Obstetrics and Gynecology Emergency Department Activity during Lockdown in a Teaching Hospital, Hub Center, for COVID-19

Background. The lockdown related to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has imposed profound changes in the interaction of the population with hospitals and emergency departments. The main aim of this research was to evaluate the impact of lockdown on the activity of obstetrics and gynecology emergency department (OGED) in a teaching hospital, hub center, for COVID-19. Methods. The study considers all visits to the OGED with their different triage color codes that represent the clinical severity of each case (from the most severe to the least one: red, yellow, green, white). Data were selected through the "PSNet"triage program and collected anonymously. We analyzed frequency distributions of the variables separately for each woman and calculated mean and standard deviations for continuous variables. We then analyzed the association between factors and outcomes for categorical variables (expressed as a number and percentage of the total) using the chi-square test (χ2). The level of significance was established with p<0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics V20.0. Given the fact that the study has a retrospective observational nature and it is based on an anonymous routine database, approval by the Local Ethics Committee was not necessary. Results. The relative decrease of patients presenting to OGED in 2020 was -50.96%. The percentage of nonpregnant women was significantly lower in 2020 compared to 2019 (p≤0.0001; Δ = -79.46%). Regarding the obstetric group, we saw an important decrease of visits in 2020 compared to 2019 (p<0.0001; Δ = -40%). The prevalence of yellow codes was significantly higher in 2020 (Δ = +29.72%), while that of white (Δ = -61.58%) and green (Δ = -52.22%) codes was significantly lower (p≤0.0001). Comparing the diagnoses at discharge, we could highlight significant reductions in 2020 for more than one diagnosis: bleeding (p≤0.0001; Δ = -70.42%), pain (p≤0.0001; Δ = -81.22%), urinary diseases (p=0.004; Δ = -75.64%), and gastrointestinal diseases (p≤0.0001; Δ = -87.50%). Conclusions. An evident change emerged in relation to the dynamics between the local obstetrical and gynecological population, and OGED resources. The COVID-19 lockdown greatly reduced the rate of admission to OGED without time-related obstetric and gynecological complications. The reduction of admissions suggests a more appropriate use of the ED by patients that may inspire future policies for the implementation of emergency services

When more is not better: 10 'don'ts' in endometriosis management. An ETIC* position statement

41noETIC Endometriosis Treatment Italian ClubopenA network of endometriosis experts from 16 Italian academic departments and teaching hospitals distributed all over the country made a critical appraisal of the available evidence and definition of 10 suggestions regarding measures to be de-implemented. Strong suggestions were made only when high-quality evidence was available. The aim was to select 10 low-value medical interventions, characterized by an unfavorable balance between potential benefits, potential harms, and costs, which should be discouraged in women with endometriosis. The following suggestions were agreed by all experts: do not suggest laparoscopy to detect and treat superficial peritoneal endometriosis in infertile women without pelvic pain symptoms; do not recommend controlled ovarian stimulation and IUI in infertile women with endometriosis at any stage; do not remove small ovarian endometriomas (diameter &lt;4&nbsp;cm) with the sole objective of improving the likelihood of conception in infertile patients scheduled for IVF; do not remove uncomplicated deep endometriotic lesions in asymptomatic women, and also in symptomatic women not seeking conception when medical treatment is effective and well tolerated; do not systematically request second-level diagnostic investigations in women with known or suspected non-subocclusive colorectal endometriosis or with symptoms responding to medical treatment; do not recommend repeated follow-up serum CA-125 (or other currently available biomarkers) measurements in women successfully using medical treatments for uncomplicated endometriosis in the absence of suspicious ovarian cysts; do not leave women undergoing surgery for ovarian endometriomas and not seeking immediate conception without post-operative long-term treatment with estrogen-progestins or progestins; do not perform laparoscopy in adolescent women (&lt;20&nbsp;years) with moderate-severe dysmenorrhea and clinically suspected early endometriosis without prior attempting to relieve symptoms with estrogen-progestins or progestins; do not prescribe drugs that cannot be used for prolonged periods of time because of safety or cost issues as first-line medical treatment, unless estrogen-progestins or progestins have been proven ineffective, not tolerated, or contraindicated; do not use robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis outside research settings. Our proposal is to better address medical and surgical approaches to endometriosis de-implementing low-value interventions, with the aim to prevent unnecessary morbidity, limit psychological distress, and reduce the burden of treatment avoiding medical overuse and allowing a more equitable distribution of healthcare resources.openAlio, L; Angioni, S; Arena, S; Bartiromo, L; Bergamini, V; Berlanda, N; Bonin, C; Busacca, M; Candiani, M; Centini, G; D’Alterio, M N; Di Cello, A; Exacoustos, C; Fedele, L; Frattaruolo, M P; Incandela, D; Lazzeri, L; Luisi, S; Maiorana, A; Maneschi, F; Martire, F; Massarotti, C; Mattei, A; Muzii, L; Ottolina, J; Perandini, A; Perelli, F; Pino, I; Porpora, M G; Raimondo, D; Remorgida, V; Seracchioli, R; Solima, E; Somigliana, E; Sorrenti, G; Venturella, R; Vercellini, P; Viganó, P; Vignali, M; Zullo, F; Zupi, EAlio, L; Angioni, S; Arena, S; Bartiromo, L; Bergamini, V; Berlanda, N; Bonin, C; Busacca, M; Candiani, M; Centini, G; D’Alterio, M N; Di Cello, A; Exacoustos, C; Fedele, L; Frattaruolo, M P; Incandela, D; Lazzeri, L; Luisi, S; Maiorana, Anna; Maneschi, F; Martire, F; Massarotti, C; Mattei, A; Muzii, L; Ottolina, J; Perandini, A; Perelli, F; Pino, Ida; Porpora, M G; Raimondo, D; Remorgida, V; Seracchioli, R; Solima, E; Somigliana, E; Sorrenti, G; Venturella, R; Vercellini, P; Vigano', Paola; Vignali, M; Zullo, F; Zupi,

Tissue thermal damage caused by bipolar forceps can be reduced with a combination of plastic and metal

Background: We created a new 5-mm bipolar forceps. Thermo-insulating plastic was used for the creation of the jaws, while the metal conductor is buried deep inside the plastic. Methods: A porcine model was used in experimental testing against a standard metallic 5-mm bipolar forceps at three different wattage settings (20, 40, 60 W). Histological sections were evaluated by a pathologist who was blind to the wattage and instrument tested. Results: The new instrument was shown to cause statistically significant reduced thermal damage. In addition, its lateral thermal diffusion is superior to standard bipolar forceps. Conclusions: Thermo-insulating plastics can reduce thermal damage to tissue during electrosurgery