Pre-vaccination prevalence of anogenital and oral human papillomavirus in young HIV-infected men who have sex with men.

The aims of this study were to: 1) determine prevalence of anogenital and oral HPV, 2) determine concordance between HPV at anal, perianal, scrotal/penile, and oral sites; and 3) describe factors associated with anogenital HPV types targeted by the 9-valent vaccine. Data were collected from 2012 to 2015 among men who have sex with men 18-26 years of age enrolled in a vaccine trial (N = 145). Penile/scrotal, perianal, anal, and oral samples were tested for 61 HPV types. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with types in the 9-valent vaccine. Participants' mean age was 23.0 years, 55.2% were African-American, and 26.2% were Hispanic; 93% had anal, 40% penile, and 6% oral HPV. Among those with anogenital infection, 18% had HPV16. Concordance was low between anogenital and oral sites. Factors independently associated with a 9-valent vaccine-type HPV were: race (African-American vs. White, OR=2.67, 95% CI=1.11-6.42), current smoking (yes vs. no, OR=2.37, 95% CI=1.03-5.48), and number of recent receptive anal sex partners (2+ vs. 0, OR=3.47, 95% CI=1.16-10.4). Most MSM were not infected with HPV16 or HPV18, suggesting that they may still benefit from HPV vaccination, but anogenital HPV was very common, highlighting the importance of vaccinating men before sexual initiation. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT01209325

Less Bone Loss With Maraviroc- Versus Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study

Background. There is a need to prevent or minimize bone loss associated with antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation. We compared maraviroc (MVC)- to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)–containing ART

Pharmacokinetics of Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Among Transgender Adolescents and Young Adults Without HIV Receiving Gender Affirming Hormones.

The transgender community has expressed concerns regarding drug-drug interactions between HIV-pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) and gender-affirming hormones. In this study, we evaluated emtricitabine (F, FTC)/tenofovir (TFV) disoporoxil fumarate (TDF) pharmacokinetics (PK) among adolescent and young adult transgender persons receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT). This was a prospective, observational study among transgender women (TW) and men (TM) without HIV, 15-24 years of age, receiving GAHT (estradiol with/without spironolactone, or testosterone). Participants received 1 month of directly observed daily F/TDF. Weekly convenience blood samples were collected for plasma TFV and FTC, and intracellular TFV-diphosphate (TFV-DP) and FTC-triphosphate (FTC-TP) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and dried blood spots (DBS). After 2-3 weeks of F/TDF dosing, intensive PK sampling was conducted. PK parameters were estimated using noncompartmental methods. Data were log-transformed and compared between TM and TW, and to historical data among cisgender adults. Plasma TFV exposures were similar between TM and TW [geometric mean ratio (GMR); confidence interval (95% CI): 1.06 (0.89-1.28)], whereas FTC plasma exposures were 21% higher in TM versus TW (95% CI: 1.07-1.38). TFV-DP in PBMC and DBS and FTC-TP in DBS did not differ between TM versus TW after controlling for creatinine clearance (CrCl), but FTC-TP in PBMC remained 46% (95% CI: 1.15-1.86) higher in TM versus TW. All PK exposures were within expected ranges based on historical studies. TM had higher FTC exposures compared with TW, but overall plasma and intracellular exposures for both drugs were within the range of historical studies, suggesting high PrEP efficacy will be retained in adolescent and young adult transgender persons. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03652623)

Gender-Affirming Hormone Pharmacokinetics Among Adolescent and Young Adult Transgender Persons Receiving Daily Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

