93 research outputs found

    Immunotherapy and the Spectrum of Kidney Disease: Should We Individualize the Treatment?

    Get PDF
    Chronic kidney disease; Dialysis; ImmunotherapyEnfermedad renal cronica; Diálisis; InmunoterapiaMalaltia renal crònica; Diàlisi; ImmunoteràpiaThe new targeted cancer therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been demonstrated to improve the survival of oncological patients, even in cases of metastatic cancer. In the past 5 years, several studies have revealed that ICI can produce several immune-mediated toxicities involving different organs, such as the skin, the gastrointestinal tract, the liver, and, of course, the kidney. The most frequent lesion of immunotoxicity in the kidney is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), although other nephropathies have also been described as a consequence of the use of ICI, such as glomerulonephritis and acute thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. In addition, kidney rejection has also been reported in kidney transplant patients treated with ICI. Normally randomized clinical trials with ICI exclude patients with end-stage kidney disease, namely, patients undergoing dialysis and kidney transplant patients. Several important questions need to be addressed in relation to immunotherapy and patients with kidney disease: (a) when to start corticosteroid therapy in a patient with suspected acute kidney injury (AKI) related to ICI, (b) the moment of nephrologist referral and kidney biopsy indication, (c) management of ICI in patients undergoing dialysis, and (d) the effect of ICI in kidney transplantation, immunosuppressive personalized treatment, and risk of allograft rejection in kidney transplant patients. The objective of this review was to summarize the recently published literature on a wide spectrum of kidney disease patients with cancer and ICI. This review will address three main important groups of individuals with kidney disease and cancer immunotherapy, AKI associated with ICI, patients undergoing dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients. We believe that the information provided in this review will enlighten the personalized ICI treatment in individuals with a broader spectrum of kidney diseases.This research was funded by ISCIIII-FEDER and ISCIII-RETICS REDinREN, Grant Numbers PI17/00257, PI21/01292, RD16/0009/0030, and RICORS RD21/0005/0016. Enfermedad Glomerular Compleja del Sistema Nacional de Salud (CSUR), enfermedades glomerulares complejas

    Estudio de dos situaciones especiales en pacientes con infección crónica por el virus de la hepatitis B: Eficacia y seguridad de los análogos de nucleós(t)idos de segunda generación en una cohorte de práctica clínica real y nuevos biomarcadores para la identificación de portadores inactivos /

