6 research outputs found

    Heat shock protein expression in sleep deprivation and recovery sleep

    Get PDF

    Heat shock protein expression in sleep deprivation and recovery sleep

    Get PDF
    Les livres que Pascal Quignard publie depuis prĂšs d’un demi-siĂšcle, Ă©loignĂ©s de la pratique de l’autofiction, se nourrissent nĂ©anmoins des Ă©vĂ©nements marquants de sa vie (naissance, sexualitĂ© prĂ©coce, emprise maternelle, ses rencontres), comme de ses lectures dans tous les domaines de la connaissance. Il lit, il Ă©crit, il publie, partagĂ© entre son besoin vital de solitude pour lire, pour penser, pour mĂ©diter, pour Ă©crire, et la nĂ©cessitĂ© de rĂ©intĂ©grer le groupe au moment de la publication. Ses livres, entre rĂȘve et rĂ©alitĂ©, ne revendiquent aucune doctrine, ne prĂ©tendent Ă  aucun enseignement, mĂȘme s’ils ne cessent de se nourrir de notre histoire contemporaine comme de celle du passĂ© le plus lointain. Ils sont une invitation Ă  penser. Depuis quelques annĂ©es, Pascal Quignard est sur scĂšne, seul ou avec d’autres artistes, jouant du piano, lisant, interprĂ©tant ses textes et donnant ainsi chair Ă  ses livres.The books Pascal Quignard has been publishing for half a century, while far removed from autofiction, are nevertheless informed by the landmark events of his life (birth, early sexuality, maternal control, encounters) as by his readings in all fields of knowledge. He reads, he writes, he publishes, divided between his vital need for solitude, in which to read, to think, to meditate, to write, and the need to reintegrate the group at the time of publication. His books, between dream and reality, do not subscribe to a doctrine or pretend to teach, even if they are informed by our contemporary history and the history of our most distant past. They are an invitation to think. For several years now, Pascal Quignard has been on stage, alone or with other artists, playing the piano, reading, interpreting his texts, and thereby bringing his books alive

    High systemic and tumor-associated IL-8 correlates with reduced clinical benefit of PD-L1 blockade

    No full text
    Although elevated plasma interleukin-8 (pIL-8) has been associated with poor outcome to immune checkpoint blockade 1, this has not been comprehensively evaluated in large randomized studies. Here we analyzed circulating pIL-8 and IL8 gene expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumors of patients treated with atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody) from multiple randomized trials representing 1,445 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. High levels of IL-8 in plasma, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumors were associated with decreased efficacy of atezolizumab in patients with mUC and metastatic renal cell carcinoma, even in tumors that were classically CD8+ T cell inflamed. Low baseline pIL-8 in patients with mUC was associated with increased response to atezolizumab and chemotherapy. Patients with mUC who experienced on-treatment decreases in pIL-8 exhibited improved overall survival when treated with atezolizumab but not with chemotherapy. Single-cell RNA sequencing of the immune compartment showed that IL8 is primarily expressed in circulating and intratumoral myeloid cells and that high IL8 expression is associated with downregulation of the antigen-presentation machinery. Therapies that can reverse the impacts of IL-8-mediated myeloid inflammation will be essential for improving outcomes of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

    First-In-Human Phase I Study of the OX40 Agonist MOXR0916 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

    No full text
    Purpose: OX40, a receptor transiently expressed by T cells upon antigen recognition, is associated with costimulation of effector T cells and impairment of regulatory T-cell function. This first-in-human study evaluated MOXR0916, a humanized effector-competent agonist IgG1 monoclonal anti-OX40 antibody. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors were treated with MOXR0916 intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W). A 3+3 dose-escalation stage (0.2-1,200 mg; n = 34) was followed by expansion cohorts at 300 mg (n = 138) for patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and triple-negative breast cancer. Results: MOXR0916 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. An MTD was not reached. Most patients (95%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE); 56% of AEs, mostly grade 1-2, were related to MOXR0916. Most common treatment-related AEs included fatigue (17%), diarrhea (8%), myalgia (7%), nausea (6%), decreased appetite (6%), and infusion-related reaction (5%). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were dose proportional between 80 and 1,200 mg and supported Q3W administration. The recommended expansion dose based on PK and OX40 receptor saturation was 300 mg Q3W. Immune activation and upregulation of PD-L1 was observed in a subset of paired tumor biopsies. One renal cell carcinoma patient experienced a confirmed partial response. Overall, 33% of patients achieved stable disease. Conclusions: Although objective responses were rarely observed with MOXR0916 monotherapy, the favorable safety profile and evidence of tumor immune activation in a subset of patients support further investigation in combination with complementary agents such as PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists.N

    First-In-Human Phase I Study of the OX40 Agonist MOXR0916 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

    No full text
    Purpose: OX40, a receptor transiently expressed by T cells upon antigen recognition, is associated with costimulation of effector T cells and impairment of regulatory T-cell function. This first-inhuman study evaluated MOXR0916, a humanized effector-competent agonist IgG1 monoclonal anti-OX40 antibody. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic refractory solid tumors were treated with MOXR0916 intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W). A 3ĂŸ3 dose-escalation stage (0.2–1,200 mg; n ÂŒ 34) was followed by expansion cohorts at 300 mg (n ÂŒ 138) for patients with melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non–small cell lung carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and triple-negative breast cancer. Results: MOXR0916 was well tolerated with no dose-limiting toxicities observed. An MTD was not reached. Most patients (95%) experienced at least one adverse event (AE); 56% of AEs, mostly grade 1–2, were related to MOXR0916. Most common treatment-related AEs included fatigue (17%), diarrhea (8%), myalgia (7%), nausea (6%), decreased appetite (6%), and infusion-related reaction (5%). Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were dose proportional between 80 and 1,200 mg and supported Q3W administration. The recommended expansion dose based on PK and OX40 receptor saturation was 300 mg Q3W. Immune activation and upregulation of PD-L1 was observed in a subset of paired tumor biopsies. One renal cell carcinoma patient experienced a confirmed partial response. Overall, 33% of patients achieved stable disease. Conclusions: Although objective responses were rarely observed with MOXR0916 monotherapy, the favorable safety profile and evidence of tumor immune activation in a subset of patients support further investigation in combination with complementary agents such as PD-1/PD-L1 antagonists.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
    corecore