Transgender persons have an increased vulnerability to HIV infection yet have not been well-represented in past clinical trials for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Because of this, there are few data available to understand whether gender-affirming hormone concentrations are influenced by PrEP agents in transgender men (TM) and transgender women (TW). The objective of this study was to compare gender-affirming hormone concentrations with versus without emtricitabine (F, FTC)-tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). TM and TW without HIV, aged 15-24 years, were enrolled for 1 month of directly observed daily F/TDF. Participants were required to be receiving a stable hormone dose (estradiol or testosterone) for at least 1 month or three consecutive doses, whichever was longer, before enrollment and willing to continue the same dose. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling for gender-affirming hormones was collected before and 2-3 weeks after daily F/TDF. Serum estradiol and total testosterone were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; free testosterone by equilibrium dialysis. Maximum concentrations (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUClast) were log-transformed and compared between baseline and on F/TDF using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Twenty-five TW and 24 TM were enrolled (median age: 20 and 21 years, respectively). In TW, estradiol Cmax (GMR [95% CI]: 0.85 [0.65-1.11]) and AUClast (GMR [95% CI]: 0.87 [0.73-1.03]) were comparable on F/TDF versus baseline. In TM, similar comparability was observed for PrEP versus baseline including total testosterone Cmax (GMR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.80-1.03]) and AUClast (GMR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.81-1.04]) and free testosterone Cmax (GMR [95% CI]: 0.89 [0.74-1.07]) and AUClast (GMR [95% CI]: 0.88 [0.74-1.03]). Estradiol and testosterone exposures in young TW and TM did not significantly differ on F/TDF versus baseline. These findings should reassure patients and providers that F/TDF can be used as PrEP without concern for altering gender-affirming hormone PK. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03652623)

Qualitative study on the acceptability of and adherence to a vaginal ring for HIV prophylaxis among adolescent girls

Objective: This study aims to assess the product-related, relationship-related, and sex-related factors that act as facilitators and barriers to the acceptability of a vaginal ring (VR) for HIV prevention among adolescent girls. Design: Qualitative study. Methods: Ninety-six girls aged 15-17 years from 6 urban US sites were enrolled in MTN-023/IPM 030, a 24-week randomized controlled trial, for assessing the safety and acceptability of a dapivirine VR for HIV prevention. At week 24, 21 girls were randomly selected to participate in in-depth interviews. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and data analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Facilitators and barriers to VR acceptability related to participants\u27 relationships, sexual activity, and characteristics of the VR product were identified. Results: Factors related to relationships rarely seemed to act as barriers to VR acceptability; most participants disclosed VR use to sexual partners, and positive reactions from sexual partners, which were common, seemed to facilitate VR acceptability. Emotional and/or physical discomfort surrounding VR use during sex was mentioned occasionally as a barrier to VR acceptability. Product characteristics were most frequently mentioned as barriers to VR acceptability. Many participants reported concerns about the large size of the VR on first impression. Although most found the VR comfortable, some reported pain with VR insertion. Several participants were concerned about VR cleanliness, particularly during menstruation. Conclusion: Product considerations, specifically size and use during menstruation, were the most commonly reported barriers to VR acceptability in this study. Adolescent girls may require additional counseling to assuage product concerns regarding a VR for HIV prevention

Brief Report: Phase IIa Safety Study of a Vaginal Ring Containing Dapivirine in Adolescent Young Women.

BackgroundYoung women aged 15-24 years are disproportionately affected by the HIV epidemic. Two phase III trials of a vaginal ring containing 25-mg dapivirine demonstrated HIV-1 risk reduction in adult women older than 21 years but not in those aged 18-21 years. Lack of protection was correlated with low adherence.MethodsIn this phase-IIa, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, US, multicenter trial of the dapivirine ring in sexually active females, aged 15-17 years, participants were randomized 3:1 to a dapivirine or placebo ring to be inserted monthly for 6 months (NCT02028338). Primary safety end points included grade 2 product related adverse events and any grade 3 and higher adverse events. Adherence to ring use was assessed by plasma dapivirine concentrations, residual levels in used rings, and self-report. A plasma dapivirine concentration of >95 pg/mL was used to define short-term adherence; a residual ring level of <23.5 mg was used to define long-term adherence. Acceptability was assessed through computer-assisted self-interviews.ResultsNinety-six participants were enrolled across 6 US sites. The median age was 16.0 years. There were no differences in safety outcomes between treatment arms. Adherence to the dapivirine ring was demonstrated by both plasma measurements (87%) and residual drug levels in rings (95%). Forty-two percent (95% confidence interval: 32 to 52) of participants reported that they never removed the ring. Participants noted no discomfort due to the ring at 87% of visits and "liking" the ring at 93% of visits.ConclusionThe dapivirine vaginal ring, a promising topical microbicide, was well tolerated and acceptable in young US adolescents

High prevalence of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, and prevention through human papillomavirus vaccination, in young men who have sex with men living with HIV.

