Heat sterilizable Ni-Cd battery development Quarterly report, 1 Jul. - 30 Sep. 1967

Effect of heat sterilization on electrochemistry of nickel-cadmium batterie

Heat sterilizable Ni-Cd battery development Quarterly progress report, 1 Oct. - 31 Dec. 1967

Microscopic, X ray diffraction, porosity, and pore size distribution data for heat sterilizable Ni-Cd batter

Extra dimensions as a source of the electroweak model

The Higgs boson of the Standard model is described by a set of off-diagonal components of the multidimensional metric tensor, as well as the gauge fields. In the low-energy limit, the basic properties of the Higgs boson are reproduced, including the shape of the potential and interactions with the gauge fields of the electroweak part of the Standard model.Comment: 11 pages, revtex4. Some wording changed, misprints corrected, 1 reference adde

EPR experiment and 2-photon interferometry: Report of a 2-photon interference experiment

After a very brief review of the historical Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) experiments, a new two-photon interference type EPR experiment is reported. A two-photon state was generated by optical parametric down conversion. Pairs of light quanta with degenerate frequency but divergent directions of propagation were sent to two independent Michelson interferometers. First and second order interference effectors were studied. Different than other reports, we observed that the second order interference visibility vanished when the optical path difference of the interferometers were much less than the coherence length of the pumping laser beam. However, we also observed that the second order interference behaved differently depending on whether the interferometers were set at equal or different optical path differences

Comment on ``Dispersion-Independent High-Visibility Quantum Interference ... "

We show in this Comment that the interpretation of experimental data as well as the theory presented in Atat\"ure et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 618 (2000)] are incorrect and discuss why such a scheme cannot be used to "recover" high-visibility quantum interference.Comment: Comment on Atat\"ure et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 618 (2000)], 2nd revision, To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett. April, (2001