31 research outputs found

    ULTrasound-guided TRAnsfemoral puncture in COmplex Large bORe PCI: study protocol of the UltraCOLOR trial

    Get PDF
    Introduction Although recently published evidence favours transradial access (TRA) when using large-bore guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex coronary lesions, the femoral artery will still be used in a considerate proportion of patients undergoing complex PCI, especially in PCI of chronic total occlusions (CTO). Ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery may reduce clinically relevant access site complications, but robust evidence is lacking up to date. Methods and analysis A total of 542 patients undergoing complex PCI, defined as PCI of CTO, complex bifurcation, heavy calcified lesion or left main, in which the 7-F or 8-F transfemoral access is required, will be randomised to ultrasound-guided puncture or fluoroscopy-guided puncture. The primary outcome is the incidence of the composite end-point of clinically relevant access site related bleeding and/or vascular complications requiring intervention. Access site complications and major adverse cardiovascular events up to 1 month will also be compared between both groups. Ethics and dissemination Ethical approval for the study was granted by the local Ethics Committee ('Medisch Ethische Toetsing Commissie Isala Zwolle') for all Dutch sites, 'Comité Medische Ethiek Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg' for Hospital Oost-Limburg, 'Comité d'éthique CHU-Charleroi - ISPPC' for Centre Hospilatier Universitaire de Charleroi and 'Ethik Kommission de Arztekammer Nordrhein' for Elisabeth-Krankenhaus). The trial outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed journals of the concerned literature. The ultrasound guided transfemoral access in complex large bore PCI trial has been administered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database, reference number: NCT03846752. Registration details ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03846752

    Pre-hospitale Beta-blockers in ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction = Pre-hospitale beta-blocker toediening in acuut myocard infarct.

    Get PDF
    The extent of myocardial infarction is an important determinant of mortality. Beta-blockers are a type of medication often prescribed after myocardial infarction. These drugs slow down the heart rate. However, little is known about the effect of beta-blockers on the extent of myocardial infarction, if administrated in an ambulance, i.e. prior to percutaneous angioplasty. This dissertation shows that early administration of beta-blockers does not reduce the extent of infarction, nor mortality. It does prevent arrhythmia during the acute phase after myocardial infarction and has only few side effects. Patients who have already been receiving long-term beta-blocker therapy are not at increased risk of cardiogenic shock when suffering myocardial infarction

    Beta-blocker effect on ST-segment: a prespecified analysis of the EARLY-BAMI randomised trial

    No full text
    Objective: The effect of early intravenous (IV) beta-blockers (BBs) administration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) on ST-segment deviation is unknown. We undertook a prespecified secondary analysis of the Early Beta-blocker Administration before primary PCI in patients with ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction (EARLY-BAMI) trial to investigate the effect of early IV BB on ST-segment deviation. Methods: The EARLY-BAMI trial randomised patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) to IV metoprolol (2×5 mg bolus) or matched placebo before pPCI. The prespecified outcome, evaluated by an independent core laboratory blinded to study treatment, was the residual ST-segment deviation 1 hour after pPCI (ie, the percentage of patients with >3 mm cumulative ST deviation at 1 hour after pPCI). Results: An ECG for the evaluation of residual ST-segment deviation 1 hour after pPCI was available in 442 out of 683 randomised patients. The BB group had a lower heart rate after pPCI compared with placebo (71.2±13.2 vs 74.3±13.6, p=0.016); however, no differences were noted in the percentages of patients with >3 mm cumulative ST deviation at 1 hour after pPCI (58.6% vs 54.1%, p=0.38, in BB vs placebo, respectively) neither a significant difference was found for the percentages of patients in each of the four prespecified groups (normalised ST-segment; 1-3 mm; 4-6 mm;>6 mm residual ST-deviation). Conclusions: In patients with STEMI, who were being transported for primary PCI, early IV BB administration did not significantly affect ST-segment deviation after pPCI compared with placebo. The neutral result of early IV BB administration on an early marker of pharmacological effect is consistent with the absence of subsequent improvement of clinical outcomes.Dutch Heart Foundation (Utrecht, the Netherlands, no. 2010B125) and an unrestricted grant by Medtronic Inc. (Heerlen, the Netherlands).No data JCR 20201.050 SJR (2020) Q1, 82/349 Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineNo data IDR 2020UE
    corecore