Ngununggula: The story of a cancer care team for aboriginal people

In Dharawal Country in regional New South Wales, a small and powerful team provides cancer prevention, screening, support and care for Australian Aboriginal people, their families and communities. In keeping with Aboriginal practices and values, their uniquely holistic approach encompasses everything from food security and finding childcare, to support at diagnosis, surgical, radiation or chemo treatment, through to holding funerals, facilitating yarning groups, and Ceremony for survivors of cancer and their carers. The team created a manual for Aboriginal Health Workers, and other staff of Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services, together with training webinars, and modules. The program is also designed for Aboriginal Liaison Officers and Palliative Care Workers who work in hospitals. The book and the training modules are called Ngununggula. The name, from the Gundungurra language, means working and walking together. “We’ll make ourselves available to anyone that wants to tread this path because we know all the pitfalls. We’ve learned them. We’ve tripped and had to climb out of them again. Anyone that wants the shortcuts—more learning, less pain—here they are. We want to share and help. I want the message to get out all over the place. I want to share the resources, to support anyone else who wants to run programs or build a team like we do.” Kyla Wynn, Counsellor/Co-ordinator Cancer Care Team, Illawarra Aboriginal Medical Service. Partners include: Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council, Illawarra Aboriginal Medical Service, University of Sydney, University of Wollongong, Menzies School of Health Research

Are patients willing participants in the new wave of community-based medical education in regional and rural Australia?

Community-based medical education is escalating to meet the increased demand for quality clinical education in expanded settings and patient participation is vital to the sustainability of this endeavour. This study aimed to investigate patients’ views on being used as an educational resource in medical student teaching, and whether they are being under- or over-used

Patients\u27 attitudes towards chaperone use for intimate physical examinations in general practice

BACKGROUND: The objective of this article is to investigate patients\u27 attitudes to the use of chaperones for intimate physical examinations (IPEs) in a sample of Australian general practices. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of adult patients from 13 randomly selected general practices in regional New South Wales was conducted between September and November 2012. Generalised linear mixed models were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of 780 surveys distributed, 687 (88%) were returned; the age range was 18-91 years and 356 (52%) were from female patients. Most women had never had a chaperone present for a Papanicolaou (Pap) smear (82.6%). Between 23% and 33% of respondents preferred a chaperone with their usual general practitioner (GP) across IPEs and gender of the respondents. The odds of preference for a chaperone were significantly less with a GP whom the respondents did not know well, compared with their usual GP, for a Pap smear (female) or genital examination (male). DISCUSSION: Individualised discussion regarding chaperone use for IPEs is warranted, especially with patients seeing their usual GP

Supporting Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services to deliver alcohol care : Protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial

Introduction Indigenous peoples who have experienced colonisation or oppression can have a higher prevalence of alcohol-related harms. In Australia, Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services (ACCHSs) offer culturally accessible care to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) peoples. However there are many competing health, socioeconomic and cultural client needs. Methods and analysis A randomised cluster wait-control trial will test the effectiveness of a model of tailored and collaborative support for ACCHSs in increasing use of alcohol screening (with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C)) and of treatment provision (brief intervention, counselling or relapse prevention medicines). Setting Twenty-two ACCHSs across Australia. Randomisation Services will be stratified by remoteness, then randomised into two groups. Half receive support soon after the trial starts (intervention or ‘early support’); half receive support 2 years later (wait-control or ‘late support’). The support Core support elements will be tailored to local needs and include: support to nominate two staff as champions for increasing alcohol care; a national training workshop and bimonthly teleconferences for service champions to share knowledge; onsite training, and bimonthly feedback on routinely collected data on screening and treatment provision. Outcomes and analysis Primary outcome is use of screening using AUDIT-C as routinely recorded on practice software. Secondary outcomes are recording of brief intervention, counselling, relapse prevention medicines; and blood pressure, gamma glutamyltransferase and HbA1c. Multi-level logistic regression will be used to test the effectiveness of support. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval has been obtained from eight ethics committees: the Aboriginal Health and Medical Research Council of New South Wales (1217/16); Central Australian Human Research Ethics Committee (CA-17-2842); Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (2017-2737); Central Queensland Hospital and Health Service (17/QCQ/9); Far North Queensland (17/QCH/45-1143); Aboriginal Health Research Ethics Committee, South Australia (04-16-694); St Vincent’s Hospital (Melbourne) Human Research Ethics Committee (LRR 036/17); and Western Australian Aboriginal Health Ethics Committee (779). Trial registration number ACTRN12618001892202; Pre-results

Using breath carbon monoxide to validate self-reported tobacco smoking in remote Australian Indigenous communities

Background: This paper examines the specificity and sensitivity of a breath carbon monoxide (BCO) test and\ud optimum BCO cutoff level for validating self-reported tobacco smoking in Indigenous Australians in Arnhem Land,\ud Northern Territory (NT).\ud \ud Methods: In a sample of 400 people (≥16 years) interviewed about tobacco use in three communities, both selfreported\ud smoking and BCO data were recorded for 309 study participants. Of these, 249 reported smoking tobacco\ud within the preceding 24 hours, and 60 reported they had never smoked or had not smoked tobacco for ≥6\ud months. The sample was opportunistically recruited using quotas to reflect age and gender balances in the\ud communities where the combined Indigenous populations comprised 1,104 males and 1,215 females (≥16 years).\ud Local Indigenous research workers assisted researchers in interviewing participants and facilitating BCO tests using\ud a portable hand-held analyzer.\ud \ud Results: A BCO cutoff of ≥7 parts per million (ppm) provided good agreement between self-report and BCO\ud (96.0% sensitivity, 93.3% specificity). An alternative cutoff of ≥5 ppm increased sensitivity from 96.0% to 99.6% with no change in specificity (93.3%). With data for two self-reported nonsmokers who also reported that they smoked\ud cannabis removed from the analysis, specificity increased to 96.6%.\ud \ud Conclusion: In these disadvantaged Indigenous populations, where data describing smoking are few, testing for\ud BCO provides a practical, noninvasive, and immediate method to validate self-reported smoking. In further studies\ud of tobacco smoking in these populations, cannabis use should be considered where self-reported nonsmokers\ud show high BCO

A review of tobacco interventions for Indigenous Australians

Abstract Objective:To conduct a review of interventions to reduce the harm resulting from tobacco use among Indigenous Australians and to discuss the likely effect of a range of tobacco interventions if conducted in this population. Methods:A systematic review of medical literature and an audit of information from 32 government departments, non‐government organisations and Indigenous health organisations, which was completed in March 2001. Results:A number of small tobacco programs had been conducted. Only four tobacco interventions had been evaluated in Indigenous communities: a trial of training health professionals in conducting a brief intervention for smoking cessation; a trial of a CD‐ROM on tobacco for use with Indigenous schoolchildren; a qualitative evaluation of the effect of a mainstream advertising campaign on Indigenous people; and a pilot study of smoke‐free workplaces, evaluated by qualitative methods. None of these studies assessed smoking cessation as an outcome. Two of these studies were unable to conclusively show any effect of the interventions; training health professionals in delivering a brief intervention resulted in some changes to practice and the evaluation of the mainstream advertising campaign showed that following the campaign, knowledge about tobacco had increased. Conclusions:There was a major lack of research on and evaluation of tobacco interventions for Indigenous Australians. Implications:More research and evaluation is required to ensure that tobacco interventions are appropriate and effective for Indigenous people. It is time to cease chronicling the ill health of Indigenous Australians and time to ensure the availability of well‐evaluated, effective tobacco programs