RRx-001 in Refractory Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Case Report of a Partial Response after a Third Reintroduction of Platinum Doublets.

RRx-001 is a pan-active, systemically nontoxic epigenetic inhibitor under investigation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer and high-grade neuroendocrine tumors in a Phase II clinical trial entitled TRIPLE THREAT (NCT02489903), which reexposes patients to previously effective but refractory platinum doublets after treatment with RRx-001. The purpose of this case study is first to report a partial response to carboplatin and etoposide in a patient with small-cell lung cancer pretreated with RRx-001, indicating episensitization or resensitization by epigenetic mechanisms, and second to discuss the literature related to small-cell lung cancer and episensitization

No patient left behind : The promise of immune priming with epigenetic agents

Checkpoint inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies that inhibit PD-1 or CTLA-4, have revolutionized the treatment of multiple cancers. Despite the enthusiasm for the clinical successes of checkpoint inhibitors, and immunotherapy, in general, only a minority of patients with specific tumor types actually benefit from treatment. Emerging evidence implicates epigenetic alterations as a mechanism of clinical resistance to immunotherapy. This review presents evidence for that association, summarizes the epi-based mechanisms by which tumors evade immunogenic cell death, discusses epigenetic modulation as a component of an integrated strategy to boost anticancer T cell effector function in relation to a tumor immunosuppression cycle and, finally, makes the case that the success of this no-patient-left-behind strategy critically depends on the toxicity profile of the epigenetic agent(s).Peer reviewe

RRx-001 in Refractory Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Case Report of a Partial Response after a Third Reintroduction of Platinum Doublets.

RRx-001 is a pan-active, systemically nontoxic epigenetic inhibitor under investigation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer, small-cell lung cancer and high-grade neuroendocrine tumors in a Phase II clinical trial entitled TRIPLE THREAT (NCT02489903), which reexposes patients to previously effective but refractory platinum doublets after treatment with RRx-001. The purpose of this case study is first to report a partial response to carboplatin and etoposide in a patient with small-cell lung cancer pretreated with RRx-001, indicating episensitization or resensitization by epigenetic mechanisms, and second to discuss the literature related to small-cell lung cancer and episensitization

Avelumab, a PD-L1 Inhibitor, in Combination with Hypofractionated Radiotherapy and the Abscopal Effect in Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Despite the initial optimism for using immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of multiple myeloma, subsequent clinical studies have been disappointing. Preclinical studies have suggested that priming the immune system with various modalities in addition to checkpoint inhibition may overcome the relative T-cell exhaustion or senescence; however, in this small data set, radiotherapy with checkpoint inhibition did not appear to activate the antitumor immune response. Extramedullary disease (EMD) is recognized as an aggressive subentity of multiple myeloma (MM) with a need for novel therapeutic approaches. We therefore designed a proof-of-principle pilot study to evaluate the synergy between the combination of the anti-PD-L1, avelumab, and concomitant hypofractionated radiotherapy. This was a single-arm phase II Simon two-stage single center study that was prematurely terminated because of the COVID-19 pandemic after enrolling four patients. Key eligibility included patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had exhausted or were not candidates for standard therapy and had at least one lesion amenable to radiotherapy. Patients received avelumab until progression or intolerable toxicity and hypofractionated radiotherapy to a focal lesion in cycle 2. Radiotherapy was delayed until cycle 2 to allow the avelumab to reach a study state, given the important observation from previous studies that concomitant therapy is needed for the abscopal effect. At a median potential follow-up of 10.5 months, there were no objective responses, one minimal response, and two stable disease as best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-7.1 months), and no deaths occurred. There were no grade ≥3 and five grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events. Avelumab in combination with radiotherapy for patients with RRMM and EMD was associated with very modest systemic clinical benefit; however, patients did benefit as usual from local radiotherapy. Furthermore, the combination was very well tolerated compared with historical RRMM treatment regimens

Fixed Duration Combination Therapy with Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Followed By Lenalidomide Maintenance Leads to High Rates of Sustained MRD Negativity in Patients with High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Long Term Follow up of an Investigator Initiated Phase 2 Trial

