Characterisation of cotadutide's dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistic effects on glycaemic control using an in vivo human glucose regulation quantitative systems pharmacology model

Background and Purpose: Cotadutide is a dual GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist with balanced agonistic activity at each receptor designed to harness the advantages on promoting liver health, weight loss and glycaemic control. We characterised the effects of cotadutide on glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon over time in a quantitative manner using our glucose dynamics systems model (4GI systems model), in combination with clinical data from a multiple ascending dose/Phase 2a (MAD/Ph2a) study in overweight and obese subjects with a history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT02548585). Experimental Approach: The cotadutide PK-4GI systems model was calibrated to clinical data by re-estimating only food related parameters. In vivo cotadutide efficacy was scaled based on in vitro potency. The model was used to explore the effect of weight loss on insulin sensitivity and predict the relative contribution of the GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonistic effects on glucose. Key Results: Cotadutide MAD/Ph2a clinical endpoints were successfully predicted. The 4GI model captured a positive effect of weight loss on insulin sensitivity and showed that the stimulating effect of glucagon on glucose production counteracts the GLP-1 receptor-mediated decrease in glucose, resulting in a plateau for glucose decrease around a 200-μg cotadutide dose. Conclusion and Implications: The 4GI quantitative systems pharmacology model was able to predict the clinical effects of cotadutide on glucose, insulin, GLP-1, glucagon and GIP given known in vitro potency. The analyses demonstrated that the quantitative systems pharmacology model, and its successive refinements, will be a valuable tool to support the clinical development of cotadutide and related compounds.</p

Characterisation of cotadutide's dual GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonistic effects on glycaemic control using an in vivo human glucose regulation quantitative systems pharmacology model

Background and Purpose: Cotadutide is a dual GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonist with balanced agonistic activity at each receptor designed to harness the advantages on promoting liver health, weight loss and glycaemic control. We characterised the effects of cotadutide on glucose, insulin, GLP-1, GIP, and glucagon over time in a quantitative manner using our glucose dynamics systems model (4GI systems model), in combination with clinical data from a multiple ascending dose/Phase 2a (MAD/Ph2a) study in overweight and obese subjects with a history of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (NCT02548585). Experimental Approach: The cotadutide PK-4GI systems model was calibrated to clinical data by re-estimating only food related parameters. In vivo cotadutide efficacy was scaled based on in vitro potency. The model was used to explore the effect of weight loss on insulin sensitivity and predict the relative contribution of the GLP-1 and glucagon receptor agonistic effects on glucose. Key Results: Cotadutide MAD/Ph2a clinical endpoints were successfully predicted. The 4GI model captured a positive effect of weight loss on insulin sensitivity and showed that the stimulating effect of glucagon on glucose production counteracts the GLP-1 receptor-mediated decrease in glucose, resulting in a plateau for glucose decrease around a 200-μg cotadutide dose. Conclusion and Implications: The 4GI quantitative systems pharmacology model was able to predict the clinical effects of cotadutide on glucose, insulin, GLP-1, glucagon and GIP given known in vitro potency. The analyses demonstrated that the quantitative systems pharmacology model, and its successive refinements, will be a valuable tool to support the clinical development of cotadutide and related compounds.</p

A novel integrated QSP model of in vivo human glucose regulation to support the development of a glucagon/GLP-1 dual agonist

Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonists (GLP‐1RAs) and dual GLP‐1/glucagon receptor agonists improve glycaemic control and cause significant weight loss in patients with type 2 diabetes.(1) These effects are driven in part by augmenting glucose‐stimulated insulin release (incretin effect), reducing caloric intake and delayed gastric emptying. We developed and externally validated a novel integrated quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) model to gain quantitative insight into the relative contributions and mechanisms of drugs modulating glucose regulatory pathways. This model (4GI model) incorporates known feedback mechanisms among glucose, GLP‐1, glucagon, glucose‐dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP), and insulin after glucose provocation (i.e., food intake) and drug intervention utilizing published nonpharmacological and pharmacological (liraglutide, a GLP‐1RA) data. The resulting model accurately describes the aforementioned mechanisms and independently predicts the effects of the GLP‐1RAs (dulaglutide and semaglutide) on system dynamics. Therefore, the validated 4GI model represents a quantitative decision‐making tool to support the advancement of novel therapeutics and combination strategies modulating these pathways

Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis

Background/objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous (SC) and intravenous (IV) tanezumab administration in osteoarthritis (OA) patients. Materials and methods: Study 1027 (NCT01089725), a placebo-controlled trial, evaluated the efficacy of SC tanezumab (ie, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg) and the therapeutic equivalence of 10 mg tanezumab given subcutaneously versus intravenously every 8 weeks in the symptomatic treatment of OA. Coprimary endpoints were: change from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) Pain and Physical Function indices, and Patient\u27s Global Assessment (PGA) of OA. Study 1043 (NCT00994890) was a long-term, noncontrolled safety study of tanezumab (ie, 2.5, 5, and 10 mg) subcutaneously administered every 8 weeks. Both studies were discontinued prematurely due to a US Food and Drug Administration partial clinical hold. Results: Due to the clinical hold, Study 1027 was underpowered, and no statistical analyses were performed. Mean (standard error [SE]) change from baseline to week 8 in WOMAC Pain in tanezumab groups ranged from -3.59 (0.26) to -3.89 (0.32), versus -2.74 (0.25) with placebo. Mean (SE) change from baseline to week 8 in WOMAC Physical Function ranged from -3.13 (0.25) to -3.51 (0.28) with tanezumab and was -2.26 (0.24) with placebo. PGA mean (SE) change from baseline to week 8 ranged from -0.90 (0.11) to -1.08 (0.12) with tanezumab and was -0.78 (0.10) with placebo. Similar effectiveness was associated with tanezumab in Study 1043. Few patients in either study (1.4%-5.2%) discontinued due to adverse events. Five patients required total joint replacements in Study 1027 (placebo, n=2 [2.8%]; tanezumab 2.5 mg, n=3 [4.1%]) and 34 patients in Study 1043 (tanezumab 2.5 mg, n=11 [4.8%]; tanezumab 5 mg, n=8 [3.6%]; tanezumab 10 mg, n=15 [6.6%]). Conclusion: Preliminary results show similar efficacy and safety for both SC and IV administration of tanezumab based on the direct comparisons reported here and indirect comparisons with published results, confirming pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling predictions

Sequential Protein and Peptide Immunoaffinity Capture for Mass Spectrometry-Based Quantification of Total Human β‑Nerve Growth Factor

Nerve growth factor (NGF) is a neurotrophin that is implicated in the modulation of pain perception. Tanezumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) specific for NGF, is highly potent in sequestering NGF and has demonstrated efficacy for treatment of chronic pain in clinical trials. We describe a novel, sensitive immunoaffinity liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) assay for quantitative determination of human serum NGF levels at baseline and after tanezumab treatment. The assay combines magnetic bead-based NGF immunoaffinity enrichment using a non-neutralizing polyclonal antibody followed by digestion and quantitation of a NGF-derived tryptic peptide via high-flow peptide immunoaffinity enrichment and nanoflow LC–MS/MS. Following validation, the assay was employed to measure total NGF concentrations in samples from clinical studies. The assay had a <10% interassay relative error and <15% interassay coefficient of variation across a range from 7.03 to 450 pg/mL human NGF. Generally, human basal serum NGF concentrations were between 20 and 30 pg/mL which, upon treatment with tanezumab, elevated in a dose-dependent manner into the high pg/mL to low ng/mL range. This is the first report of clinical trial implementation of a MS-based assay that uses sequential protein and peptide immunoaffinity capture for protein target quantitation. The use of robotic sample preparation and a robust chromatography configuration enabled this technology to advance into the routine clinical analysis and now provides a bioanalytical platform for the development of similar assays for other protein targets

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Tixagevimab/Cilgavimab (AZD7442) Administered Intravenously Versus Intramuscularly in Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

AZD7442 (Evusheld) is a combination of two human anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), tixagevimab (AZD8895) and cilgavimab (AZD1061). Route of administration is an important consideration to improve treatment access. We assessed pharmacokinetics (PKs) of AZD7442 absorption following 600 mg administered intramuscularly (i.m.) in the thigh compared with 300 mg intravenously (i.v.) in ambulatory adults with symptomatic COVID-19. PK analysis included 84 of 110 participants randomized to receive i.m. AZD7442 and 16 of 61 randomized to receive i.v. AZD7442. Serum was collected prior to AZD7442 administration and at 24 hours and 3, 7, and 14 days later. PK parameters were calculated using noncompartmental methods. Following 600 mg i.m., the geometric mean maximum concentration (Cmax ) was 38.19 μg/mL (range: 17.30-60.80) and 37.33 μg/mL (range: 14.90-58.90) for tixagevimab and cilgavimab, respectively. Median observed time to maximum concentration (Tmax ) was 7.1 and 7.0 days for tixagevimab and cilgavimab, respectively. Serum concentrations after i.m. dosing were similar to the i.v. dose (27-29 μg/mL each component) at 3 days. The area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)0-7d geometric mean ratio was 0.9 for i.m. vs. i.v. Participants with higher weight or body mass index were more likely to have lower concentrations with either route. Women appeared to have higher interparticipant variability in concentrations compared with men. The concentrations of tixagevimab and cilgavimab after administration i.m. to the thigh were similar to those achieved with i.v. after 3 days from dosing. Exposure in the i.m. group was 90% of i.v. over 7 days. Administration to the thigh can be considered to provide consistent mAb exposure and improve access