21 research outputs found

    On the generation/decay of the storm‐enhanced density plumes: Role of the convection flow and field‐aligned ion flow

    Full text link
    Storm‐enhanced density (SED) plumes are prominent ionospheric electron density increases at the dayside middle and high latitudes. The generation and decay mechanisms of the plumes are still not clear. We present observations of SED plumes during six storms between 2010 and 2013 and comprehensively analyze the associated ionospheric parameters within the plumes, including vertical ion flow, field‐aligned ion flow and flux, plasma temperature, and field‐aligned currents, obtained from multiple instruments, including GPS total electron content (TEC), Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR), Super Dual Auroral Radar Network, and Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment. The TEC increase within the SED plumes at the PFISR site can be 1.4–5.5 times their quiet time value. The plumes are usually associated with northwestward E  ×  B flows ranging from a couple of hundred m s −1 to > 1 km s −1 . Upward vertical flows due to the projection of these E  ×  B drifts are mainly responsible for lifting the plasma in sunlit regions to higher altitude and thus leading to plume density enhancement. The upward vertical flows near the poleward part of the plumes are more persistent, while those near the equatorward part are more patchy. In addition, the plumes can be collocated with either upward or downward field‐aligned currents (FACs) but are usually observed equatorward of the peak of the Region 1 upward FAC, suggesting that the northwestward flows collocated with plumes can be either subauroral or auroral flows. Furthermore, during the decay phase of the plume, large downward ion flows, as large as ~200 m s −1 , and downward fluxes, as large as 10 14  m −2  s −1 , are often observed within the plumes. In our study of six storms, enhanced ambipolar diffusion due to an elevated pressure gradient is able to explain two of the four large downward flow/flux cases, but this mechanism is not sufficient for the other two cases where the flows are of larger magnitude. For the latter two cases, enhanced poleward thermospheric wind is suggested to be another mechanism for pushing the plasma downward along the field line. These downward flows should be an important mechanism for the decay of the SED plumes. Key Points Vertical plasma lifting leads to density increase during plume generation phase Large downward field‐aligned ion flow/flux seen during plume decay phase Complex‐induced plasma drifts seen indicating plumes' highly dynamic naturePeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/1/StormB_tec_20121113.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/2/QuietTimeF_tec_20100821.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/3/StormD_tec_20120423.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/4/QuietTimeC_tec_20120928.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/5/SupplementaryMaterial_Figure3_quiet.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/6/QuietTimeE_tec_20110203.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/7/StormC_tec_20120930.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/8/StormA_tec_20130423.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/9/StormF_tec_20100803.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/10/jgra51348.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/11/SupplementaryMaterial_Figure4_quiet.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/12/QuietTimeA_tec_20130421.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/13/QuietTimeD_tec_20120429.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/14/QuietTimeB_tec_20121109.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/109661/15/StormE_tec_20110204.pd

    Multi‐instrument observations of SED during 24–25 October 2011 storm: Implications for SED formation processes

    Full text link
    We present multiple instrument observations of a storm‐enhanced density (SED) during the 24–25 October 2011 intense geomagnetic storm. Formation and the subsequent evolution of the SED and the midlatitude trough are revealed by global GPS vertical total electron content maps. In addition, we present high time resolution Poker Flat Incoherent Scatter Radar (PFISR) observations of ionospheric profiles within the SED. We divided the SED observed by PFISR into two parts. Both parts are characterized by elevated ionospheric peak height ( h m F 2 ) and total electron content, compared to quiet time values. However, the two parts of the SED have different characteristics in the electron temperature ( T e ), the F region peak density ( N m F 2 ), and convection flows. The first part of the SED is associated with enhanced T e in the lower F region and reduced T e in the upper F region and is collocated with northward convection flows. The N m F 2 was lower than quiet time values. The second part of the SED is associated with significantly increased N m F 2 , elevated T e at all altitudes and is located near the equatorward boundary of large northwestward flows. Based on these observations, we suggest that the mechanisms responsible for the formation of the two parts of the SED may be different. The first part is due to equatorward expansion of the convection pattern and the projection of northward convection flows in the vertical direction, which lifts the ionospheric plasma to higher altitudes and thus reduces the loss rate of plasma recombination. The second part is more complicated. Besides equatorward expansion of the convection pattern and large upward flows, evidences of other mechanisms, including horizontal advection due to fast flows, energetic particle precipitation, and enhanced thermospheric wind in the topside ionosphere, are also present. Estimates show that contribution from precipitating energetic protons is at most ~10% of the total F region density. The thermospheric wind also plays a minor role in this case. Key Points SED formation during 24–25 October 2011 geomagnetic storm studied PFISR observations within the SED shown Electric field plays a major role in the formation of SED in this stormPeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/102626/1/jgra50711.pd

    On the Use of SuperDARN Ground Backscatter Measurements for Ionospheric Propagation Model Validation

