Lung Cancer in a U.S. Population with Low to Moderate Arsenic Exposure

BackgroundLittle is known about the carcinogenic potential of arsenic in areas with low to moderate concentrations of arsenic (< 100 microg/L) in drinking water.ObjectivesWe examined associations between arsenic and lung cancer.MethodsA population-based case-control study of primary incident lung cancer was conducted in 10 counties in two U.S. states, New Hampshire and Vermont. The study included 223 lung cancer cases and 238 controls, each of whom provided toenail clippings for arsenic exposure measurement by inductively coupled-plasma mass spectrometry. We estimated odds ratios (ORs) of the association between arsenic exposure and lung cancer using unconditional logistic regression with adjustment for potential confounders (age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking pack-years, education, body mass index, fish servings per week, and toenail selenium level).ResultsArsenic exposure was associated with small-cell and squamous-cell carcinoma of the lung [OR = 2.75; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-7.57] for toenail arsenic concentration > or = 0.114 microg/g, versus < 0.05 microg/g. A history of lung disease (bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or fibrosis) was positively associated with lung cancer (OR = 2.86; 95% CI, 1.39-5.91). We also observed an elevated risk of lung cancer among participants with a history of lung disease and toenail arsenic > or = 0.05 microg/g (OR = 4.78; 95% CI, 1.87-12.2) than among individuals with low toenail arsenic and no history of lung disease.ConclusionAlthough this study supports the possibility of an increased risk of specific lung cancer histologic types at lower levels of arsenic exposure, we recommend large-scale population-based studies

A genome-wide meta-analysis yields 46 new loci associating with biomarkers of iron homeostasis

Bell et al. report 46 new loci associated with biomarkers of iron homeostasis, including ferritin levels, iron binding capacity, and iron saturation, in the Icelandic, Danish and UK populations. The associated loci point to new iron-regulating proteins and important genetic differences between men and women

A genome-wide meta-analysis yields 46 new loci associating with biomarkers of iron homeostasis

Abstract: Iron is essential for many biological functions and iron deficiency and overload have major health implications. We performed a meta-analysis of three genome-wide association studies from Iceland, the UK and Denmark of blood levels of ferritin (N = 246,139), total iron binding capacity (N = 135,430), iron (N = 163,511) and transferrin saturation (N = 131,471). We found 62 independent sequence variants associating with iron homeostasis parameters at 56 loci, including 46 novel loci. Variants at DUOX2, F5, SLC11A2 and TMPRSS6 associate with iron deficiency anemia, while variants at TF, HFE, TFR2 and TMPRSS6 associate with iron overload. A HBS1L-MYB intergenic region variant associates both with increased risk of iron overload and reduced risk of iron deficiency anemia. The DUOX2 missense variant is present in 14% of the population, associates with all iron homeostasis biomarkers, and increases the risk of iron deficiency anemia by 29%. The associations implicate proteins contributing to the main physiological processes involved in iron homeostasis: iron sensing and storage, inflammation, absorption of iron from the gut, iron recycling, erythropoiesis and bleeding/menstruation

Oral versus intravenous administration of vinorelbine as a single agent for the first-line treatment of metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): A randomized phase II trial

Many patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) cannot tolerate intravenous chemotherapy. Orally active agents would be more convenient and thus could improve their quality of life. A total of 189 patients were randomized 2:1, 181 patients received treatment, 120 PO and 61 IV vinorelbine, 158 patients had stage IV and 31 stage IIIB disease. Among patients who received PO vinorelbine, the median age was 72 years, 62% were males; the Karnofski Performance Status (KPS) was 80-100 in 71%. These compare with a median age of 70 years, 56% male, and KPS of 80-100 in 65% of patients who received IV vinorelbine. Oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 was to be dose-escalated to 70 mg/m2 after the initial 3-weekly doses if there was no unacceptable toxicity. Intravenous vinorelbine was to be given 30 mg/m2 weekly. Five patients (4%) on PO and 8 (13%) on IV vinorelbine had a confirmed partial response, 56 (44%) and 29 (46%) had stable disease, respectively. Median time-to-disease-progression was 16.6 weeks (PO) versus 23.9 weeks (IV), and the median survival was 26 weeks (PO) versus 40.9 weeks IV vinorelbine. Median survival on PO vinorelbine for patients with KPS 60-70 was 8.3 weeks versus 43 weeks (IV). On PO vinorelbine 59 patients (57%) were dose escalated, 9 (7.5%) were dose reduced, and 10 (8.3%) did not receive PO vinorelbine at week 4. Pharmacokinetic studies confirmed PO vinorelbine exposure was significantly less than IV exposure. The inability to escalate the dose of PO vinorelbine above 60 mg/m2 weekly resulted in inferiority to IV vinorelbine at 30 mg/m2 weekly, especially in patients with poor performance status