ESPEN Practical Guideline: clinical nutrition in liver disease

Desnutrición; Insuficiencia hepática aguda grave; CirrosisMalnutrition; Acute liver failure; CirrhosisDesnutrició; Insuficiència hepàtica aguda greu; CirrosiIntroducción: la Guía Práctica se basa en la actual guía científica de la ESPEN sobre nutrición clínica en las enfermedades hepáticas. Métodos: se ha reducido y transformado en diagramas de flujo para facilitar su uso en la práctica clínica. La guía está dedicada a todos los profesionales, incluidos médicos, dietistas, nutricionistas y enfermeras, que trabajan con pacientes con enfermedad hepática crónica. Resultados: la guía presenta un total de 103 pronunciamientos y recomendaciones con breves comentarios para el manejo nutricional y metabólico de pacientes con (i) insuficiencia hepática aguda grave, (ii) esteatohepatitis alcohólica, (iii) enfermedad hepática grasa no alcohólica, (iv) cirrosis hepática, y (v) cirugía o trasplante de hígado. Conclusión: las recomendaciones relacionadas con enfermedades están precedidas por recomendaciones generales sobre el diagnóstico del estado nutricional en los pacientes hepáticos y sobre las complicaciones hepáticas asociadas a la nutrición médica.Background: the Practical Guideline is based on the current scientifi c ESPEN guide on Clinical Nutrition in Liver Disease. Methods: it has been shortened and transformed into fl ow charts for easier use in clinical practice. The guideline is dedicated to all professionals including physicians, dieticians, nutritionists and nurses working with patients with chronic liver disease. Results: a total of 103 statements and recommendations are presented with short commentaries for the nutritional and metabolic management of patients with (i) acute liver failure, (ii) alcoholic steatohepatitis, (iii) non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, (iv) liver cirrhosis, and (v) liver surgery/ transplantation. Disease-related recommendations are preceded by general recommendations on the diagnosis of nutritional status in liver patients and on liver complications associated with medical nutrition. Conclusion: this Practical Guideline gives guidance to health care providers involved in the management of liver disease on how to offer optimal nutritional care

Determinants of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis : A Nation-wide Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare and validate the different classifications of severity in acute pancreatitis (AP) and to investigate which characteristics of the disease are associated with worse outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: AP is a heterogeneous disease, ranging from uneventful cases to patients with considerable morbidity and high mortality rates. Severity classifications based on legitimate determinants of severity are important to correctly describe the course of disease. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study involving patients with AP from 23 hospitals in Spain. The Atlanta Classification (AC), Revised Atlanta Classification (RAC), and Determinant-based Classification (DBC) were compared. Binary logistic multivariate analysis was performed to investigate independent determinants of severity. RESULTS: A total of 1655 patients were included; 70 patients (4.2%) died. RAC and DBC were equally superior to AC for describing the clinical course of AP. Although any kind of organ failure was associated with increased morbidity and mortality, persistent organ failure (POF) was the most significant determinant of severity. All local complications were associated with worse outcomes. Infected pancreatic necrosis correlated with high morbidity, but in the presence of POF, it was not associated to higher mortality when compared with sterile necrotizing pancreatitis. Exacerbation of previous comorbidity was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: The RAC and DBC both signify an advance in the description and differentiation of AP patients. Herein, we describe the complications of the disease independently associated to morbidity and mortality. Our findings are valuable not only when designing future studies on AP but also for the improvement of current classifications