The Liquidity Premium in Equity Pricing under a Continuous Auction System.

The paper shows that the cost of illiquidity is not (positively) priced over all months in the Spanish continuous auction system, where liquidity is provideh in the absence of market makers. Two distinct approaches are employed. Both the two-step traditional cross-sectional method and the pooled cross-section time series analysis tend to indicate that the liquidity premium is negative during months other than January. Morever, the liquidity premium in January is positive (although not significant) and at the 10% level it seems to be significantly higher than the liquidity premium over the rest of the year. Therefore, given the previous results for the US market, we conclude that, independently of the market trading mechanism with the exception of NASDAQ, the behaviour of the relationship between the bid-ask spread and stock returns is rather similar.asset pricing; market microstructure; liquidity premium;

Adverse selection, volume and transactions around dividend announcements in a continuous auction system.

We show that liquidity providers do not significantly respond to changes in information asymmetry risks, at least when we analyse their trading behaviour around dividend announcements of a representative sample of stocks in a continuous auction trading mechanism. the implicit bid-ask spread does not seem to change beyond what is normally conveyed through an increased number of transactions. We also document that the information in the trading behaviour of investors is primarily contained in the number of daily transactions.adverse selection; bid-ask spread; limit orders; dividend announcements;

Understanding the ex-ante cost of liquidity in the limit order book: a note.

El presente trabajo estima una nueva medida de coste de liquidez de los activos financieros en un mercado dirigido por órdenes. Esta medida, denominada función de liquidez, recoge el coste ex-ante de comprar y vender simultáneamente una determinada cantidad de acciones haciendo uso de toda la información ofrecida por el libro de órdenes. De esta manera se superan las dificultades que la consideración por separado de la horquilla de precios o la profundidad ocasiona sobre la caracterización de la liquidez de los diferentes activos.This paper estimates a new measure of liquidity costs in a market driven by orders. It represents the cost of simultaneously buying and selling a given amount of shares, and it is given by a single measure of ex-ante liquidity that aggregates all available information in the limit order book for a given number of shares. The cost of liquidity is an increasing function relating bid-ask spreads with the amounts available for trading. This measure completely characterizes the cost of liquidity of any given asset. It does not suffer from the usual ambiguities related to either the bid-ask spread or depth when they are considered separately. On the contrary, with a single measure, we are able to capture all dimensions of liquidity costs on ex-ante basis.Función de liquidez; Coste de liquidez; Libro de órdenes límite; Horquilla de precios; Profundidad; liquidity function; liquidity cost; open limit order book; bid-ask spread; depth;

Asset pricing and systematic liquidity risk: An empirical investigation of the Spanish stock market.

Systematic liquidity shocks should affect the optimal behavior of agents in financial markets. Indeed, fluctuations in various measures of liquidity are significantly correlated across common stocks. Accordingly, this paper empirically analyzes whether Spanish average returns vary cross sectionally with betas estimated relative to three competing liquidity risk factors. The first one, proposed by Pastor and Stambaugh (2003), is associated with the temporary price fluctuation reversals induced by the order flow. Our market-wide liquidity factor is defined as the difference between returns highly sensitive to changes in the relative bid–ask spread and returns with low sensitivities to those changes. Finally, the aggregate ratio of absolute stock returns to euro volume, as suggested by Amihud [J. Financ. Mark. 5 (2002) 31], is also employed. Our empirical results show that systematic liquidity risk is significantly priced in the Spanish stock market exclusively when betas are measured relative to the illiquidity risk factor based on the price response to one euro of trading volume on either unconditional or conditional versions of liquidity-based asset pricing models.Systematic liquidity risk; Expected returns; Bid–ask spread; Order flow; Trading volume;

Understanding the ex-ante cost of liquidity in the limit order book: A note

This paper estimates a new measure of liquidity costs in a market driven by orders. It represents thecost of simultaneously buying and selling a given amount of shares, and it is given by a single measure of ex-ante liquidity that aggregates all available information in the limit order book for a given number of shares. The cost of liquidity is an increasing function relating bid-ask spreads with the amounts available for trading. This measure completely characterizes the cost of liquidity of any given asset. It does not suffer from the usual ambiguities related to either the bid-ask spread or depth when they are considered separately. On the contrary, with a single measure, we are able to capture all dimensions of liquidity costs on ex-ante basis.liquidity cost, liquidity function, open limit order book, depth, bid ask spread

