Subgroup Analysis in Pulmonary Hypertension-Specific Therapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) treatment decisions are driven by the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Subgroup analyses are often performed to assess whether the intervention effect will change due to the patient’s characteristics, thus allowing for individualized decisions. This review aimed to evaluate the appropriateness and interpretation of subgroup analyses performed in PH-specific therapy RCTs published between 2000 and 2020. Claims of subgroup effects were evaluated with prespecified criteria. Overall, 30 RCTs were included. Subgroup analyses presented: a high number of subgroup analyses reported, lack of prespecification, and lack of interaction tests. The trial protocol was not available for most RCTs; significant differences were found in those articles that published the protocol. Authors reported 13 claims of subgroup effect, with 12 claims meeting four or fewer of Sun’s criteria. Even when most RCTs were generally at low risk of bias and were published in high-impact journals, the credibility and general quality of subgroup analyses and subgroup claims were low due to methodological flaws. Clinicians should be skeptical of claims of subgroup effects and interpret subgroup analyses with caution, as due to their poor quality, these analyses may not serve as guidance for personalized care

Correction: Smartphone Apps for Patients With Hematologic Malignancies: Systematic Review and Evaluation of Content

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.2196/35851.]

Venetoclax combination therapy with hypomethylating agents in young adults with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukaemia

In recent years, one of the most successful advances in treating acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) has been the combination of the B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL-2) inhibitor venetoclax with hypomethylating agents (decitabine or azacytidine). This combination treatment has an accelerated approval by the Food and Drug Administration for newly diagnosed AML adults who are 75 years of age or older or who have comorbidities and are not eligible to receive intensive induction chemotherapy. AML is the most common form of acute leukaemia in adults, with a median age at diagnosis of 68 years. Consequently, most of the patients included in the studies are elderly. Traditionally, young patients achieve higher remission rates compared with the elderly AML population. Although venetoclax combination therapy could become a treatment option for treating young patients with relapsed/refractory AML, this regimen has not been systematically tested in this setting. In this study, we summarize the currently available evidence on the treatment of venetoclax in combination with hypomethylating agents for the treatment of young relapsed/refractory AML patients, in addition to our experience in clinical practice with two case reports. Venetoclax, combined with hypomethylating agents, seems to be an effective option for young relapsed/refractory AML patients. However, due to the poor quality of the evidence, additional well-designed studies with greater numbers of patients are needed to confirm the effectiveness and safety of venetoclax combination regimens for this population

Intervención multidisciplinar para la mejora de la seguridad de los fármacos hipoglucemiantes

Ye

Association between anticholinergic activity and xerostomia and/ or xerophthalmia in the elderly systematic review

Purpose The aim of this work was to investigate the association between anticholinergic burden or anticholinergic drug use and xerostomia and/or xerophtalmia in elderly through a systematic review of the published literature. Methods A search was carried out in 3 databases (CINAHL, Embase and Pubmed). Studies conducted in people ≥65 years of age, who took anticholinergic medications, and measured the association between the anticholinergic burden or the use of these medications with the prevalence of xerostomia and / or xerophthalmia, published up to August 2022, were selected. Studies published in languages other than Spanish and/or English were excluded. Results One thousand two hundred eleven articles were identified, 10 were selected for this review: six cross-sectional studies, two cohorts, one case-control and one randomized controlled clinical trial. A total of 3535 patients included in the different studies were studied. The most used scales were the Anticholinergic Drug Scale (ADS) and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale (ARS). Four articles studied the relationship between the use of anticholinergic medication and the prevalence of xerostomia and / or xerophthalmia, finding a positive relationship with xerostomia in all of them. Another 6 measured the relationship between anticholinergic burden and xerostomia and / or xerophthalmia. Four found a positive relationship between anticholinergic burden and xerostomia and/or xerophthalmia. Conclusions Our findings suggest a clear relationship between the use of anticholinergic drugs or anticholinergic burden and the presence of xerostomia. This relationship was less conclusive in the case of xerophthalmia

Association between anticholinergic burden and constipation: a systematic review

The association between anticholinergic burden and constipation is not well defined and documented; for this reason, a systematic review was carried out in five databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus), including studies assessing the correlation between anticholinergic burden, and constipation between January 2006 and December 2020. Data extraction was conducted independently by two researchers. Abstracts and titles were reviewed to determine eligibility for review with eligible articles read in full. From 2507 identified articles, 11 were selected for this review: six cross-sectional studies, four retrospective cohort studies, and a post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial. Overall, nine studies reported at least one statistical association between anticholinergic burden and constipation, finding 13 positive results out of 24 association measurements. A total of 211,921 patients were studied. The association between constipation and anticholinergic burden could be demonstrated in studies including 207,795 patients. Most studies were not designed to find differences in constipation prevalence and did not adjust the results by confounding factors. Our findings suggest that a correlation between anticholinergic burden and constipation exists. Higher quality-evidence studies are needed, including analysis that considers confounding factors, such as other non-pharmacological causes of constipation

