Resistance to coronavirus infection in amino peptidase N-deficient pigs

The alphacoronaviruses, transmissible gastroenteritis virus (TGEV) and Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) are sources of high morbidity and mortality in neonatal pigs, a consequence of dehydration caused by the infection and necrosis of enterocytes. The biological relevance of amino peptidase N (ANPEP) as a putative receptor for TGEV and PEDV in pigs was evaluated by using CRISPR/Cas9 to edit exon 2 of ANPEP resulting in a premature stop codon. Knockout pigs possessing the null ANPEP phenotype and age matched wild type pigs were challenged with either PEDV or TGEV. Fecal swabs were collected daily from each animal beginning 1 day prior to challenge with PEDV until the termination of the study. The presence of virus nucleic acid was determined by PCR. ANPEP null pigs did not support infection with TGEV, but retained susceptibility to infection with PEDV. Immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of PEDV reactivity and absence of TGEV reactivity in the enterocytes lining the ileum in ANPEP null pigs. The different receptor requirements for TGEV and PEDV have important implications in the development of new genetic tools for the control of enteric disease in pigs

Evaluation of the Risk of PRRSV Transmission via Ingestion of Muscle from Persistently Infected Pigs

The objectives of this experiment were to determine how long porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) could be detected in muscle tissues of experimentally infected pigs and to evaluate the transmissibility of PRRSV to pigs via ingestion of quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-positive muscle tissues. Serum, lymphoid tissues, and muscle (M. longissimus dorsi) samples were collected from 135 pigs (89 PRRSV-inoculated pigs and 46 negative control). Between 28 and 202 days post-inoculation, 13 of 89 (14.6%) muscle samples were positive by qRT-PCR. Among these 13, PRRSV was isolated from four of the 13 corresponding serum samples and three of 13 lymphoid tissue samples. In addition, infectious virus was detected in lymphoid tissue homogenates of six of 13 pigs by intramuscular bioassay. Swine transmissibility studies were performed by feeding thirteen 3-week-old PRRSV-naive pigs (recipient pigs) qRT-PCR-positive muscle and then monitoring recipients for evidence of PRRSV viremia by qRT-PCR. No transmission of PRRSV to recipient pigs via consumption of muscle samples was observed. These data suggested that qRT-PCR detected non-infectious PRRSV in pig meat and/or PRRSV is not highly transmissible to susceptible pigs via consumption of PRRSV-contaminated meat

Immune Response Against Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus During Acute and Chronic Infection

A significant obstacle to the prevention and control of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) is the inability of current diagnostic tests to provide information concerning the stage of PRRSV infection. To explore possible prognostic combinations of cell-mediated and humoral immune responses, 3-week-old pigs (n = 10) were intramuscularly (IM) inoculated with PRRSV isolate VR-2332 and followed for 193 days post-inoculation (DPI). Negative control pigs (n = 10) were IM inoculated with minimum essential medium (MEM). At ∼2-week intervals, blood samples were collected from all animals and tested for the number of interferon (IFN)-γ-secreting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot, Elispot), PRRSV viremia (quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, qRT-PCR), and serum antibodies using PRRSV protein ELISAs (N, GP5 3′, GP5 5′, M 5′, M 3′, GP5-M, and nsp2p) and a commercial PRRSV ELISA (IDEXX Laboratories Inc.). All pigs were viremic by 7 days post-inoculation, with 50% of the pigs resolving viremia by 56 DPI. A PRRSV-specific IFN-γ response was detected at DPI 28, reached a plateau at 42 DPI, declined slightly, and remained relatively stable from 56 to 193 DPI. On the basis of ROC area under the curve (AUC) analysis, the ELISAs that most reliably differentiated PRRSV-inoculated pigs from negative control pigs were the commercial ELISA (AUC = 0.97), the N ELISA (AUC = 0.96), and the M 3′ ELISA (AUC = 0.93). Multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the relationship between the immune response and the duration and level of viremia. With all antibody assays and Elispot included in the models, the analysis determined that the serum-virus neutralizing antibody response was the best predictor of both level and duration of viremia. It was concluded that humoral antibody responses, particularly the commercial ELISA, N ELISA, and M 3′ ELISA were good predictors of prior exposure to PRRSV, but provided little information regarding the ontogeny of the protective immune response. Likewise, cell-mediated immunity based on the number of IFN-γ-secreting lymphocytes was a poor prognosticator of PRRSV infection status