ER and HER2 expression are positively correlated in HER2 non-overexpressing breast cancer

PMCID: PMC3446380This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited

Characterization of the genomic features and expressed fusion genes in micropapillary carcinomas of the breast

Micropapillary carcinoma ( MPC ) is a rare histological special type of breast cancer, characterized by an aggressive clinical behaviour and a pattern of copy number aberrations ( CNAs ) distinct from that of grade‐ and oestrogen receptor ( ER )‐matched invasive carcinomas of no special type ( IC‐NSTs ). The aims of this study were to determine whether MPCs are underpinned by a recurrent fusion gene(s) or mutations in 273 genes recurrently mutated in breast cancer. Sixteen MPCs were subjected to microarray‐based comparative genomic hybridization ( aCGH ) analysis and Sequenom OncoCarta mutation analysis. Eight and five MPCs were subjected to targeted capture and RNA sequencing, respectively. aCGH analysis confirmed our previous observations about the repertoire of CNAs of MPCs . Sequencing analysis revealed a spectrum of mutations similar to those of luminal B IC‐NSTs , and recurrent mutations affecting mitogen‐activated protein kinase family genes and NBPF10 . RNA ‐sequencing analysis identified 17 high‐confidence fusion genes, eight of which were validated and two of which were in‐frame. No recurrent fusions were identified in an independent series of MPCs and IC‐NSTs . Forced expression of in‐frame fusion genes ( SLC2A1–FAF1 and BCAS4–AURKA ) resulted in increased viability of breast cancer cells. In addition, genomic disruption of CDK12 caused by out‐of‐frame rearrangements was found in one MPC and in 13% of HER2 ‐positive breast cancers, identified through a re‐analysis of publicly available massively parallel sequencing data. In vitro analyses revealed that CDK12 gene disruption results in sensitivity to PARP inhibition, and forced expression of wild‐type CDK12 in a CDK12 ‐null cell line model resulted in relative resistance to PARP inhibition. Our findings demonstrate that MPCs are neither defined by highly recurrent mutations in the 273 genes tested, nor underpinned by a recurrent fusion gene. Although seemingly private genetic events, some of the fusion transcripts found in MPCs may play a role in maintenance of a malignant phenotype and potentially offer therapeutic opportunities. © 2014 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106752/1/path4325.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/106752/2/path4325-sup-0001-AppendixS1.pd

Analgesic therapy in postherpetic neuralgia: a quantitative systematic review.

BackgroundPostherpetic neuralgia (PHN) is a complication of acute herpes zoster, which is emerging as a preferred clinical trial model for chronic neuropathic pain. Although there are published meta-analyses of analgesic therapy in PHN, and neuropathic pain in general, the evidence base has been substantially enhanced by the recent publication of several major trials. Therefore, we have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis for both efficacy and adverse events of analgesic therapy for PHN.Methods and findingsWe systematically searched databases (MEDLINE 1966-2004, EMBASE 1988-2004, CINAHL 1982-2002, and PubMed [29 October 2004]) for trials of PHN. We also searched references of retrieved studies and review articles for further trials. We included trials that examined adult patients with PHN of greater duration than 3 mo, that were blinded, randomised, and had at least one measure of pain outcome. Dichotomous pain outcome data were extracted for 50% decrease in baseline pain using a hierarchy of pain/pain-relief measurement tools. Where available, dichotomous data were also collected for adverse events. Calculated estimates of efficacy included relative benefit and number needed to treat. Of 62 studies identified, 35 were randomised controlled trials. Of these, 31 were placebo controlled and suitable for meta-analysis, from which it was possible to extract dichotomous efficacy outcome data from 25. This meta-analysis revealed that there is evidence to support the use of the following orally administered therapies: tricyclic antidepressants, "strong" opioids, gabapentin, tramadol, and pregabalin. Topical therapies associated with efficacy were lidocaine 5% patch and capsaicin. Finally, a single study of spinal intrathecal administration of lidocaine and methyl prednisolone demonstrated efficacy, although this has yet to be replicated. Data suggest that the following therapies are not associated with efficacy in PHN: certain NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., oral memantine, oral dextromethorphan, intravenous ketamine), codeine, ibuprofen, lorazepam, certain 5HT1 receptor agonists, and acyclovir. Topical administration of benzydamine, diclofenac/diethyl ether, and vincristine (iontophoresis) are similarly not associated with efficacy, nor are intrathecal administration of lidocaine alone or epidural administration of lidocaine and methylprednisolone, intravenous therapy with lidocaine, subcutaneous injection of Cronassial, or acupuncture. However, many of the trials that demonstrated a lack of efficacy represented comparatively low numbers of patient episodes or were single-dose studies, so it may be appropriate to regard such interventions as "not yet adequately tested" rather than demonstrating "no evidence of efficacy." Topical aspirin/diethyl ether has not been adequately tested.ConclusionThe evidence base supports the oral use of tricyclic antidepressants, certain opioids, and gabapentinoids in PHN. Topical therapy with lidocaine patches and capsaicin is similarly supported. Intrathecal administration of methylprednisolone appears to be associated with high efficacy, but its safety requires further evaluation

QUOROM Statement Flow Diagram

<p>QUOROM Statement Flow Diagram</p

Sentinel-Node Biopsy in Melanoma

To the Editor: The results of the trial by Morton et al. (Sept. 28 issue) 1 involving sentinel-node biopsy in patients with melanoma do not show a survival benefit with immediate lymphadenectomy for three reasons. First, there were false positive results in the sentinel node (tiny deposits of melanoma not destined to progress to a palpable nodal recurrence, which is a surrogate measure for survival). Since there was no significant difference in survival between the study groups from the time of randomization, only 119 patients in the biopsy group would be expected to have a palpable nodal recurrence; of these patients, . .