Variant of hepatitis B virus with primary resistance to adefovir

The reverse-transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine (Zeffix, GlaxoSmithKline) is often used to treat chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) until resistance develops. Treatment may then be switched to the reverse-transcriptase inhibitor adefovir (Hepsera, Gilead), which has a lower frequency of resistance. Here, we describe three cases of primary adefovir resistance that were sensitive to tenofovir (Viread, Gilead). All three cases involved a rare HBV variant with a valine at position 233 of the reverse-transcriptase domain instead of isoleucine (rtI233V), as in the wild-type virus. This HBV variant also displayed resistance to adefovir and sensitivity to tenofovir in vitro

Efficacy and safety of raltegravir for treatment of HIV for 5 years in the BENCHMRK studies: Final results of two randomised, placebo-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Two randomised, placebo-controlled trials-BENCHMRK-1 and BENCHMRK-2-investigated the efficacy and safety of raltegravir, an HIV-1 integrase strand-transfer inhibitor. We report final results of BENCHMRK-1 and BENCHMRK-2 combined at 3 years (the end of the double-blind phase) and 5 years (the end of the study). METHODS: Integrase-inhibitor-naive patients with HIV resistant to three classes of drug and who were failing antiretroviral therapy were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to raltegravir 400 mg twice daily or placebo, both with optimised background treatment. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation until week 156, after which all patients were offered open-label raltegravir until week 240. The primary endpoint was previously assessed at 16 weeks. We assessed long-term efficacy with endpoints of the proportion of patients with an HIV viral load of less than 50 copies per mL and less than 400 copies per mL, and mean change in CD4 cell count, at weeks 156 and 240. FINDINGS: 1012 patients were screened for inclusion. 462 were treated with raltegravir and 237 with placebo. At week 156, 51% in the raltegravir group versus 22% in the placebo group (non-completer classed as failure) had viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL, and 54% versus 23% had viral loads of less than 400 copies per mL. Mean CD4 cell count increase (analysed by an observed failure approach) was 164 cells per μL versus 63 cells per μL. After week 156, 251 patients (54%) from the raltegravir group and 47 (20%) from the placebo group entered the open-label raltergravir phase; 221 (47%) versus 44 (19%) completed the entire study. At week 240, viral load was less than 50 copies per mL in 193 (42%) of all patients initially assigned to raltegravir and less than 400 copies per mL in 210 (45%); mean CD4 cell count increased by 183 cells per μL. Virological failure occurred in 166 raltegravir recipients (36%) during the double-blind phase and in 17 of all patients (6%) during the open-label phase. The most common drug-related adverse events at 5 years in both groups were nausea, headache, and diarrhoea, and occurred in similar proportions in each group. Laboratory test results were similar in both treatment groups and showed little change after year 2. INTERPRETATION: Raltegravir has a favourable long-term efficacy and safety profile in integrase-inhibitor-naive patients with triple-class resistant HIV in whom antiretroviral therapy is failing. Raltegravir is an alternative for treatment-experienced patients, particularly those with few treatment options

The Incidence of AIDS-Defining Illnesses at a Current CD4 Count ≥200 Cells/µL in the Post-Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Era

The incidence of AIDS was higher in patients with a current CD4 count of 500-749 cells/µL compared to 750-999 cells/µL, but did not decrease further at higher CD4 levels. Results were similar in those virologically suppressed on combination antiretroviral therapy, suggesting immune reconstitution is incomplete until CD4 >750/µ

Raltegravir with Optimized Background Therapy for Resistant HIV-1 Infection

Background: Raltegravir (MK-0518) is an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase active against HIV-1 susceptible or resistant to older antiretroviral drugs. Methods: We conducted two identical trials in different geographic regions to evaluate the safety and efficacy of raltegravir, as compared with placebo, in combination with optimized background therapy, in patients infected with HIV-1 that has triple-class drug resistance in whom antiretroviral therapy had failed. Patients were randomly assigned to raltegravir or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Results: In the combined studies, 699 of 703 randomized patients (462 and 237 in the raltegravir and placebo groups, respectively) received the study drug. Seventeen of the 699 patients (2.4%) discontinued the study before week 16. Discontinuation was related to the study treatment in 13 of these 17 patients: 7 of the 462 raltegravir recipients (1.5%) and 6 of the 237 placebo recipients (2.5%). The results of the two studies were consistent. At week 16, counting noncompletion as treatment failure, 355 of 458 raltegravir recipients (77.5%) had HIV-1 RNA levels below 400 copies per milliliter, as compared with 99 of 236 placebo recipients (41.9%, P<0.001). Suppression of HIV-1 RNA to a level below 50 copies per milliliter was achieved at week 16 in 61.8% of the raltegravir recipients, as compared with 34.7% of placebo recipients, and at week 48 in 62.1% as compared with 32.9% (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Without adjustment for the length of follow-up, cancers were detected in 3.5% of raltegravir recipients and in 1.7% of placebo recipients. The overall frequencies of drug-related adverse events were similar in the raltegravir and placebo groups. Conclusions: In HIV-infected patients with limited treatment options, raltegravir plus optimized background therapy provided better viral suppression than optimized background therapy alone for at least 48 weeks. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00293267 and NCT00293254.