    Get PDF
    La hepatitis B es un problema de salud mundial, con unos 400 millones de personas infectadas crónicamente. En nuestro medio se calcula una prevalencia del 0.7%, siendo la mayoría de los sujetos HBeAg negativo. En esta fase de la infección, uno de los retos es distinguir entre aquellos sujetos portadores inactivos, que presentarán un buen pronóstico de la enfermedad a largo plazo, y los pacientes con hepatitis crónica HBeAg negativo, que tienen riesgo de desarrollar fibrosis hepática y por tanto precisar tratamiento antiviral. El primer trabajo se centró en pacientes bajo tratamiento antiviral con análogos de nucleós(t)idos de segunda generación (Entecavir y Tenofovir). Las hipótesis del mismo fueron que la eficacia y tasa de efectos adversos en práctica clínica era similar a la de los estudios de registro y la validación del modelo Page-B para predicción del riesgo de carcinoma hepatocelular (CHC). Para dicho fin se analizó la base CIBERHEP que incluye sujetos con infección crónica por el VHB, seleccionándose un total de 609 pacientes caucásicos en tratamiento con Tenofovir o Entecavir. Las tasas de respuesta virológica y bioquímica fueron altas, con pocos efectos adversos y discontinuación de tratamiento, sin observarse deterioro de la función renal. A pesar de la supresión de la replicación viral, se observaron 12 casos de CHC, número inferior a los estimados por la puntuación Page-B. Al igual que en la cohorte original, todos aquellos sujetos que presentaron CHC tenían basalmente una puntuación Page-B ≥10 puntos, confirmándose el valor predictivo negativo del 100% de dicho punto de corte. La hipótesis del segundo de los estudios, fue que los niveles séricos de antígeno de superficie (HBsAg) o antígeno relacionado con el core (HBcrAg) podrían ser útiles para identificar a los verdaderos portadores inactivos del VHB. Para ello se realizó un estudio prospectivo con al 3 determinaciones analíticas en 1 año para caracterizar a los sujetos como portadores inactivos (niveles de alanino transferasa persistentemente normales y ADN VHB≤2.000 UI/mL) o con actividad por el VHB. En primer lugar se observó que los niveles de HBsAg estaban influidos el por genotipo del VHB, dato que dificultó la búsqueda de un único punto de corte con altos índices diagnósticos en todos los genotipos, siendo el HBsAg 85% en todos los genotipos excepto el H o F (73%).Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a worldwide health problem, with around 400 million people chronically infected. In our setting, the prevalence is 0.7% and the majority of subjects are HBeAg negative. In this stage of the disease, one of the most challenging issues is to discern between the inactive carriers, who have a long-term good prognosis of the disease, and patients with HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B, who are at risk of fibrosis development and therefore may require antiviral therapy. The first study of this thesis is focus on patients undergoing antiviral therapy with second generation nucleos(t)tides analogs (Entecavir and Tenofovir). The hypotheses were that the effectiveness and rate of side effects in daily clinical practice were similar to the registration studies and the validation of the Page-B score for prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development. From the collaborative database CIBERHEP, 609 caucasian subjects with chronic hepatitis B treated with Tenofovir or Entecavir were selected. The rates of biochemical and virological response were very high, and no worsening on renal function was observed. Despite suppression of viral replication, 12 cases of HCC were reported, a number lower to the estimated by the Page-B score. Similar to the original cohort, in the CIBERHEP all patients who developed HCC presented a baseline Page-B punctuation ≥10 points, supporting the previously described 100% negative predictive value of that cut-off. The hypothesis of the second study was that the serum levels of hepatitis B antigen (HBsAg) o core-related antigen (HBcrAg) could be useful for identification of HBV inactive carriers. To achieve this goal, a prospective work with 3 consecutive blood analyses throughout 1 year was carried out. Subjects were classified as inactive carriers (defined as persistently normal alanine transferase levels and HBV DNA ≤2.000 IU/mL) or subjects with HBV activity. Firstly, it was observed that HBsAg levels varied across the different HBV genotypes. This finding hindered the search of a unique HBsAg cut-off for diagnosing the inactive carrier state among the different HBV genotypes. Previously described HBsAg 3 logIU/mL was only useful of genotype D. However, HBcrAg did no vary among genotypes, and on the whole, the diagnostic accuracy of HBcrAg was higher than HBsAg levels. The combination on a single determination of HBcrAg ≤3 logU/mL plus HBV DNA ≤2.000 IU/mL presented a diagnostic accuracy ≥85% in all genotypes except H or F (73%)

    Effectiveness, safety/tolerability of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV in patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 with/without HIV-1 co-infection, chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage IIIb-V and dialysis in spanish clinical practice – Vie-KinD study

