13 research outputs found

    COMMENT: MARINE RESERVES: WILL THEY ACCOMPLISH MORE WITH MANAGEMENT COSTS?

    Get PDF
    Hannesson (Marine Resource Economics 13(3) 1998) takes a critical approach to marine protected areas (MPAs) using simulations of MPAs combined with open access. His results show the conservation effect of an MPA of an appropriate size being the same as that achieved with optimal quota regulation, but with a smaller catch. We expand this analysis by adding a management cost function and increasing the fishing costs to a more realistic level. It is shown that the use of MPAs of certain sizes can be a more advantageous management tool than traditional quotas; hence, the inclusion of management costs modifies some of the findings of Hannesson (1998). We also illustrate how sensitive the results are to the choice of fishing cost values, making the attractiveness of private property versus marine reserves much less clear than proposed by Hannesson (1998).Resource /Energy Economics and Policy,

    Quotas, marine reserves and fishing the line. When does marine reserve creation pay?

    Get PDF
    This paper explores the issue of using marine reserves in combination with quotas as fisheries management tools using a patchy environment model as the biological foundation. The rent generated by fishing on the total population, using optimal quotas as a management tool, is compared to the rent from the fishery when managed with quotas and a marine reserve. This is done under different assumptions regarding the type of dispersal mechanisms between the sub-populations in the different patches and under two different assumptions regarding the harvest function. It is shown that the profitability of reserve creation depends on the migration rate relative to the intrinsic growth rate and the cost / price ratio and that the choice of harvesting function is of particular importance when the costs of fishing are high

    Productivity in organic and conventional salmon aquaculture

    Get PDF
    This report provides a comparative analysis of productivity in conventional and organic salmon aquaculture. Regulations in organic salmon farming impose several restrictions on production that are not present in conventional salmon farming. We have analysed the effect of a fish density regulation on the economic performance of salmon farms. A fish density regulation has two possible consequences. First, with a given cage volume, it leads to a reduction in total production at the farm. Second, it leads to an increase in costs per kilo produced. We undertook a linear programming analysis of a conventional salmon farm and organic salmon farms with open and closed cage systems. The results from the analysis indicated strongly that the economic performance is sensitive to the maximum fish density

    Bioeconomic Analysis of By-Catch of Juvenile Fish in the Shrimp Fisheries – an Evaluation of Management Procedures in the Barents Sea

    No full text
    A bioeconomic model on the management ofby-catch of juvenile fish in the shrimp fisheryin the Barents Sea and the Svalbard Zone,presented by the Norwegian Directorate ofFisheries to the Joint Norwegian RussianFisheries Commission in 1993, is evaluated. The model is based on management of by-catchthrough closure of areas when the by-catch ofjuvenile fish from commercially importantspecies exceeds a critical number. It isargued that although the model may prove usefulin bringing economic rationale into themanagement of by-catch, care must be taken whenstocks are in poor shape. This is illustratedby using the high mortality rates and low stocklevels experienced for cod and haddock in 2000,and which is expected for the next couple ofyears. It is therefore discussed when it isappropriate to use the model with reference tothe Code of Conduct provided by FAO in 1995. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2004by-catch, Code of Conduct, shrimp fisheries,

    Marine protected areas in a welfare-based perspective

    Get PDF
    Assuming a broad set of fisheries management goals, this paper analyzes the implementation of a marine protected area (MPA) together with open access outside, applying a bioeconomic model that ensures unchanged growth post-MPA. Taking into account that conservation and restoration, food security, employment and social surplus are amongst the objectives that many managers include in fisheries management, it is found that this broader welfare economic approach to MPAs may well recommend them to a greater degree than espoused in the more common resource rent focused studies carried out to date. It is shown that for overfished stocks, an MPA may yield resource protection, maximize harvests and increase consumer and producer surplus, as well as give higher employment. This, however, is less apparent for moderately overfished as well as highly migratory stocks. Resource protection and enhancement implicitly improves ecosystem services
    corecore