3,156 research outputs found
1991 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, one instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1991, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 65 separation violations were recorded in 1991, representing a 92% reduction from the 1976 baseline and 48% from 1990. 81 jail removal violations occurred, representing a 90% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 18% reduction from 1990.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Common Offense Acronyms and 1991 Violations by Offense Type and Locatio
FY 1997 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 1 instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in FY 1997, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. 2 separation violations were recorded in FY 1997, representing a 99.8% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 68 jail removal violations were projected (52 actual), representing an 92% reduction from the CY 1980 baseline. Originally completed December 1997; revised July 1999.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. Full Compliance Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Fiscal Year 1997 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
Predictive Non-equilibrium Social Science
Non-Equilibrium Social Science (NESS) emphasizes dynamical phenomena, for
instance the way political movements emerge or competing organizations
interact. This paper argues that predictive analysis is an essential element of
NESS, occupying a central role in its scientific inquiry and representing a key
activity of practitioners in domains such as economics, public policy, and
national security. We begin by clarifying the distinction between models which
are useful for prediction and the much more common explanatory models studied
in the social sciences. We then investigate a challenging real-world predictive
analysis case study, and find evidence that the poor performance of standard
prediction methods does not indicate an absence of human predictability but
instead reflects (1.) incorrect assumptions concerning the predictive utility
of explanatory models, (2.) misunderstanding regarding which features of social
dynamics actually possess predictive power, and (3.) practical difficulties
exploiting predictive representations.Comment: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1212.680
Disproportionate Detention of Minorities: A Case Study of One State's Compliance with the Mandates of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act
Pursuant to Section 223(a)(23) of the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, states must examine whether minority youth are disproportionately detained in relation to their proportion in the general population. For a preliminary assessment of Alaska’s compliance, five and a half years of detention data (1990–June 1995) for the state of Alaska are analyzed to assess the detention of minority and non-minority youth. A number of factors are used to compare racial groups: type of offense, prior record, gender, age, length of detention, etc.This study was made possible by a gift from Cook Inlet Region, Inc. and was conducted in collaboration with the Alaska Division of Family and Youth Services.Abstract /
[Introduction] /
Background /
Background of the Study /
Findings /
Discussion /
References /
Appendix 1. Repeat Offender
1992 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, one instance of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1992, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 11 separation violations were recorded in 1992, representing a 99% reduction from the 1976 baseline and 83% from 1992. 44 jail removal violations occurred, representing a 95% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 46% reduction from 1992.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. Common Offense Acronyms and 1992 Violations by Offense Type and Locatio
Recommended from our members
Squamous cell carcinoma of the dorsal hands and feet after repeated exposure to ultraviolet nail lamps
Gel nails are a common artificial nail option. Ultraviolet (UV) nail lamps are commonly used to cure gel nails. Ultraviolet A radiation is a known mutagen that penetrates into the nail bed. Although previously reported, the role of UV nail lamps in the carcinogenesis of both keratinocyte carcinoma and melanoma remains controversial. Herein, we report a patient taking the photosensitizing agent hydrochlorothiazide who developed numerous squamous cell carcinomas on the dorsal hands and feet with a 10-year history of UV nail light exposure every 2-3 weeks
FY 1995 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, 13 instances of a status offender held in secure detention were recorded in FY 1995, compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of CY 1976. 11 separation violations were recorded and 23 projected in FY 1995, representing a 97.3% reduction from the CY 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 143 jail removal violations were projected, representing an 83% reduction from the CY 1980 baseline. Originally completed Feb 1996; revised June 1996.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. FY95 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
1993 Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act Compliance Monitoring Report
The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act (JJDPA) mandates removal of status offenders and nonoffenders from secure detention and correctional facilities, sight and sound separation of juveniles and adults, and removal of juveniles from adult jails and lockups. In Alaska, no instances of a status offender held in secure detention was recorded in 1993, as compared with 485 violations in the baseline year of 1976. 16 separation violations were recorded in 1992, representing a 98% reduction from the 1976 baseline of 824 violations. 59 jail removal violations were projected, representing a 94% reduction from the 1980 baseline and an 25% increase from 1992.Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Family and Youth ServicesA. General Information /
B. Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
C. De Minimis Request /
D. Progress Made in Achieving Removal of Status Offenders and Nonoffenders from Secure Detention and Correctional Facilities /
E. Separation of Juveniles and Adults /
F. Removal of Juveniles from Adult Jails and Lockups /
G. De Minimis Request: Numerical /
H. De Minimis Request: Substantive /
APPENDICES /
I. Method of Analysis /
II. 1993 Violations by Offense Type and Location /
III. Common Offense Acronym
Results From the Long-Term Inmate Survey: Focus on Child Abuse Histories
This report of long-term inmates in Alaska correctional facilities attempts to describe the childhood experiences of a sample of long-term inmates, address the "cycle of abuse" issue; and present the correlates of abuse which may impact the pattern of offending or inmate functioning. Over 80 percent of long-term inmates report having been physically abused as children; over 65 percent report having suffered neglect.Alaska Department of CorrectionsResults from the Long Term Inmate Study: Focus on Child Abuse Histories / Incidence of Child Abuse and the Relationship to Criminality / Measuring Child Abuse and Neglect: A Review of Methods / Survey Methods and Administration / An Assessment of Survey Biases / Tables to Support Profile Analysis / Personal Interview Administration and Results / Correlates of Abus
- …