    Get PDF
    HIV and Hepatitis C Coinfection; Chronic Renal Failure; RibavirinCoinfecció VIH i Hepatitis C; Insuficiència Renal Crònica; RibavirinaCoinfección VIH y Hepatitis C; Insuficiencia Renal Crónica; RibavirinaBackground and aims: Limited data are available on the effectiveness and tolerability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapies in the real world for HCV-infected patients with comorbidities. This study aimed to describe the effectiveness of OBV/PTV/r ± DSV (3D/2D regimen) with or without ribavirin (RBV) in HCV or HCV/HIV co-infected patients with GT1/GT4 and CKD (IIIb-V stages), including those under hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis in routine clinical practice in Spain in 2015. Material and methods: Non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter data collection study in 31 Spanish sites. Socio-demographic, clinical variables, study treatment characteristics, effectiveness and tolerability data were collected from medical records. Results: Data from 135 patients with a mean age (SD) of 58.3 (11.4) years were analyzed: 92.6% GT1 (81.6% GT1b and 17.6% GT1a) and 7.4% GT4, 14 (10.4%) HIV/HCV co-infected, 19.0% with fibrosis F3 and 28.1% F4 by FibroScan®, 52.6% were previously treated with pegIFN and RBV. 11.1%, 14.8% and 74.1% of patients had CKD stage IIIb, IV and V respectively. 68.9% of patients were on hemodialysis; 8.9% on peritoneal dialysis and 38.5% had history of renal transplant. A total of 125 (96.2%) of 135 patients were treated with 3D, 10 (7.4%) with 2D and 30.4% received RBV. The overall intention-to-treat (ITT) sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) was 92.6% (125/135) and the overall modified-ITT (mITT) SVR12 was 99.2% (125/126). The SVR12 rates (ITT) per sub-groups were: HCV mono-infected (91.7%), HCV/HIV co-infected (100%), GT1 (92.0%), GT4 (100%), CKD stage IIIb (86.7%), stage IV (95%) and stage V (93%). Among the 10 non-SVR there was only 1 virologic failure (0.7%); 4 patients had missing data due lost to follow up (3.0%) and 5 patients discontinued 3D/2D regimen (3.7%): 4 due to severe adverse events (including 3 deaths) and 1 patient´s decision. Conclusions: These results have shown that 3D/2D regimens are effective and tolerable in patients with advanced CKD including those in dialysis with GT 1 or 4 chronic HCV mono-infection and HIV/HCV coinfection in a real-life cohort. The overall SVR12 rates were 92.6% (ITT) and 99.2% (mITT) without clinically relevant changes in eGFR until 12 weeks post-treatment. These results are consistent with those reported in clinical trials.MCL has served as consultant for AbbVie, MSD, Janssen, BMS and Gilead; MRB has received grant research from Gilead Science, and speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead and MSD; MR has received speaker fees from AbbVie; MD has received grant support and consultancy fees from AbbVie, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead and Merck, Sharp & Dhome; FGR has served as speaker for AbbVie, Gilead and BMS; MLM has served as a speaker for AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, MSD and ViiV; as a consultant for AbbVie, BMS and Janssen and has received research funding from FIPSE 36465/03, FIPSE 36680/07.-NEAT IG5 (NEAT is a project funded by the European Union under the 6th Framework programme) contract number LSHP-CT-2006-037570; MAC has served as a consultant for Gilead and and ViiV healthcare, and has received speaker fees from Janssens, Gilead, ViiV Healthcare; MMA reports personal fees from ViiV Healthcare, Gilead Sciences, Merck, Janssen, AbbVie and ABBOTT Laboratories, outside the submitted work; AR has received consultancy and speaker fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences and Merck Sharp & Dohme; JM has received honoraria, speaker fees, consultant fees or funds for research from AbbVie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Roche and ViiV; EGP has received speaker fees from AbbVie and Gilead; LGB has served as consultant for AbbVie and Intercept and has received speaker fees from Gilead and MSD; AA, RMG, CB, TAE, MLG, BPL, IC, SB, LB, JGS, MJP, IMG, LM, IdlS, ML and JEL don't have a financial interest or affiliation with one or more organizations that could be perceived as a real or apparent conflict of interest in the context of the subject of this paper; CdA and AM are paid employees of AbbVie and may hold stock or options. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the 'author contributions' section. The design, study conduct, and financial support for the study were provided by AbbVie. AbbVie participated in the interpretation of data, review, and approval of the manuscript

    Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hepatitis B and C elimination: An EASL survey

    Get PDF
    Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C virus; COVID-19 pandemicVirus de la hepatitis B; Virus de la hepatitis C; Pandemia de COVID-19Virus de l'hepatitis B; Virus de l'hepatitis C; Pandèmia del COVID-19Background & Aims The World Health Organization (WHO) HBV and HCV elimination targets, set in 2016 and based on projections to 2030, were unable to consider the impact of intervening factors. To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on viral hepatitis elimination programs, the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) conducted a survey in liver centers worldwide in 2021. Methods A web-based questionnaire was distributed (May-July 2021) to all EASL members representing clinical units providing HBV and HCV hepatitis care. Results are expressed as absolute numbers and reduction rates for each care activity. Results Data were collected from 32 European and 12 non-European clinical centers. Between January 2019 (pre-pandemic) and December 2020 (during the pandemic), chronic HBV consultations decreased by 32% and 26%, new referrals by 38% and 39%, HBV testing rates by 39% and 21% (for HBsAg detection) and 30% and 22% (for HBV DNA detection), and new HBV treatments by 20% and 44% (p = 0.328) in European and non-European centers, respectively. With regard to HCV during the same time frame, the overall reductions were 39% and 50% for consultations, 49% and 49% for new referrals, 11% and 38% for HCV RNA detection, and 51% and 54% for new HCV antiviral treatments for European and non-European Centers, respectively (p = 0.071). Conclusions All steps in the viral hepatitis care cascade have been hampered by the COVID-19 pandemic, with a comparable impact across different centers. These data reaffirm the pandemic’s major effect on global viral hepatitis elimination programs and suggest that actions to achieve the WHO 2030 targets should be reconsidered and revised to account for each country's progress relative to pre-pandemic values
    corecore