125 research outputs found
Extraction of the coupling constant from NN scattering data
We reexamine Chew's method for extracting the coupling constant from
np differential cross section measurements. Values for this coupling are
extracted below 350 MeV, in the potential model region, and up to 1 GeV. The
analyses to 1~GeV have utilized 55 data sets. We compare these results to those
obtained via mapping techniques. We find that these two methods give
consistent results which are in agreement with previous Nijmegen
determinations.Comment: 12 pages of text plus 2 figures. Revtex file and postscript figures
available via anonymous FTP at ftp://clsaid.phys.vt.edu/pub/n
Mapping differential interactomes by affinity purification coupled with data independent mass spectrometry acquisition
Characterizing changes in protein-protein interactions associated with sequence variants (e.g. disease-associated mutations or splice forms) or following exposure to drugs, growth factors or hormones is critical to understanding how protein complexes are built, localized and regulated. Affinity purification (AP) coupled with mass spectrometry permits the analysis of protein interactions under near-physiological conditions, yet monitoring interaction changes requires the development of a robust and sensitive quantitative approach, especially for large-scale studies where cost and time are major considerations. To this end, we have coupled AP to data-independent mass spectrometric acquisition (SWATH), and implemented an automated data extraction and statistical analysis pipeline to score modulated interactions. Here, we use AP-SWATH to characterize changes in protein-protein interactions imparted by the HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922 or melanoma-associated mutations in the human kinase CDK4. We show that AP-SWATH is a robust label-free approach to characterize such changes, and propose a scalable pipeline for systems biology studies
Assessing the Potential of Untargeted SWATH Mass Spectrometry-Based Metabolomics to Differentiate Closely Related Exposures in Observational Studies
Mass spectrometry (MS) is increasingly used in clinical studies to obtain molecular evidence of chemical exposures, such as tobacco smoke, alcohol, and drugs. This evidence can help verify clinical data retrieved through anamnesis or questionnaires and may provide insights into unreported exposures, for example those classified as the same despite small but possibly relevant chemical differences or due to contaminants in reported exposure compounds. Here, we aimed to explore the potential of untargeted SWATH metabolomics to differentiate such closely related exposures. This data-independent acquisition MS-based profiling technique was applied to urine samples of 316 liver and 570 kidney transplant recipients from the TransplantLines Biobank and Cohort Study (NCT03272841), where we focused on the immunosuppressive drug mycophenolate, which is either supplied as a morpholino-ester prodrug or as an enteric-coated product, the illicit drug cocaine, which is usually supplied as an adulterated product, and the proton pump inhibitors omeprazole and esomeprazole. Based on these examples, we found that untargeted SWATH metabolomics has considerable potential to identify different (unreported) exposure or co-exposure metabolites and may determine variations in their abundances. We also found that these signals alone may sometimes be unable to distinguish closely related exposures, and enhancement of differentiation, for example by integration with pharmacogenomics data, is needed
Distal Radius Interventions for Fracture Treatment (DRIFT) trial: study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial of completely translated distal radius fractures at paediatric hospitals in North America
Introduction: Distal radius fractures are the most common fractures seen in the emergency department in children in the USA. However, no established or standardised guidelines exist for the optimal management of completely displaced fractures in younger children. The proposed multicentre randomised trial will compare functional outcomes between children treated with fracture reduction under sedation versus children treated with simple immobilisation. Methods and analysis: Participants aged 4–10 years presenting to the emergency department with 100% dorsally translated metaphyseal fractures of the radius less than 5 cm from the distal radial physis will be recruited for the study. Those patients with open fractures, other ipsilateral arm fractures (excluding ulna), pathologic fractures, bone diseases, or neuromuscular or metabolic conditions will be excluded. Participants who agree to enrol in the trial will be randomly assigned via a minimal sufficient balance algorithm to either sedated reduction or in situ immobilisation. A sample size of 167 participants per arm will provide at least 90% power to detect a difference in the primary outcome of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity computer adaptive test scores of 4 points at 1 year from treatment. Primary analyses will employ a linear mixed model to estimate the treatment effect at 1 year. Secondary outcomes include additional measures of perceived pain, complications, radiographic angulation, satisfaction and additional procedures (revisions, refractures, reductions and reoperations). Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the following local Institutional Review Boards: Advarra, serving as the single Institutional Review Board, approved the study (Pro00062090) in April 2022. The Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, ON, Canada) did not rely on Advarra and received separate approval from their local Research Ethics Board (REB; REB number: 1000079992) on 19 July 2023. Results will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at international conference meetings. Trial registration number: NCT05131685
Recommended from our members
Health System, Community-Based, or Usual Dementia Care for Persons With Dementia and Caregivers
