Prognostic Significance of Negative Lymph Node Long Axis in Esophageal Cancer: Results From the Randomized Controlled UK MRC OE02 Trial

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the relationship between negative lymph node (LNneg) size as a possible surrogate marker of the host antitumor immune response and overall survival (OS) in esophageal cancer (EC) patients. BACKGROUND: Lymph node (LN) status is a well-established prognostic factor in EC patients. An increased number of LNnegs is related to better survival in EC. Follicular hyperplasia in LNneg is associated with better survival in cancer-bearing mice and might explain increased LN size. METHODS: The long axis of 304 LNnegs was measured in hematoxylin-eosin stained sections from resection specimens of 367 OE02 trial patients (188 treated with surgery alone (S), 179 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery (C+S)) as a surrogate of LN size. The relationship between LNneg size, LNneg microarchitecture, clinicopathological variables, and OS was analyzed. RESULTS: Large LNneg size was related to lower pN category (P = 0.01) and lower frequency of lymphatic invasion (P = 0.02) in S patients only. Irrespective of treatment, (y)pN0 patients with large LNneg had the best OS. (y)pN1 patients had the poorest OS irrespective of LNneg size (P < 0.001). Large LNneg contained less lymphocytes (P = 0.02) and had a higher germinal centers/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to investigate LNneg size in EC patients randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or surgery alone. Our pilot study suggests that LNneg size is a surrogate marker of the host antitumor immune response and a potentially clinically useful new prognostic biomarker for (y)pN0 EC patients. Future studies need to confirm our results and explore underlying biological mechanisms

Lymph node response to chemoradiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients: relationship with radiotherapy fields

Background The presence of lymph node metastasis (LNmets) is a poor prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer (OeC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) followed by surgery. Tumour regression grade (TRG) in LNmets has been suggested as a predictor for survival. The aim of this study was to investigate whether TRG in LNmets is related to their location within the radiotherapy (RT) field. Methods Histopathological TRG was retrospectively classified in 2565 lymph nodes (LNs) from 117 OeC patients treated with nCRT and surgery as: (A) no tumour, no signs of regression; (B) tumour without regression; (C) viable tumour and regression; and (D) complete response. Multivariate survival analysis was used to investigate the relationship between LN location within the RT field, pathological TRG of the LN and TRG of the primary tumour. Results In 63 (54%) patients, viable tumour cells or signs of regression were seen in 264 (10.2%) LNs which were classified as TRG-B (n = 56), C (n = 104) or D (n = 104) LNs. 73% of B, C and D LNs were located within the RT field. There was a trend towards a relationship between LN response and anatomical LN location with respect to the RT field (p = 0.052). Multivariate analysis showed that only the presence of LNmets within the RT field with TRG-B is related to poor overall survival. Conclusion Patients have the best survival if all LNmets show tumour regression, even if LNmets are located outside the RT field. Response in LNmets to nCRT is heterogeneous which warrants further studies to better understand underlying mechanisms

Large negative lymph nodes – a surrogate for immune activation in rectal cancer patients?

Aim: The size of regional, tumor draining lymph nodes without metastasis (LNneg) found in rectal cancer resection specimens varies and seems to be related to patient survival. Yet, the histopathological features influencing LNneg size in rectal cancer have not been studied in detail. Our pilot study focused on investigating the relationship between lymph node (LN) size and LNneg microarchitecture in rectal cancer (RC) resection specimens. Method: In this retrospective cohort study, resection specimens from 146 RC patients, treated with either surgery alone (n = 29) or neoadjuvant therapy followed by resection (n = 117), were included in the study. Histology of LNnegs was reviewed to establish number of lymphoid follicles and presence of intranodal fat. Longest long axis and area of each LN were measured digitally. Results: 1830 LNnegs were measured. The microarchitecture was analyzed in a subset of 680 LNnegs. 153 (22.5 %) LNnegs contained intranodal fat. After neoadjuvant treatment, presence of intranodal fat was related to smaller LNneg area (median (range) area of LNneg without intranodal fat: 4.51 mm2 (0.15-46.89 mm2), with intranodal fat: 3.46 mm2 (0.12-27.22 mm2), p = 0.048). A higher number of lymphoid follicles was related to a larger LNneg area in both patient groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Our pilot data suggest that in rectal cancer the presence of large regional LNnegs may reflect increased immune activation due to tumor related antigens. Further studies are warranted to investigate whether histologically visible microarchitectural features of LNnegs such as lymphoid follicles translate to particular features in radiological images and hence could potentially help to identify LNneg with more certainty at the time of pre-treatment disease staging