28 research outputs found

    Macrocolony of NDM-1 producing Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. oharae generates subpopulations with different features regarding the response of antimicrobial agents and biofilm formation

    Get PDF
    Enterobacter cloacae complex has been increasingly recognized as a nosocomial pathogen representing the third major Enterobacteriaceae species involved with infections. This study aims to evaluate virulence and antimicrobial susceptibility of subpopulations generated from macrocolonies of NDM-1 producing Enterobacter hormaechei clinical isolates. Biofilm was quantified using crystal violet method and fimbrial genes were investigated by PCR. Susceptibility of antimicrobials, alone and combined, was determined by minimum inhibitory concentration and checkerboard assays, respectively. Virulence and efficacy of antimicrobials were evaluated in Galleria mellonella larvae. Importantly, we verified that some subpopulations that originate from the same macrocolony present different biofilm production ability and distinct susceptibility to meropenem due to the loss of blaNDM-1 encoding plasmid. A more in-depth study was performed with the 798 macrocolony subpopulations. Type 3 fimbriae were straightly related with biofilm production; however, virulence in larvae was not statistically different among subpopulations. Triple combination with meropenem–rifampicin–polymyxin B showed in vitro synergistic effect against all subpopulations; while in vivo this treatment showed different efficacy rates for 798-1S and 798-4S subpopulations. The ability of multidrug resistant E. hormaechei isolates in generating bacterial subpopulations presenting different susceptible and virulence mechanisms are worrisome and may explain why these infections are hardly overcome

    Performance of rapid tests for carbapenemase detection among Brazilian Enterobacteriaceae isolates

    Get PDF
    The global emergence of carbapenemases led to the need of developing new methods for their rapid detection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the rapid tests for carbapenemase-producing and non-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Carbapenem non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae from a surveillance study submitted to a multiplex real time PCR for carbapenemase detection were included in this study. The isolates were subjected to the rapid phenotypic tests Carba NP, Blue-Carba and Carbapenem Inactivation Method (CIM). A total of 83 carbapenemase-producing (43) and non-producing (40) isolates were included in the study. The sensitivity/specificity were 62.7%/97.5%, 95.3%/100%, and 74.4%/97.5% for Carba NP, Blue-Carba and CIM, respectively. Both Carba NP and Blue-Carba presented their final results after 75 min of incubation; the final results for CIM were obtained only after 8 h. Failure to detect OXA-370 carbapenemase was the main problem for Carba NP and CIM assays. As the Blue-Carba presented the highest sensitivity, it can be considered the best screening test. Conversely, CIM might be the easiest to perform, as it does not require special reagents. The early detection of carbapenemases aids to establish infection control measures and prevent carbapenemases to spread reducing the risk of healthcare associated infections and therapeutic failure

    Real Time -PCR and NESTED-PCR to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary samples

    No full text
    A tuberculose (TB) é um importante problema de saúde pública, portanto, é necessário o desenvolvimento de novas ferramentas para a detecção rápida e confiável do Mycobacterium tuberculosis, prevenindo a transmissão da TB. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar dois testes moleculares para detecção de bactérias do Complexo Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTBC) diretamente de amostras clínicas. Foi realizado um estudo transversal, no qual foram selecionadas 124 amostras respiratórias. As amostras foram avaliadas por dois testes moleculares “in house” para detecção do MTBC: NESTED-PCR (NPCR) e Real Time PCR (RT-PCR) ambos com primers para o IS6110. As amostras também foram avaliadas por um teste direto (pesquisa de BAAR). Os resultados foram comparados com a cultura para M.tuberculosis e também com os resultados da cultura juntamente com dados clínicos. Uma amostra comercial com quantificação de DNA conhecida foi utilizada para determinação do Limite de Detecção (LOD) dos testes moleculares. O LOD foi de 1 cópia/μL para o RT-PCR e de 25 cópias/μL para o NPCR. O BAAR apresentou baixa sensibilidade - SE - (40%) e alta especificidade - SP - (94%). Ambos os ensaios moleculares, apresentaram elevada SE e SP (RT-PCR 98% e 91%, NPCR 86% e 93%, respectivamente) em relação à cultura. Quando comparamos os resultados frente a cultura juntamente com os dados clínicos, a SE e a SP foram de 90% e 97% para a RT-PCR e de 80% e 99% para a NPCR, respectivamente. Houve um pequeno decréscimo da SE dos métodos moleculares, quando comparados com a cultura mais os dados clínicos em relação à cultura isoladamente, no entanto, a SP foi consideravelmente elevada para os três métodos avaliados. Avaliamos o custo dos insumos para os ensaios moleculares: o custo do NPCR foi de 17.77/testeenquantoqueocustodoRTPCRfoide 17.77/teste enquanto que o custo do RT-PCR foi de 15.76/teste. Em relação ao tempo de execução dos testes o RT-PCR foi mais rápido (2 horas) do que o NPCR (4 horas). Este estudo confirma que técnicas de PCRs podem ser muito úteis para o diagnóstico rápido da TB respiratória, com altas taxas de SP. Ele também pode ser muito importante para a exclusão de diagnóstico, considerando o alto VPN encontrados no nosso estudo. Os resultados demonstraram que os ensaios moleculares visando IS6110 do M. tuberculosis podem ajudar a melhorar o diagnóstico da TB pulmonar, com muitos potenciais efeitos positivos para a gestão clínica e de controle da doença.Tuberculosis (TB) remains as an important public health problem worldwide. Therefore, the rapid detection of M. tuberculosis is of primary importance to effectively reduce transmission among patients. The aims of this study were to evaluate two molecular tests to detect M. tuberculosis complex (MTBC) directly from clinical samples. The study included 124 respiratory samples which were evaluated by two in house molecular assays for MTBC detection: Nested PCR (NPCR) and Real Time PCR (RT-PCR). The respiratory samples were also evaluated by the direct test (AFB assay). The results were compared with the results of culture and also compared with the culture results plus clinical data of patients. We used a commercial DNA sample with known quantification to establish the Limit of Detection (LOD). The LOD was 1 copy/μL for RT-PCR and 25 copies/μL for NPCR. The AFB assay presented low sensitivity – SE - (40%) and a high specificity - SP – (94%). Both molecular assays, RT-PCR and NPCR presented high SE and SP (RT-PCR 98% and 91%, NPCR 86% and 93%, respectively) compared to culture. When the results of the molecular tests were compared to the culture plus clinical data the SE and SP were 90,20% and 97,26% for RT-PCR and 80,39% and 98,63% for the NPCR, respectively. It was possible to observe a slight decrease of SE of the molecular methods in comparison to culture plus clinical data in relation to culture; however, the SP was increased, since many cases of TB could not be confirmed by culture. Furthermore we evaluated the cost of molecular assays: the NPCR cost was 17.77/testwhiletheRTPCRcostwas17.77/test while the RT-PCR cost was 15.76/test. The RT-PCR test was faster (2 hours) than the NPCR (4 hours) to be performed. Our study confirms that PCRs may be useful for rapid diagnosis of respiratory TB, with high SP rates. It may also be very important to exclude such diagnosis, considering the high NPV found in our study. In summary, PCRs targeting IS6110 of MTB improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of pulmonary TB, with many potential positive effects for clinical management and control of the disease
    corecore