Background: Patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (HR-SMM) have a 5-year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma of approximately 75% and a median time to progression of less than 2 years (Lakshman et al., Blood Cancer J 2018) (Rajkumar et al., Blood 2015). We previously reported the primary results of our phase 2 trial of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone followed by lenalidomide maintenance (KRd-R) as prevention of symptomatic multiple myeloma in patients with HR-SMM (Kazandjian et al., JAMA Onc 2021). Herein, we present follow-up data after all patients have completed lenalidomide maintenance to evaluate the durability of responses off therapy. Methods: Patients with HR-SMM based on the Mayo Clinic, PETHEMA, and/or Rajkumar, Mateos, and Landgren criteria were eligible for enrollment in this single-center phase 2 investigator-initiated study. Patients received eight 28-day cycles (induction) of carfilzomib, 20/36 mg/m 2, with dexamethasone 20/10 (days 1,2, 8, 9, 15, 16) and lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1-21), followed by 2 years of maintenance therapy with lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21). The primary endpoint was the rate of minimum residual disease negative complete responses (MRD negative CR) at the end of induction as assessed by multicolor flow cytometry (MRD sensitivity 10 -5). Secondary objectives included progression to overt clinical multiple myeloma (end-organ damage or myeloma-defining event) or death (clinical PFS) and biochemical progression (PD) by IMWG criteria (biochemical PFS). Results: A total of54 patients were enrolled and started treatment between May 29, 2012 and July 23, 2020. Full patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics were previously reported. (Kazandjian et al., JAMA Onc 2021) At the data cut-off of July 17, 2023, the median follow-up time was 60.2 months (range: 33.7 - 127.8). As previously reported, 38 patients (70.4%) achieved MRD negative CR by the end of induction. The median duration of MRD negative CR was 57.4 months (95% CI: 44.6 - 97.2). To date, durability of MRD negative CR has been observed up to 120.6 months and 21 patients (39%) have remained MRD negative for over 2 years (95% CI: 25.9 - 53.1%). (Figure 1) All patients attained a PR or better and the median duration of response has still not been reached. At 60 months, 75.1% of patients maintained their response (95% CI: 59.9 - 85.2%). The median clinical PFS has also not been reached. Only 5 out of 54 (9.3%; 95% CI: 3.1-20.3%) patients have progressed to clinical multiple myeloma. At 60 months, 92.7% of patients were free from clinical progression (95% CI: 78.1 - 97.9%). The probability of being free of clinical progression at 100 months was 78.9% (95% CI: 51.9 - 91.8%). While the median biochemical PFS has not been reached, patients who were MRD negative by the end of induction had significantly less risk of having biochemical progression compared to patients who still had measurable disease at completion of induction (median biochemical PFS NR vs. 41.8 (HR 0.168 (95% CI: 0.060 - 0.474) (P value < 0.0001) (Figure 2). As previously reported, KRd-R was well tolerated, with no grade 4 non-hematologic adverse events and manageable low-grade toxicities. Discussion: Treatment of patients with HR-SMM with KRd-R has led to deep and durable remissions. At a median of 5 years of follow-up, this trial has yet to reach a median clinical PFS, indicating success in preventing serious end organ damage. However, it is still unclear if the beneficial outcomes seen in HR-SMM interventional studies are due to treatment of more susceptible disease or inherently less aggressive disease. An abstract evaluating the genomic profile of patients from this trial has been submitted to the meeting separately. Future prospective trials must capture and eventually select HR profiles based on validated genomic signatures. This study suggests that patients who achieve MRD negative remissions after induction therapy have prolonged biochemical PFS. However, further follow-up time is needed to fully understand the rates of clinical PFS and OS. To evaluate if additional treatment duration to achieve MRD negativity would be beneficial we have designed a trial using daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone utilizing an adaptive treatment duration based on MRD status for patients with HR-SMM which is currently enrolling participants (NCT04933539)

Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance for Prevention of Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Myeloma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

High-risk smoldering myeloma has a 5-year risk of progression to symptomatic multiple myeloma of approximately 75%. Treatment with lenalidomide decreases the risk of progression; however, novel triplet regimens are superior, and earlier disease may be more treatment sensitive. To evaluate the use of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) with lenalidomide maintenance therapy as early intervention in high-risk smoldering myeloma and to determine the rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR). In this single-arm, single-center, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial, responses were evaluated at every cycle during KRd treatment and every 3 cycles subsequently. Bone marrow biopsies and imaging were performed by cycle 8 and then annually. The study enrolled patients from May 29, 2012, to July 23, 2020, at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, a highly specialized tertiary cancer center. Patient key eligibility criteria included a diagnosis of high-risk smoldering myeloma based on the Mayo Clinic, Spanish, and/or Rajkumar, Mateos, and Landgren criteria. Patients received eight 4-week cycles of intravenous carfilzomib 36 mg/m2 (first 2 doses, 20 mg/m2), dexamethasone (20 mg, cycles 1-4; 10 mg, cycles 5-8 twice weekly), and lenalidomide 25 mg (days 1-21) followed by twenty-four 28-day cycles of maintenance lenalidomide 10 mg (days 1-21). Stem cell harvest and storage were optional. The primary outcome was the MRD-negative CR rate. Key secondary outcomes included duration of MRD-negative CR and progression to multiple myeloma. A total of 54 patients (median age, 59 years [range, 40-79 years]; 30 men [55.6%]; and 2 Asian [3.7%], 15 Black [27.8%], 1 Hispanic [1.9%], and 36 White [66.7%] patients) were enrolled, with a median potential follow-up time of 31.9 months (range, 6.7-102.9 months). The MRD-negative CR rate was 70.4% (95% CI, 56.4%-82.0%), with a median sustained duration of 5.5 years (95% CI, 3.7 years to not estimable). The 8-year probability of being free from progression to multiple myeloma was 91.2% (95% CI, 67.4%-97.9%), and no deaths occurred. Nonhematologic grade 3 adverse events occurred in 21 patients (38.9%) and included thromboembolism, rash, and lung infection, with no grade 4 events. Results of this phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that treatment of high-risk smoldering myeloma with novel triplet regimens, such as KRd and lenalidomide maintenance therapy, may alter the natural history of smoldering myeloma by significantly delaying development of end-organ disease. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this favorable benefit-to-risk profile. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01572480