Subgroup and Resistance Analyses of Raltegravir for Resistant HIV-1 Infection

Background: We evaluated the efficacy of raltegravir and the development of viral resistance in two identical trials involving patients who were infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) with triple-class drug resistance and in whom antiretroviral therapy had failed. Methods: We conducted subgroup analyses of the data from week 48 in both studies according to baseline prognostic factors. Genotyping of the integrase gene was performed in raltegravir recipients who had virologic failure. Results: Virologic responses to raltegravir were consistently superior to responses to placebo, regardless of the baseline values of HIV-1 RNA level; CD4 cell count; genotypic or phenotypic sensitivity score; use or nonuse of darunavir, enfuvirtide, or both in optimized background therapy; or demographic characteristics. Among patients in the two studies combined who were using both enfuvirtide and darunavir for the first time, HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter were achieved in 89% of raltegravir recipients and 68% of placebo recipients. HIV-1 RNA levels of less than 50 copies per milliliter were achieved in 69% and 80% of the raltegravir recipients and in 47% and 57% of the placebo recipients using either darunavir or enfuvirtide for the first time, respectively. At 48 weeks, 105 of the 462 raltegravir recipients (23%) had virologic failure. Genotyping was performed in 94 raltegravir recipients with virologic failure. Integrase mutations known to be associated with phenotypic resistance to raltegravir arose during treatment in 64 patients (68%). Forty-eight of these 64 patients (75%) had two or more resistance-associated mutations. Conclusions: When combined with an optimized background regimen in both studies, a consistently favorable treatment effect of raltegravir over placebo was shown in clinically relevant subgroups of patients, including those with baseline characteristics that typically predict a poor response to antiretroviral therapy: a high HIV-1 RNA level, low CD4 cell count, and low genotypic or phenotypic sensitivity score. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00293267 and NCT00293254.

Implementation of EACS vaccination recommendations among people living with HIV

Objectives With modern combination antiretroviral Treatment (cART) a normal life expectancy among people living with HIV (PLWH) has become reality if started early enough prior to the onset of more pronounced immunodeficiency. Therefore, prevention measures against other infectious diseases among this vulnerable group have gained increased attention. Indeed, the EACS guidelines recommend vaccinations against HAV, HBV, HPV, Influenza, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus pneumoniae and VZV in HIV-infected adults. Methods All PLWH under cART attending our ID outpatient clinic between April to June 2018, were assessed during consultation for vaccination status regarding pneumococcus, Hepatitis A and B, influenza, varicella, meningococcus and HPV using a pre-defined questionnaire, vaccination certificates and medical records. In addition, the cohort database was screened for Hepatitis A and B serology and HIV surrogate markers. Results A total of 305 PLWH (82.3% male, 17.7% female) was included, median age was 48 years (IQR 47-51). Median CD4 + T cell count was 543 (IQR 304-770), and for 297 (97.4%) PLWH CD4 + T cell count was >= 200/ul. The viral load was undetectable (< 40 copies/ml) in 289 (94.8%) cases. Highest vaccination rates were observed for HAV (87.4%), Streptococcus pneumoniae (77.4%) and Influenza (76.5%). 64.3% PLWH got vaccinated against HBV, whereas VZV vaccination only played a minor role, in the context of the high rate of cleared infections (99.0%). Lowest vaccination rates were detected for HPV (0%) and Neisseria meningitidis (3.0%). Conclusions Our data suggest that vaccination rates among PLWH are higher compared to the general German population. Implementation of EACS guidelines into daily routine though is not fully executed and the need for improving vaccination rates has to be emphasized. Centrally organized vaccination registers as well as electronic medical records could be helpful tools to detect a lack of vaccination coverage and send digital vaccination reminders particularly among risk groups

The transforming growth factor-β high-producer genotype is associated with response to hepatitis C virus-specific therapy in HIV-positive patients with acute hepatitis C