Evolution of patients with home parenteral nutrition: a systematic review of available studies

[ES] Introducción: la nutrición parenteral domiciliaria (NPD) constituye el tratamiento de elección para pacientes con fallo intestinal que no requieren ingreso hospitalario. En esta revisión sistemática, nuestro objetivo fue realizar un análisis epidemiológico y de práctica clínica en NPD. Métodos: la revisión se realizó siguiendo la guía PRISMA. Para ello, se hizo una búsqueda bibliográfica en PubMed® y EMBASE® de los estudios publicados entre 2009 y 2019 en inglés o español que realizaran el seguimiento de pacientes con NPD durante al menos 5 años. Esta búsqueda se completó manualmente. Se excluyeron los artículos centrados únicamente en pacientes oncológicos, una patología específica o embarazadas o bien en complicaciones. Resultados: se identificaron 267 artículos, de los que cumplieron los criterios 9 (3 de población pediátrica y 6 de adultos). En adultos, la principal diferencia entre los estudios fue la patología de base. La indicación mayoritaria fue el síndrome de intestino corto y la causa de exitus, la enfermedad primaria. La mayor parte de la población pediátrica recibió este apoyo en los primeros meses de vida. Además, destaca el mayor porcentaje de conversión a vía oral y el menor número de fallecimientos frente a población adulta. Conclusiones: la utilización de la NPD en patología oncológica está sometida a una amplia variabilidad geográfica. Sería recomendable establecer directrices de uso en enfermos oncológicos y la realización de estudios de calidad que aporten información rigurosa y homogénea.[EN] Introduction: home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a fundamental treatment for patients with intestinal failure who do not require hospitalization. We aimed to conduct an epidemiological and clinical practice analysis of HPN through a systematic review. Methods: the systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. A search was performed using the Healthcare Databases Advanced Search of PubMed® and EMBASE®, to identify articles which followed patients treated with HPN for at least 5 years, published between 2009 and 2019 in English or Spanish language. In addition, we manually retrieved other publications of interest. We excluded articles about subgroups of patients with a specific pathology, cancer or pregnant patients. We excluded studies collecting exclusively HPN complications. Results: a total of 267 references were identified, of which 9 met criteria (3 of pediatric population and 6 of adults). In adults, the main difference found between publications was the underlying pathologies. The most common indication was short bowel syndrome and the main cause of exitus was the underlying pathology. Most of the pediatric patients received this support in the first months of life. In addition, children showed a higher conversion rate to oral intake and a lower number of deaths when compared to adults. Conclusions: the use of HPN in cancer pathology is subject to wide geographic variability. It would be advisable to establish indication guidelines in patients with cancer and conduct quality studies, which provide rigorous and homogeneous information

Nuestra experiencia de ocho años en nutrición parenteral domiciliaria de pacientes adultos.

Background: home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is a technique that allows increasing the survival of patients with intestinal failure. Aim: to study the evolution of home parenteral nutrition over the last 8 years in our center. Methods: a retrospective study of adult patients receiving HPN between 2011 and 2019. Study variables are expressed as frequency and mean ± SD (range). Parametric, non-parametric tests, and a survival analysis (

Contemporary use of cefazolin for MSSA infective endocarditis: analysis of a national prospective cohort

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the real use of cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infective endocarditis (IE) in the Spanish National Endocarditis Database (GAMES) and to compare it with antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP). Methods: Prospective cohort study with retrospective analysis of a cohort of MSSA IE treated with cloxacillin and/or cefazolin. Outcomes assessed were relapse; intra-hospital, overall, and endocarditis-related mortality; and adverse events. Risk of renal toxicity with each treatment was evaluated separately. Results: We included 631 IE episodes caused by MSSA treated with cloxacillin and/or cefazolin. Antibiotic treatment was cloxacillin, cefazolin, or both in 537 (85%), 57 (9%), and 37 (6%) episodes, respectively. Patients treated with cefazolin had significantly higher rates of comorbidities (median Charlson Index 7, P <0.01) and previous renal failure (57.9%, P <0.01). Patients treated with cloxacillin presented higher rates of septic shock (25%, P = 0.033) and new-onset or worsening renal failure (47.3%, P = 0.024) with significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (38.5%, P = 0.017). One-year IE-related mortality and rate of relapses were similar between treatment groups. None of the treatments were identified as risk or protective factors. Conclusion: Our results suggest that cefazolin is a valuable option for the treatment of MSSA IE, without differences in 1-year mortality or relapses compared with cloxacillin, and might be considered equally effective