Editorial introduction: decision making, reasoning, context and perspective

This edition includes articles based on presentations to an international conference in March 2019 at the University of West London (UWL) in the United Kingdom, on the subject of “Shared Decision-Making, Person-Centred Care & The Values Agenda”—a conference organized by UWL's European Institute for Person Centred Health and Social Care, in collaboration with the European Society for Person Centred Healthcare and the Collaborating Centre for Valuesbased Practice at St. Catherine's College, Oxford, U

Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care

Rationale, aims, and objectives People worldwide are affected by psychiatric disorders that lack a "best" treatment option. The role of shared decision-making (SDM) in psychiatric care seems evident, yet remains limited. Research on SDM in specialized mental health is scarce, concentrating on patients with depressive disorder or psychiatric disorders in general and less on patients with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Furthermore, recent research concentrates on the evaluation of interventions to promote and measure SDM rather than on the feasibility of SDM in routine practice. This study investigated patients' and clinicians' perspectives on SDM to treat depression, anxiety disorders, and OCD as to better understand SDM in specialized psychiatric care and its challenges in clinical practice. Methods Transcripts of eight focus groups with 17 outpatients and 33 clinicians were coded, and SDM-related codes were analysed using thematic analyses. Results Motivators, responsibilities, and preconditions regarding SDM were defined. Patients thought SDM should be common practice given the autonomy they have over their own bodies and felt responsible for their treatments. Clinicians value SDM for obtaining patients' consent, promoting treatment adherence, and establishing a good patient-clinician relationship. Patients and clinicians thought clinicians assumed the most responsibility regarding the initiation and achievement of SDM in clinical practice. According to clinicians, preconditions were often not met, were influenced by illness severity, and formed important barriers (eg, patient's decision-making capacity, treatment availability, and clinicians' preferences), leading to paternalistic decision-making. Patients recognized these difficulties, but felt none of these preclude the implementation of SDM. Personalized information and more consultation time could facilitate SDM. Conclusions Patients and clinicians in specialized psychiatric care value SDM, but adapting it to daily practice remains challenging. Clinicians are vital to the implementation of SDM and should become versed in how to involve patients in the decision-making process, even when this is difficult.Analysis and support of clinical decision makin

Clinical and sociodemographic associations with treatment selection in major depression

Stress-related psychiatric disorders across the life spa

Le foot au féminin

Une initiative innovante : la création, au lycée Louis Pergaud de Besançon, d'une section sportive académique de football féminin, structure d'accueuil pour l'élite régionale. Organisation de la section sports-études, programme de l'année, présentation de quelques situations pédagogiques