22 research outputs found

    Variables considered for use as covariates of small mammal prey density in the shrub-steppe and grassland regions of Wyoming, 2010–2012.

    No full text
    <p>Variables considered for use as covariates of small mammal prey density in the shrub-steppe and grassland regions of Wyoming, 2010–2012.</p

    Locations surveyed for small mammal prey species in three non-mountainous ecoregions of Wyoming, 2010–2012.

    No full text
    <p>Survey locations are shown as block dots, small black squares show the extent of the randomly selected townships in the study area. Inset shows location of Wyoming in the United States. See text for more details on sampling design.</p

    Predicting above-ground density and distribution of small mammal prey species at large spatial scales

    No full text
    Datasets containing distances and covariate values for a study on small mammal density and remotely-sensed environmental covariates in shrub-steppe and grassland ecosystems in Wyoming, USA, 2010-2012

    Developing priorities for metapopulation conservation at the landscape scale: Wolverines in the Western United States

    Get PDF
    Wildlife populations are often influenced by multiple political jurisdictions. This is particularly true for wide-ranging, low-density carnivores whose populations have often contracted and remain threatened, heightening the need for geographically coordinated priorities at the landscape scale. Yet even as modern policies facilitate species recoveries, gaps in knowledge of historical distributions, population capacities, and potential for genetic exchange inhibit development of population-level conservation priorities. Wolverines are an 8–18 kg terrestrial weasel (Mustelidae) that naturally exist at low densities (~5/1000 km2) in cold, often snow-covered areas. Wolverines were extirpated, or nearly so, from the contiguous United States by 1930. We used a resource selection function to (1) predict habitat suitable for survival, reproduction and dispersal of wolverines across the western US, (2) make a rough estimate of population capacity, and (3) develop conservation priorities at the metapopulation scale. Primary wolverine habitat (survival) existed in island-like fashion across the western US, and we estimated capacity to be 644 wolverines (95% CI = 506–1881). We estimated current population size to be approximately half of capacity. Areas we predicted suitable for male dispersal linked all patches, but some potential core areas appear to be relatively isolated for females. Reintroduction of wolverines to the Southern Rockies and Sierra- Nevadas has the potential to increase population size by \u3e50% and these regions may be robust to climate change. The Central Linkage Region is an area of great importance for metapopulation function, thus warranting collaborative strategies for maintaining high survival rates, high reproductive rates, and dispersal capabilities. Our analysis can help identify dispersal corridors, release locations for reintroductions, and monitoring targets. The process we used can serve as an example for developing collaborative, landscapescale, conservation priorities for data-sparse metapopulations

    Abundance model selection results for small mammal species groups surveyed in the shrub-steppe and grassland regions of Wyoming, 2010–2012.

    No full text
    <p>Abundance model selection results for small mammal species groups surveyed in the shrub-steppe and grassland regions of Wyoming, 2010–2012.</p

    Occasion-specific density estimates (individuals/km<sup>2</sup>; standard deviation in parentheses) averaged over all sampled sites for the most abundant small mammal species groups modeled from line transect surveys in Wyoming, 2010–2012.

    No full text
    <p>Occasion-specific density estimates (individuals/km<sup>2</sup>; standard deviation in parentheses) averaged over all sampled sites for the most abundant small mammal species groups modeled from line transect surveys in Wyoming, 2010–2012.</p

    Modeled response of density (individuals/km<sup>2</sup>) of small mammal species groups to proportion of herbaceous cover or bare ground.

    No full text
    <p>Top panels show herbaceous cover, bottom panels show bare ground; dotted lines show 95% confidence interval. Panel A) shows white-tailed prairie dogs, B) least chipmunks, C) Wyoming ground squirrels, and D) leporids (<i>Sylvilagus</i> sp. and <i>Lepus townsendii</i>).</p
    corecore