ImportanceThe effectiveness of different approaches to dementia care is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine the effectiveness of health system-based, community-based dementia care, and usual care for persons with dementia and for caregiver outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsRandomized clinical trial of community-dwelling persons living with dementia and their caregivers conducted at 4 sites in the US (enrollment June 2019-January 2023; final follow-up, August 2023).InterventionsParticipants were randomized 7:7:1 to health system-based care provided by an advanced practice dementia care specialist (n = 1016); community-based care provided by a social worker, nurse, or licensed therapist care consultant (n = 1016); or usual care (n = 144).Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes were caregiver-reported Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) severity score for persons living with dementia (range, 0-36; higher scores, greater behavioral symptoms severity; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 2.8-3.2) and Modified Caregiver Strain Index for caregivers (range, 0-26; higher scores, greater strain; MCID, 1.5-2.3). Three secondary outcomes included caregiver self-efficacy (range, 4-20; higher scores, more self-efficacy).ResultsAmong 2176 dyads (individuals with dementia, mean age, 80.6 years; 58.4%, female; and 20.6%, Black or Hispanic; caregivers, mean age, 65.2 years; 75.8%, female; and 20.8% Black or Hispanic), primary outcomes were assessed for more than 99% of participants, and 1343 participants (62% of those enrolled and 91% still alive and had not withdrawn) completed the study through 18 months. No significant differences existed between the 2 treatments or between treatments vs usual care for the primary outcomes. Overall, the least squares means (LSMs) for NPI-Q scores were 9.8 for health system, 9.5 for community-based, and 10.1 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was 0.30 (97.5% CI, -0.18 to 0.78); health system vs usual care, -0.33 (97.5% CI, -1.32 to 0.67); and community-based vs usual care, -0.62 (97.5% CI, -1.61 to 0.37). The LSMs for the Modified Caregiver Strain Index were 10.7 for health system, 10.5 for community-based, and 10.6 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was 0.25 (97.5% CI, -0.16 to 0.66); health system vs usual care, 0.14 (97.5% CI, -0.70 to 0.99); and community-based vs usual care, -0.10 (97.5% CI, -0.94 to 0.74). Only the secondary outcome of caregiver self-efficacy was significantly higher for both treatments vs usual care but not between treatments: LSMs were 15.1 for health system, 15.2 for community-based, and 14.4 for usual care. The difference between health system vs community-based care was -0.16 (95% CI, -0.37 to 0.06); health system vs usual care, 0.70 (95% CI, 0.26-1.14); and community-based vs usual care, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.29).Conclusions and relevanceIn this randomized trial of dementia care programs, no significant differences existed between health system-based and community-based care interventions nor between either active intervention or usual care regarding patient behavioral symptoms and caregiver strain.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03786471
SWATH acquisition mode for drug metabolism and metabolomics investigations
Aim: Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment-ion spectra (SWATH) has recently emerged as a powerful high resolution mass spectrometric data independent acquisition technique. In the present work, the potential and challenges of an integrated strategy based on LC-SWATH/MS for simultaneous drug metabolism and metabolomics studies was investigated. Methodology: The richness of SWATH data allows numerous data analysis approaches, including: detection of metabolites by prediction; metabolite detection by mass defect filtering; quantification from high-resolution MS precursor chromatograms or fragment chromatograms. Multivariate analysis can be applied to the data from the full scan or SWATH windows and allows changes in endogenous metabolites as well as xenobiotic metabolites, to be detected. Principal component variable grouping detects intersample variable correlation and groups variables with similar profiles which simplifies interpretation and highlights related ions and fragments. Principal component variable grouping can extract product ion spectra from the data collected by fragmenting a wide precursor ion window. Conclusion: It was possible to characterize 28 vinpocetine metabolites in urine, mostly mono- and di-hydroxylated forms, and detect endogenous metabolite expression changes in urine after the administration of a single dose of a model drug (vinpocetine) to rats. </jats:p
SWATH data independent acquisition mass spectrometry for metabolomics
Systems Biology and ‘Omics’ require reproducible identification and quantitation of many compounds, preferably in large sample cohorts. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry is important since data generated can be used for structure elucidation and highly specific targeted quantitation. Despite great success, the technique has limitations such as: compound coverage in one analysis, method development time and single sample analysis time which determines throughput. New instrument capabilities have led to improved methods, including ‘Data Independent Acquisition’ so-called because acquisition is not changed by acquired data. SWATH-MS is a specific example that has quickly become prominent in proteomics because of increased peptide coverage, high quantitation accuracy, excellent reproducibility and the generation of a ‘digital map’. These capabilities are important in small molecules analyses although uptake in these applications has been slower. We describe the SWATH-MS technique, review its use in applications such as metabolomics and forensics, and summarize on-going improvements and future prospects
SWATH-MS for metabolomics and lipidomics: critical aspects of qualitative and quantitative analysis
SWATH-MS for metabolomics and lipidomics: critical aspects of qualitative and quantitative analysis
- …
