11 research outputs found

    Willebrordi Snellii Descriptio Cometæ, qui anno 1618 mense Novembri primùm effulsit : Huc accessit Christophori Rhotmanni Ill. Princ. Wilhelmi Hassiæ Lantgravii Mathmatici descriptio accurata cometæ anni 1585

    No full text
    Nunc primum à Will. Sn. R. F. in lucem editaPaginierfehler: Seite 73 fälschlicherweise als Seite 75 paginiertSupralibros der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Zürich Exemplar der ZB Züric

    Impurity Tracking Enables Enhanced Control and Reproducibility of Hybrid Perovskite Vapor Deposition

    No full text
    Metal halide perovskite semiconductors have the potential to enable low-cost, flexible, and efficient solar cells for a wide range of applications. Physical vapor deposition by co-evaporation of precursors is a method that results in very smooth and pinhole-free perovskite thin films and allows excellent control over film thickness and composition. However, for a deposition method to become industrially scalable, reproducible process control and high device yields are essential. Unfortunately, to date, the control and reproducibility of evaporating organic precursors such as methylammonium iodide (MAI) have proved extremely challenging. We show that the established method of controlling the evaporation rate of MAI with quartz microbalances (QMBs) is critically sensitive to the concentration of the impurities MAH2PO3 and MAH2PO2 that are usually present in MAI after synthesis. Therefore, controlling the deposition rate of MAI with QMBs is unreliable since the concentration of such impurities typically varies from one batch of MAI to another and even during the course of a deposition. However once reliable control of MAI deposition is achieved, we find that the presence of precursor impurities during perovskite deposition does not degrade the solar cell performance. Our results indicate that as long as precursor deposition rates are well controlled, physical vapor deposition will allow high solar cell device yields even if the purity of precursors changes from one run to another

    The multicentre, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical-trial (Pre-GvHD) for prediction and pre-emptive treatment of acute GvHD [Abstract]

    No full text
    Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a curative treatment for adult patients with hematologic malignancies, but is limited by severe, life-threatening complications such as acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD). We have developed a proteomic urine pattern “aGvHD_MS17”, consisting of 17 differentially excreted peptides, capable to predict aGvHD grade II or more (1, 2). In 2008, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double blind clinical trial (Pre-GvHD) was initiated testing aGvHD_MS17 for prediction of aGvHD and to initiate pre-emptive therapy using prednisolone 2-2.5mg/kg. Patients and Methods: Eleven German transplant-centres contributed 267 patients. Urine was collected weekly from day +7 to +35 and on days +50 and +80 (all +/-3 days) frozen, shipped to Hannover and analyzed using capillary electrophoresis coupled on-line to mass spectrometry (CE-MS) within 72h as described (1). aGvHD_MS17 was considered positive, when the dimensionless classification factor (CF) was +0.1 or more. Eight patients were excluded from analyses, either due to no medication (n=5) or protocol violations (n=3) and 92 were randomized according to the positivity of aGvHD-MS17 to receive either prednisolone (2-2.5mg/kg, n=44) or placebo (n=48) for 5 days followed by a taper for 19 days, if no aGvHD occurred. The remaining 167 patients formed the observation group according to pattern negativity. About half of the patients had acute leukemia (placebo group: n=24/48 (50%), prednisolone group: n=21/44 (50%); observation group: n= 91/167 (54%)) and were in complete remission/chronic phase (CR/CP) (placebo n=23/48 (47%), prednisolone n=27/44 (61%) and observation n=68/167 (41%). The majority was transplanted from matched donors (placebo: n=42/48 (87%); prednisolone: n=37/44 (84%); observation: 146/167 (87%), using reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RIC; 64%), and a calcineurin-inhibitor based GvHD-prophylaxis with MTX or MMF). Results: Prospective and blinded evaluation of aGvHD_MS17 revealed that the first analysis time point (day +7; range: 2-17) most accurately predicted aGvHD grade II or more with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 81% prior to clinical signs with a CF of +0.1 (2). Patients with samples positive for aGvHD_MS17 in the early analyses time points had a 21-fold higher risk to develop aGvHD grade II or more ((p<0.0001), Figure 1). By day +28 the predictive value of aGvHD_MS17 was lost. Confounding factors were conditioning with RIC-protocols and early death after HSCT. Patients with one sample positive for aGvHD_MS17 had a 3-fold higher risk to die, 35% of those died prior to day +500, compared to only 10% of the patients with negative samples. Analysis of pre-emptive therapy using prednisolone revealed that the incidence and severity of acute GvHD was not significantly different between the placebo and prednisolone arm suggesting that prednisolone 2-2.5mg/kg was insufficient to prevent aGvHD in this setting. Further analyses of aGvHD according to organ manifestation are ongoing. The occurrence of aGvHD after a positive proteomic pattern test in the placebo group of this trial was lower than in the previous pilot study. Possible reasons include different patient populations (pilot study: 18% of patients transplanted in relapse; current trial: only 4% transplanted in relapse, increasing the risk to develop aGvHD), different intestinal decontamination and GvHD prophylaxis protocols. The frequency of adverse and serious adverse events was not higher in the prednisolone arm than the placebo arm. No specific safety risk of the pre-emptive therapy with prednisolone was identified. Conclusions: Taken together our results indicate that pre-emptive treatment of imminent aGvHD based on proteomic-pattern-diagnostic with prednisolone 2-2.5mg/kg appears to be safe, but did not influence severity or incidence of aGvHD grade II or more. The prospective evaluation of aGvHD_MS17 confirms the highly reproducible results in the early analysis time points (day +7 to +21) for prediction of aGvHD (day +7; range 2-17). Patients with aGvHD_MS17 positive samples have a 21-fold risk to develop severe GvHD (grade II-IV). Moreover, patients with one sample positive for aGvHD_MS17have a 3-fold increased risk of death by day +500 after HSCT
    corecore