Background: Coinfection with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIV-positive patients is an emerging health problem. The factors affecting response to HCV-specific therapy are poorly understood but may involve host genetic factors. HCV NS5A-induced inhibition of transforming growth factor-[beta] signaling has been suggested as a potential mechanism involved in HCV pathogenesis. Transforming growth factor-[beta], a multifunctional cytokine, displays gene polymorphisms (transforming growth factor-[beta] codon 10T/C and codon 25G/C) associated with differential cytokine secretion. Here, we studied whether transforming growth factor-[beta] gene polymorphisms affect treatment response in HCV/HIV coinfection. Methods: Transforming growth factor-[beta] genotypes were determined in 60 HIV-positive patients with acute hepatitis C treated with pegylated interferon-[alpha]. Patients were classified into those with a high-producer genotype and others with non-high-producer genotypes. Rates of sustained virological responses were compared between high-producer and non-high-producer patients. As a control, 100 healthy, 201 HIV(+)/HCV(-), and 148 HCV(+)/HIV(-) subjects were studied. Results: Transforming growth factor-[beta] genotype distribution did not differ significantly between the groups. In HIV/HCV coinfection carriers of the transforming growth factor-[beta] high-producer genotype had significantly higher sustained virological response rates than patients with a transforming growth factor-[beta] non-high-producer genotype (75 vs. 41.7%; P = 0.039). In a forward-conditional stepwise regression model, transforming growth factor-[beta] high-producer genotype was confirmed as an independent positive predictor for sustained virological response in interferon-[alpha] therapy (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–13.4; P = 0.009). Conclusion: Response rates to interferon-[alpha] therapy are enhanced in acute HCV-infected HIV-positive patients carrying the transforming growth factor-[beta] ‘high-producer’ genotype. This finding may indicate that a transforming growth factor-[beta] ‘high-producer’ state can partially compensate HCV NS5A-induced inhibition of transforming growth factor-[beta] signaling

The TGF-β high producer genotype is associated with response to HCV-specific therapy in HIV-positive patients with acute hepatitis C

Background: Co-infection with the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HIVpositive patients is an emerging health problem. The factors affecting response to HCV-specific therapy are poorly understood but may involve host genetic factors. HCV NS5A-induced inhibition of TGF-b signaling has been suggested as a potential mechanism involved in HCV pathogenesis. TGF-b, a multifunctional cytokine, displays gene polymorphisms (TGF-b codon 10 T/C and codon 25G/C) associated with differential cytokine secretion. Here, we studied whether TGF-b gene polymorphisms affect the treatment response in HCV/HIV co-infection

Effects of the CCR5-Δ32 mutation on hepatitis C virus-specific immune responses in patients with haemophilia

In hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection antiviral T cells express the CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5). Their recruitment to the liver is an important step in the immune response. A 32 base pair deletion in the CCR5 gene leads to reduced expression and total loss of CCR5 in CCR5-Δ32 heterozygous and homozygous subjects, respectively. However, the role of this mutation for antiviral immunity remains unclear. Here, we analysed proliferation, IFN-γ and IL-4 secretion (ELISpot) induced by the HCV antigens core, NS3, NS4, and NS5a in 21 anti-HCV-positive haemophiliac patients in relationship to their CCR5 genotypes (CCR5 wildtype n = 10, CCR5-Δ32 heterozygous n = 5 and CCR5-Δ32 homozygous n = 6). Furthermore, T cell migration in response to the CCR5 ligands CCL3, -4 and -5 was studied. Overall IFN-γ responses to HCV proteins were only slightly greater in CCR5 wild-type patients than in CCR5-Δ32 carriers (0.6 versus 0.24 SFC/104 PBMC; p = 0.043). This difference was consistently seen with all tested HCV antigens. In contrast, neither T cell migration, nor PBMC proliferation, nor IL-4 production differed between CCR5 genotypes. Interruption of the CCR5 signalling pathway due to CCR5-Δ32 may potentially result in subtle reduction of HCV specific IFN-γ responses in anti-HCV-positive haemophiliac patients

The GNB3 C825T polymorphism affects response to HCV therapy with pegylated interferon in HCV/HIV co-infected but not in HCV mono-infected patients

Background/Aims: Response to HCV treatment with pegylated interferon-α is variable but might at least in part depend on genetic host factors. The G protein β3 unit (GNB3) C825T polymorphism has been shown to affect treatment response in HCV mono-infection. Here, we analyzed the impact of the GNB3 genotype in the context of HCV/HIV co-infection. Methods: HIV/HCV co-infected (n = 112) and HCV mono-infected patients (n = 150), receiving therapy with pegylated IFN-α/ribavirin, were enrolled into this study. Furthermore, we analyzed 220 healthy and 92 HIV mono-infected patients. GNB3 genotype was defined and correlated with respect to treatment response. Results: GNB3 genotype distribution differed significantly between HIV/HCV co-infected patients and HIV-positive/HCV-negative (p = 0.0002) or healthy controls (p = 0.03). Patients with a GNB3 CC genotype had significantly lower SVR rates as compared to carriers of a non-CC genotype (52% versus 77%; p = 0.018). In a logistic regression analysis the GNB3 genotype and the HCV genotype were significantly associated with response to treatment (p = 0.018). In contrast to HIV/HCV co-infected patients, GNB3 genotype did not affect response to treatment in HCV mono-infected patients. Conclusions: The GNB3 825 CC genotype is associated with poor SVR rates in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. This underlines the impact of genetic host factors for treatment response