High fludarabine exposure and relationship with treatment-related mortality after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Despite its common use in nonmyeloablative preparative regimens, the pharmacokinetics of fludarabine are poorly characterized in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients and exposure-response relationships remain undefined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between plasma F-ara-A exposure, the systemically circulating moiety of fludarabine, and engraftment, acute GVHD, TRM and OS after HCT. The preparative regimen consisted of CY 50 mg/kg/day i.v. day -6; plus fludarabine 30-40 mg/m²/day i.v. on days -6 to -2 and TBI 200 cGy on day -1. F-ara-A pharmacokinetics were carried out with the first dose of fludarabine in 87 adult patients. Median (range) F-ara-A area-under-the-curve (AUC((0-∞))) was 5.0 μg h/mL (2.0-11.0), clearance 15.3 L/h (6.2-36.6), C(min) 55 ng/mL (17-166) and concentration on day(zero) 16.0 ng/mL (0.1-144.1). Despite dose reductions, patients with renal insufficiency had higher F-ara-A exposures. There was strong association between high plasma concentrations of F-ara-A and increased risk of TRM and reduced OS. Patients with an AUC((0-∞)) greater than 6.5 μg h/mL had 4.56 greater risk of TRM and significantly lower OS. These data suggest that clinical strategies are needed to optimize dosing of fludarabine to prevent overexposure and toxicity in HCT

A prospective randomized trial of the anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and granisetron during bone marrow transplantation

AbstractTo determine the comparative anti-emetic efficacy of ondansetron and granisetron in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation, we performed a double-blind, randomized trial in pediatric and adult patients receiving transplants at the University of Minnesota. The results in 187 patients stratified by age (<18 years, n = 51; > or =18 years, n = 136) were analyzed. The average number of emetic episodes in the entire group from day -7 to 2 was 0.86/day for patients receiving ondansetron and 0.73/day for those receiving granisetron (p = 0.32). No differences were noted between the two drugs in total days of complete or major control of emesis or in the number of requests for additional drugs to alleviate symptoms of nausea. The use of total-body irradiation-containing conditioning regimens was associated with a decreased number of emetic episodes compared with regimens of chemotherapy alone. Perceived nausea was evaluated using a nausea scoring system, and no differences were apparent between the granisetron and ondansetron groups; however, reported nausea was significantly higher in females (p<0.01) and in the adult population (p = 0.05). We conclude that both ondansetron and granisetron provide good control of nausea and vomiting experienced with conditioning regimens for bone marrow transplantation. The relative cost of the drugs within an institution must be considered in developing standard anti-emetic regimens for bone marrow transplantation.Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1999;5(6):386-93

High fludarabine exposure and relationship with treatment-related mortality after nonmyeloablative hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Despite its common use in nonmyeloablative preparative regimens, the pharmacokinetics of fludarabine are poorly characterized in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients and exposure-response relationships remain undefined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between plasma F-ara-A exposure, the systemically circulating moiety of fludarabine, and engraftment, acute GVHD, TRM and OS after HCT. The preparative regimen consisted of CY 50 mg/kg/day i.v. day -6; plus fludarabine 30-40 mg/m²/day i.v. on days -6 to -2 and TBI 200 cGy on day -1. F-ara-A pharmacokinetics were carried out with the first dose of fludarabine in 87 adult patients. Median (range) F-ara-A area-under-the-curve (AUC((0-∞))) was 5.0 μg h/mL (2.0-11.0), clearance 15.3 L/h (6.2-36.6), C(min) 55 ng/mL (17-166) and concentration on day(zero) 16.0 ng/mL (0.1-144.1). Despite dose reductions, patients with renal insufficiency had higher F-ara-A exposures. There was strong association between high plasma concentrations of F-ara-A and increased risk of TRM and reduced OS. Patients with an AUC((0-∞)) greater than 6.5 μg h/mL had 4.56 greater risk of TRM and significantly lower OS. These data suggest that clinical strategies are needed to optimize dosing of fludarabine to prevent overexposure and toxicity in HCT

Personalized fludarabine dosing to reduce nonrelapse mortality in hematopoietic stem-cell transplant recipients receiving reduced intensity conditioning

Patients undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) commonly receive fludarabine. Higher exposure of F-ara-A, the active component of fludarabine, has been associated with a greater risk of nonrelapse mortality (NRM). We sought to develop a model for fludarabine dosing in adult HCT recipients that would allow for precise dose targeting and predict adverse clinical outcomes. We developed a pharmacokinetic model from 87 adults undergoing allogeneic RIC HCT that predicts F-ara-A population clearance (Clpop) accounting for ideal body weight and renal function. We then applied the developed model to an independent cohort of 240 patients to identify whether model predictions were associated with NRM and acute graft versus host disease (GVHD). Renal mechanisms accounted for 35.6% of total F-ara-A Clpop. In the independent cohort, the hazard ratio of NRM at day 100 was significantly higher in patients with predicted F-ara-A clearance (Clpred) &lt;8.50&nbsp;L/h (P&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.01) and area under the curve (AUCpred) &gt;6.00&nbsp;μg × h/mL (P&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.01). A lower Clpred was also associated with more NRM at month 6 (P&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.01) and trended toward significance at 12&nbsp;months (P&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.05). In multivariate analysis, low fludarabine clearance trended toward higher risk of acute GVHD (P&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.05). We developed a model that predicts an individual's systemic F-ara-A exposure accounting for kidney function and weight. This model may provide guidance in dosing especially in overweight individuals and those with altered kidney function