49 research outputs found

    Relational grounding facilitates development of scientifically useful multiscale models

    Get PDF
    We review grounding issues that influence the scientific usefulness of any biomedical multiscale model (MSM). Groundings are the collection of units, dimensions, and/or objects to which a variable or model constituent refers. To date, models that primarily use continuous mathematics rely heavily on absolute grounding, whereas those that primarily use discrete software paradigms (e.g., object-oriented, agent-based, actor) typically employ relational grounding. We review grounding issues and identify strategies to address them. We maintain that grounding issues should be addressed at the start of any MSM project and should be reevaluated throughout the model development process. We make the following points. Grounding decisions influence model flexibility, adaptability, and thus reusability. Grounding choices should be influenced by measures, uncertainty, system information, and the nature of available validation data. Absolute grounding complicates the process of combining models to form larger models unless all are grounded absolutely. Relational grounding facilitates referent knowledge embodiment within computational mechanisms but requires separate model-to-referent mappings. Absolute grounding can simplify integration by forcing common units and, hence, a common integration target, but context change may require model reengineering. Relational grounding enables synthesis of large, composite (multi-module) models that can be robust to context changes. Because biological components have varying degrees of autonomy, corresponding components in MSMs need to do the same. Relational grounding facilitates achieving such autonomy. Biomimetic analogues designed to facilitate translational research and development must have long lifecycles. Exploring mechanisms of normal-to-disease transition requires model components that are grounded relationally. Multi-paradigm modeling requires both hyperspatial and relational grounding

    Ischemia reperfusion dysfunction changes model-estimated kinetics of myofilament interaction due to inotropic drugs in isolated hearts

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: The phase-space relationship between simultaneously measured myoplasmic [Ca(2+)] and isovolumetric left ventricular pressure (LVP) in guinea pig intact hearts is altered by ischemic and inotropic interventions. Our objective was to mathematically model this phase-space relationship between [Ca(2+)] and LVP with a focus on the changes in cross-bridge kinetics and myofilament Ca(2+ )sensitivity responsible for alterations in Ca(2+)-contraction coupling due to inotropic drugs in the presence and absence of ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury. METHODS: We used a four state computational model to predict LVP using experimentally measured, averaged myoplasmic [Ca(2+)] transients from unpaced, isolated guinea pig hearts as the model input. Values of model parameters were estimated by minimizing the error between experimentally measured LVP and model-predicted LVP. RESULTS: We found that IR injury resulted in reduced myofilament Ca(2+ )sensitivity, and decreased cross-bridge association and dissociation rates. Dopamine (8 ÎźM) reduced myofilament Ca(2+ )sensitivity before, but enhanced it after ischemia while improving cross-bridge kinetics before and after IR injury. Dobutamine (4 ÎźM) reduced myofilament Ca(2+ )sensitivity while improving cross-bridge kinetics before and after ischemia. Digoxin (1 ÎźM) increased myofilament Ca(2+ )sensitivity and cross-bridge kinetics after but not before ischemia. Levosimendan (1 ÎźM) enhanced myofilament Ca(2+ )affinity and cross-bridge kinetics only after ischemia. CONCLUSION: Estimated model parameters reveal mechanistic changes in Ca(2+)-contraction coupling due to IR injury, specifically the inefficient utilization of Ca(2+ )for contractile function with diastolic contracture (increase in resting diastolic LVP). The model parameters also reveal drug-induced improvements in Ca(2+)-contraction coupling before and after IR injury

    Software engineering considerations for individual-based models

    Full text link
    this paper is to identify important software engineering issues for IBMs and provide general recommendations for addressing these issues. Our intent is to provide guidelines that will help an IBM project develop software that (1) does not contain important undetected errors, (2) helps keep the project e#cient and cost-e#ective, and (3) provides the tools necessary to conduct valid science or responsible management with the model. Early detection of mistakes is crucial to the cost-e#ectiveness of any software project. Failure to detect mistakes leads to spending much of the project's time and budget on work that must be discarded after mistakes are found or (worse yet) the promulgation of "research" results or management decisions based on erroneous simulations. Likewise, failure to provide key software features can make it di#cult or impossible to understand and learn from an IBM. These guidelines are based mainly on the authors' extensive experience implementing IBMs and designing software libraries for individual-based simulatio

    ISL and ISHC parameters descriptions and values for validating experiments.

    No full text
    <p>ISL and ISHC parameters descriptions and values for validating experiments.</p
    corecore