Evaluation of biochemical response on early prostate cancer: comparison between treatment with external beam radiation alone and in combination with high-dose rate conformal brachytherapy boost

OBJECTIVE: To compare the biochemical response in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer treated with external beam radiation therapy alone or in combination with conformal brachytherapy boost. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From November 1997 to January 2000, 74 patients received 45 Gy of pelvic external irradiation and four were treated with high dose rate iridium-192 conformal boost implants of 4 Gy each (BT). These were compared with 29 other patients treated with 45 Gy of pelvic external irradiation followed by a 24 Gy of bilateral ARC boost (RT) from October 1996 to February 2000. Some patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy. Three-year actuarial biochemical control rates (BC3) and pretreatment biochemical response predictors such as prostate-specific antigen pretreatment (PSAi), Gleason score (GS) and clinical stage (CS), were evaluated. RESULTS: Median follow-up was of 25 months for the RT group and 37 months for the BT group. BC3 was 51% versus 73% (p = 0.032) for RT and BT, respectively. Comparisons of biochemical control by treatment group stratified by PSAi showed that BC3 for RT versus BT was 85.7% versus 79.1% (p = 0.76) for PSAi 10 ng/mL, respectively. For patients with GS 6, BC3 was 78% versus 55% (p = 0.58) for RT versus BT, respectively. For patients with CS T2a, BC3 was 73% versus 69% (p = 0.692) for RT versus BT, respectively. The relative risk of biochemical relapse was 2.3 (95% IC: 1.0-5.1) for patients in RT group compared to the BT group. When adjusted for PSAi and GS, the relative risk of biochemical relapse was 2.4 (95% IC: 1.0-5.7). CONCLUSION: The treatment modality was an independent prognostic factor for biochemical relapse, with a significant improvement in the biochemical control with BT. These early results suggest that this treatment was most beneficial in patients with PSAi > 10 ng/mL, CS 10 ng/mL, respectivamente. Quando estratificado pelo EG, a SB3 para RT e BT foi de 37% e 80% (p = 0,001) para EG 6 (p = 0,58); estratificando-se pelo EC, a SB3 para RT e BT foi de 36% e 74% (p = 0,018) para EC T2a (p = 0,692), respectivamente. O risco relativo bruto de recidiva bioquímica foi de 2,3 (95% IC: 1,0-5,1) para os pacientes tratados com RT, em relação à BT; quando ajustado pelo PSAi e EG, o risco relativo de recidiva bioquímica foi de 2,4 (95% IC: 1,0-5,7). CONCLUSÃO: A modalidade de tratamento foi fator prognóstico independente de recidiva bioquímica, com maior controle bioquímico associado à BT. Nossos resultados preliminares sugerem que o maior benefício com BT foi obtido nos pacientes com PSAi > 10 ng/mL, EC < T2a e EG < 6.Hospital do Câncer A.C. Camargo Departamento de RadioterapiaUniversidade de São PauloHospital do Câncer A.C. Camargo Centro de EstudosUniversidade Metodista de Santos Faculdade de MedicinaHospital do Câncer A.C. CamargoUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) Escola Paulista de MedicinaFaculdade de Medicina de MaríliaUNIFESP, EPMSciEL