BackgroundMen who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for HPV-related anal cancer. Little is known about the prevalence of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) and the anal cancer precursor, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL), among young MSM living with HIV (MSMLWH). HPV vaccination is recommended in this group but its safety, immunogenicity and protection against vaccine-type HPV infection and associated LSIL/HSIL have not been studied.Methods260 MSMLWH 18-26 years-old were screened at 17 U.S. sites for a clinical trial of the quadrivalent (HPV6/11/16/18) HPV (qHPV) vaccine. Those without HSIL were vaccinated at 0, 2, and 6 months. Cytology, high-resolution anoscopy with biopsies of lesions, serology, and HPV testing of the mouth/penis/scrotum/anus/perianus, were performed at screening/month 0, and months 7, 12 and 24.ResultsAmong 260 MSMLWH screened, the most common reason for exclusion was detection of HSIL, in 88/260 (34%). 144 MSMLWH were enrolled. 47% of enrollees were previously exposed to HPV 16. No incident qHPV type-associated anal LSIL/HSIL was detected among men naïve to that type, compared with 11.1, 2.2, 4.5, and 2.8 cases/100 person-years for HPV 6/11/16/18-associated LSIL/HSIL, respectively, among those previously exposed to that type. qHPV was immunogenic and safe with no vaccine-associated serious adverse events.Conclusions18-26 year-old MSMLWH naïve to qHPV vaccine types were protected against incident qHPV type-associated LSIL/HSIL. Given their high prevalence of HSIL there is an urgent need to vaccinate young MSMLWH prior to exposure to vaccine HPV types, before initiating sexual activity, and to perform catch-up vaccination

Efficacy, safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of long-acting injectable cabotegravir for HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis in transgender women: a secondary analysis of the HPTN 083 trial

The HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 083 trial showed that long-acting injectable cabotegravir was more effective than tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine in preventing HIV in cisgender men and transgender women who have sex with men. We aimed to characterise the cohort of transgender women included in HPTN 083.HPTN 083 is an ongoing, phase 2b/3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy clinical trial done at 43 sites in seven countries (Argentina, Brazil, Peru, the USA, South Africa, Thailand, and Viet Nam). HIV-negative participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive injectable cabotegravir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine. The study design and primary outcomes of the blinded phase of HPTN 083 have already been reported. An enrolment minimum of 10% transgender women was set for the trial. Here we characterise the cohort of transgender women enrolled from Dec 6, 2016, to May 14, 2020, when the study was unblinded. We report sociodemographic characteristics, use of gender affirming hormone therapy, and behavioural assessments of the transgender women participants. Laboratory testing and safety evaluations are also reported. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02720094.HPTN 083 enrolled 570 transgender women (304 tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine; 266 injectable cabotegravir). Transgender women were primarily from Asia (225 [39%]) and Latin America (205 [36%]); 330 (58%) reported using gender affirming hormone therapy. Intimate partner violence was common (270 [47%] reported emotional abuse and 172 [30%] reported physical abuse) and 323 (57%) reported a history of childhood sexual abuse. 159 (28%) transgender women disagreed that they were at risk for HIV, and 142 (25%) screened positive for depressive symptoms. During study follow-up, incidence of syphilis was 16·25% (95% CI 13·28–19·69), rectal gonorrhoea was 11·66% (9·14–14·66), and chlamydia was 20·61% (17·20–24·49). Frequency of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups. Nine seroconversions occurred among transgender women during the blinded phase of the study (seven in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine group and two in the injectable cabotegravir group); overall incidence was 1·19 per 100 person-years (95% CI 0·54–2·25): 1·80 per 100 person-years (0·73–3·72) in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus emtricitabine group and 0·54 per 100 person-years (0·07–1·95) in the injectable cabotegravir group (hazard ratio 0·34 [95% CI 0·08–1·56]). Cabotegravir concentrations did not differ by gender affirming hormone therapy use.HIV prevention strategies for transgender women cannot be addressed separately from social and structural vulnerabilities. Transgender women were well represented in HPTN 083 and should continue to be prioritised in HIV prevention studies. Our results suggest that injectable cabotegravir is a safe and effective pre-exposure prophylaxis option for transgender women.National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and ViiV Healthcare