ASSET PRICING AND SYSTEMATIC LIQUIDITY RISK: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE SPANISH STOCK MARKET

It seems reasonable to expect systematic liquidity shocks to affect the optimal behavior of agents in financial markets. Indeed, fluctuations in various measures of liquidity are significantly correlated across common stocks(Chordia, Roll and Subrahmanyam (2000)). Thus, this paper empirically analyzes whether Spanish expected returns during the nineties are associated cross-sectionally to betas estimated relative to two competing liquidity risk factors. On one hand, we propose a new market-wide liquidity factor which is defined as the difference between returns of stocks highly sensitive to changes in the relative bid-ask spread less returns from stocks with low sensitivities to those changes. We argue that stocks with positive covariability between returns and this factor are assets whose returns tend to go down when aggregate liquidity is low, and hence do not hedge a potential liquidity crisis. Consequently, investors will require a premium to hold these assets. Similarly, note that in the case of assets that covary negatively with the liquidity factor, investors may be willing to pay a premium rather than to require an additional compensation. On the other hand, Pastor and Stambaugh (2002) suggest that a reasonable liquidity risk factor should be associated with the strength of volume-related return reversals since order flow induces greater return reversals when liquidity is lower. Our empirical results show that neither of these proxies for systematic liquidity risk carries a premium in the Spanish stock market.

Cambios de transparencia en la subasta de preapertura.

Este trabajo analiza las consecuencias que el cambio en el nivel de transparencia de un mercado financiero tiene sobre el proceso de aprendizaje de los inversores. Para ello analizamos el cambio de nivel de transparencia ex-ante que se produjo en la preapertura de la Bolsa de Madrid el 1 de junio de 2000 con el fin de armonizar las reglas del mecanismo de subasta respecto al resto de países europeos. A partir de ese día el sistema de preapertura de la Bolsa de Madrid dejó de mostrar los cinco niveles del libro de órdenes o el libro completo para los miembros de mercado para pasar a mostrar únicamente el primer nivel y, consecuentemente, el precio y cantidad de equilibrio.

The Liquidity Premium in Equity Pricing under a Continuous Auction System

The paper shows that the cost of illiquidity is not (positively) priced over all months in the Spanish continuous auction system, where liquidity is provideh in the absence of market makers. Two distinct approaches are employed. Both the two-step traditional cross-sectional method and the pooled cross-section time series analysis tend to indicate that the liquidity premium is negative during months other than January. Morever, the liquidity premium in January is positive (although not significant) and at the 10% level it seems to be significantly higher than the liquidity premium over the rest of the year. Therefore, given the previous results for the US market, we conclude that, independently of the market trading mechanism with the exception of NASDAQ, the behaviour of the relationship between the bid-ask spread and stock returns is rather similar.Publicad

The liquidity premiun in equity pricing under a continuous auction system

This paper shows that the cost of iliquidity is not (positiveley) priced over all months in the Spanish continuous auction system where Iiquidity is provided in the absence of market makers. Two distinct approaches are employed. Both the two-step traditional cross-sectional method and the pooled cross-section time series analysis tend to indicate that the liquidity premium is negative during months other than January. Morever, the Iiquidity premium in January is positive (although not significant) and at the 10 per cent level it seems to be significantly higher than the liquidity premium over the rest of the year. Therefore, given the previous results for the US market, we conclude that, independently of the market trading mechanism, the behavior of the relationship between the bid-ask spread and stock retums is rather similar

Cambios de transparencia en la subasta de preapertura

Este trabajo analiza las consecuencias que el cambio en el nivel de transparencia de un mercado financiero tiene sobre el proceso de aprendizaje de los inversores. Para ello analizamos el cambio de nivel de transparencia ex-ante que se produjo en la preapertura de la Bolsa de Madrid el 1 de junio de 2000 con el fin de armonizar las reglas del mecanismo de subasta respecto al resto de países europeos. A partir de ese día el sistema de preapertura de la Bolsa de Madrid dejó de mostrar los cinco niveles del libro de órdenes o el libro completo para los miembros de mercado para pasar a mostrar únicamente el primer nivel y, consecuentemente, el precio y cantidad de equilibrio.Publicad