and clarifies the implications of the classification for clinical and welfare practice with children. In particular, the difference between disorganized attachment and attachment disorder is examined, and a strong case is made for the value of attachment theory for supportive work with families and for the development and evaluation of evidence-based caregiving interventions

Time courses of improvement and symptom remission in children treated with atomoxetine for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: analysis of Canadian open-label studies

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The relatively short durations of the initial pivotal randomized placebo-controlled trials involving atomoxetine HCl for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) provided limited insight into the time courses of ADHD core symptom responses to this nonstimulant, selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate time courses of treatment responses or remission, as assessed by attainment of prespecified scores on the ADHD Rating Scale-IV-Parent Version: Investigator Administered and Scored (ADHDRS-IV-PI) and the Clinical Global Impressions-ADHD-Severity (CGI-ADHD-S) scales, during up to 1 year of atomoxetine treatment in children with ADHD.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Using pooled data from three Canadian open-label studies involving 338 children ages 6-11 years with ADHD who were treated with atomoxetine for 3, 6 and 12 months, and survival analysis methods for interval-censored data, we estimated the time to: 1) improvement and robust improvement defined by ≥25% and ≥40% reductions from baseline ADHDRS-IV-PI total scores, respectively; and 2) remission using two definitions: a final score of ADHDRS-IV-PI ≤18 or a final score of CGI-ADHD-S ≤2.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The median time to improvement was 3.7 weeks (~1 month), but remission of symptoms did not occur until a median of 14.3 weeks (~3.5 months) using the most stringent CGI-ADHD-S threshold. Probabilities of robust improvement were 47% at or before 4 weeks of treatment; 76% at 12 weeks; 85% at 26 weeks; and 96% at 52 weeks. Probabilities of remission at these corresponding time points were 30%, 59%, 77%, and 85% (using the ADHDRS-IV scale) and 8%, 47%, 67%, and 75% (using the CGI-ADHD-S scale). The change from atomoxetine treatment month 5 to month 12 of -1.01 (1.03) was not statistically significant (<it>p </it>= .33).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Reductions in core ADHD symptoms during atomoxetine treatment are gradual. Although approximately one-half of study participants showed improvement at 1 month of atomoxetine treatment, remission criteria were not met until about 3 months. Understanding the time course of children's responses to atomoxetine treatment may inform clinical decision making and also influence the durations of trials comparing the effects of this medication with other ADHD treatments.</p> <p>Trial Registrations</p> <p>clinicaltrials.gov: <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00191633">NCT00191633</a>, <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00216918">NCT00216918</a>, <a href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00191880">NCT00191880</a>.</p