    Get PDF
    Prior to use in operational systems, it is essential to validate ionospheric models in a manner relevant to their intended application to ensure satisfactory performance. For Over‐the‐Horizon radars (OTHR) operating in the high‐frequency (HF) band (3–30 MHz), the problem of model validation is severe when used in Coordinate Registration (CR) and Frequency Management Systems (FMS). It is imperative that the full error characteristics of models is well understood in these applications due to the critical relationship they impose on system performance. To better understand model performance in the context of OTHR, we introduce an ionospheric model validation technique using the oblique ground backscatter measurements in soundings from the Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN). Analysis is performed in terms of the F‐region leading edge (LE) errors and assessment of range‐elevation distributions using calibrated interferometer data. This technique is demonstrated by validating the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) 2016 for January and June in both 2014 and 2018. LE RMS errors of 100–400 km and 400–800 km are observed for winter and summer months, respectively. Evening errors regularly exceeding 1,000 km across all months are identified. Ionosonde driven corrections to the IRI‐2016 peak parameters provide improvements of 200–800 km to the LE, with the greatest improvements observed during the nighttime. Diagnostics of echo distributions indicate consistent underestimates in model NmF2 during the daytime hours of June 2014 due to offsets of −8° being observed in modeled elevation angles at 18:00 and 21:00 UT

    PFISR observation of intense ion upflow fluxes associated with an SED during the 1 June 2013 geomagnetic storm

    Full text link
    The Earth’s ionosphere plays an important role in supplying plasma into the magnetosphere through ion upflow/outflow, particularly during periods of strong solar wind driving. An intense ion upflow flux event during the 1 June 2013 storm has been studied using observations from multiple instruments. When the open‐closed field line boundary (OCB) moved into the Poker Flat incoherent scatter radar (PFISR) field of view, divergent ion fluxes were observed by PFISR with intense upflow fluxes reaching ~1.9 × 1014 m−2 s−1 at ~600 km altitude. Both ion and electron temperatures increased significantly within the ion upflow, and thus, this event has been classified as a type 2 upflow. We discuss factors contributing to the high electron density and intense ion upflow fluxes, including plasma temperature effect and preconditioning by storm‐enhanced density (SED). Our analysis shows that the significantly enhanced electron temperature due to soft electron precipitation in the cusp can reduce the dissociative recombination rate of molecular ions above ~400 km and contributed to the density increase. In addition, this intense ion upflow flux event is preconditioned by the lifted F region ionosphere due to northwestward convection flows in the SED plume. During this event, the OCB and cusp were detected by DMSP between 15 and 16 magnetic local times, unusually duskward. Results from a global magnetohydrodynamics simulation using the Space Weather Modeling Framework have been used to provide a global context for this event. This case study provides a more comprehensive mechanism for the generation of intense ion upflow fluxes observed in association with SEDs.Key PointsA more comprehensive mechanism for the generation of intense ion upflow fluxes observed in association with SEDs has been providedNorthwestward convection flows lift the F region ionosphere within SED and provide seed population for intense ion upflow fluxesSignificantly elevated electron temperature reduces recombination rate contributing to density increasePeer Reviewedhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136519/1/jgra53328.pdfhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136519/2/jgra53328_am.pd

    Multiresolution Modeling of High-Latitude Ionospheric Electric Field Variability and Impact on Joule Heating Using SuperDARN Data.

    No full text
    The most dynamic electromagnetic coupling between the magnetosphere and ionosphere occurs in the polar upper atmosphere. It is critical to quantify the electromagnetic energy and momentum input associated with this coupling as its impacts on the ionosphere and thermosphere system are global and major, often leading to considerable disturbances in near-Earth space environments. The current general circulation models of the upper atmosphere exhibit systematic biases that can be attributed to an inadequate representation of the Joule heating rate resulting from unaccounted stochastic fluctuations of electric fields associated with the magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling. These biases exist regardless of geomagnetic activity levels. To overcome this limitation, a new multiresolution random field modeling approach is developed, and the efficacy of the approach is demonstrated using Super Dual Auroral Radar Network (SuperDARN) data carefully curated for the study during a largely quiet 4-hour period on February 29, 2012. Regional small-scale electrostatic fields sampled at different resolutions from a probabilistic distribution of electric field variability conditioned on actual SuperDARN LOS observations exhibit considerably more localized fine-scale features in comparison to global large-scale fields modeled using the SuperDARN Assimilative Mapping procedure. The overall hemispherically integrated Joule heating rate is increased by a factor of about 1.5 due to the effect of random regional small-scale electric fields, which is close to the lower end of arbitrarily adjusted Joule heating multiplicative factor of 1.5 and 2.5 typically used in upper atmosphere general circulation models. The study represents an important step toward a data-driven ensemble modeling of magnetosphere-ionosphere-atmosphere coupling processes
    corecore