19 research outputs found

    Five-year effect of community-based intervention Hartslag Limburg on quality of life: A longitudinal cohort study

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>During the past decade, quality of life (QoL) has become an accepted measure of disease impact, therapeutic outcome, and evaluation of interventions. So far, very little is known about the effects of community-based interventions on people's QoL. Therefore, the effect of an integrative cardiovascular diseases community-based intervention programme 'Hartslag Limburg' on QoL after 5-years of intervention is studied.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A longitudinal cohort study comparing 5-year mean change in QoL between the intervention (n = 2356) and reference group (n = 758). QoL outcomes were the physical and mental health composite scores (PCS and MCS) measured by the RAND-36. Analyses were stratified for gender and socio-economic status (SES).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>After 5-years of intervention we found no difference in mean change in PCS and MCS between the intervention and reference group in both genders and low-SES. However, for the moderate/high SES intervention group, the scales social functioning (-3.6, 95% CI:-6.1 to -1.2), physical role limitations (-5.3, 95% CI:-9.6 to -1.0), general mental health (-3.0, 95% CI:-4.7 to -1.3), vitality (-3.2, 95% CI:-5.1 to -1.3), and MCS (-1.8, 95% CI:-2.9 to -0.6) significantly changed compared with the reference group. These differences were due to a slight decrease of QoL in the intervention group and an increase of QoL in the reference group.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Hartslag Limburg has no beneficial effect on people's physical and mental QoL after 5-years of intervention. In fact, subjects in the intervention group with a moderate/high SES, show a decrease on their mental QoL compared with the reference group.</p

    Casein kinase 1α governs antigen-receptor-induced NF-ÎșB activation and human lymphoma cell survival

    No full text
    The transcription factor NF-ÎșB is required for lymphocyte activation and proliferation as well as the survival of certain lymphoma types1, 2. Antigen receptor stimulation assembles an NF-ÎșB activating platform containing the scaffold protein CARMA1/CARD11, the adaptor BCL10, and the paracaspase MALT1 (CBM complex), linked to the inhibitor of NF-ÎșB kinase (IKK) complex3–12, but signal transduction is not fully understood1. We conducted parallel screens involving a mass spectrometry analysis of CARMA1 binding partners and an RNAi screen for growth inhibition of the CBM-dependent “activated B cell-like” (ABC) subtype of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL)12. Here, we report that both screens identified casein kinase 1α (CK1α) as a bifunctional regulator of NF-ÎșB. CK1α dynamically associates with the CBM complex upon T cell receptor (TCR) engagement to augment cytokine production and lymphocyte proliferation. However, CK1α kinase activity plays a counterposing role by subsequently promoting the phosphorylation and inactivation of CARMA1. CK1α has thus a dual “gating” function which first promotes and then terminates receptor-induced NF-ÎșB. ABC DLBCL cells required CK1α for constitutive NF-ÎșB activity indicating that CK1α functions as a “conditionally essential malignancy” (CEMal) gene - a member of a new class of potential cancer therapeutic targets

    Classification and nomenclature of metacaspases and paracaspases : no more confusion with caspases

    No full text
    Metacaspases and paracaspases are proteases that were first identified as containing a caspase-like structural fold (Uren et al., 2000). Like caspases, meta- and paracaspases are multifunctional proteins regulating diverse biological phenomena, such as aging, immunity, proteostasis and programmed cell death. The broad phylogenetic distribution of meta- and paracaspases across all kingdoms of life and large variation of their biochemical and structural features complicate classification and annotation of the rapidly growing number of identified homologs. Establishment of an adequate classification and unified nomenclature of meta- and paracaspases is especially important to avoid frequent confusion of these proteases with caspases - a tenacious misnomer that unfortunately does not appear to decline with time. This letter represents a consensus opinion of researchers studying different aspects of caspases, meta- and paracaspases in various organisms, ranging from microbes to plants and animals
    corecore