2,942 research outputs found

    Pseudoscalar pole light-by-light contributions to the muon (g−2)(g-2) in Resonance Chiral Theory

    Get PDF
    We have studied the P→γ⋆γ⋆P\to\gamma^\star\gamma^\star transition form-factors (P=π0,η,η′P=\pi^0,\eta,\eta') within a chiral invariant framework that allows us to relate the three form-factors and evaluate the corresponding contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment aμa_\mu, through pseudoscalar pole contributions. We use a chiral invariant Lagrangian to describe the interactions between the pseudo-Goldstones from the spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking and the massive meson resonances. We will consider just the lightest vector and pseudoscalar resonance multiplets. Photon interactions and flavor breaking effects are accounted for in this covariant framework. This article studies the most general corrections of order mP2m_P^2 within this setting. Requiring short-distance constraints fixes most of the parameters entering the form-factors, consistent with previous determinations. The remaining ones are obtained from a fit of these form-factors to experimental measurements in the space-like (q2≤0q^2\le0) region of photon momenta. The combination of data, chiral symmetry relations between form-factors and high-energy constraints allows us to determine with improved precision the on-shell PP-pole contribution to the Hadronic Light-by-Light scattering of the muon anomalous magnetic moment: we obtain aμP,HLbL=(8.47±0.16)⋅10−10a_{\mu}^{P,HLbL}=(8.47\pm 0.16)\cdot10^{-10} for our best fit. This result was obtained excluding BaBar π0\pi^0 data, which our analysis finds in conflict with the remaining experimental inputs. This study also allows us to determine the parameters describing the η−η′\eta-\eta' system in the two-mixing angle scheme and their correlations. Finally, a preliminary rough estimate of the impact of loop corrections (1/NC1/N_C) and higher vector multiplets (asym) enlarges the uncertainty up to aμP,HLbL=(8.47±0.16sta±0.091/NC−0.0+0.5asym)⋅10−10a_\mu^{P,HLbL} = (8.47\pm 0.16_{\rm sta}\pm0.09_{1/N_C}{}^{+0.5}_{-0.0}{}_{\rm asym})\cdot 10^{-10}.Comment: 43 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in JHEP. New subsection involving error analysis and some minor change

    Moduli Spaces and Formal Operads

    Full text link
    Let overline{M}_{g,n} be the moduli space of stable algebraic curves of genus g with n marked points. With the operations which relate the different moduli spaces identifying marked points, the family (overline{M}_{g,n})_{g,n} is a modular operad of projective smooth Deligne-Mumford stacks, overline{M}. In this paper we prove that the modular operad of singular chains C_*(overline{M};Q) is formal; so it is weakly equivalent to the modular operad of its homology H_*(overline{M};Q). As a consequence, the "up to homotopy" algebras of these two operads are the same. To obtain this result we prove a formality theorem for operads analogous to Deligne-Griffiths-Morgan-Sullivan formality theorem, the existence of minimal models of modular operads, and a characterization of formality for operads which shows that formality is independent of the ground field.Comment: 36 pages (v3: some typographical corrections
    • …
    corecore