Involvement of GABAergic mechanisms of the dorsal periaqueductal gray and inferior colliculus on unconditioned fear

The fact that the dorsal periaqueductal gray (dPAG) and inferior colliculus (IC), together with superior colliculus, medial hypothalamus and amygdala, constitute the brain aversion system has been well-established. Stepwise increases in the intensity of electrical stimulation of dPAG or IC cause freezing and escape responses, which are followed by a freezing behavior that lasts after the interruption of the stimulation. Freezing and escape are unconditioned defensive behaviors derived from the stimulation of the output centers for the defense reaction, whereas the post-stimulation freezing is the behavioral counterpart of the processing of aversive information. Although GABA-A mechanisms of the midbrain tectum exert a tonic inhibitory influence on the neural substrates of unconditioned fear, their influence on the processing of aversive information is not completely understood. Thus, the present study examines the effects of injections of the GABA-A receptor agonist muscimol (1 and 2 nmol/0.2 µL) or the glutamic acid decarboxylase blocker semicarbazide (5 and 7.5 µg/0.2 µL) into dPAG or IC of Wistar rats on freezing and escape thresholds determined by electrical stimulation of these same structures and on post-stimulation freezing. Intra-dPAG injections of muscimol increased and semicarbazide decreased the freezing and escape thresholds of electrical stimulation of the dPAG. Only semicarbazide enhanced the dPAG post-stimulation freezing. Intra-IC injections of muscimol significantly increased aversive thresholds, while having no effect on IC post-stimulation freezing. Intra-IC injections of semicarbazide had no significant effects. These findings suggest that GABAergic mechanisms are important regulators of the expression of unconditioned fear in dPAG and IC, whereas only in dPAG GABA appears to play a role on the sensory gating towards aversive information during post-stimulation freezing.FAPESPCNP

Desenhando as novas fronteiras para a compreensão do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo: uma revisão de sua relação com o medo e a ansiedade

Anxiety is an important component of the psychopathology of the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). So far, most interventions that have proven to be effective for treating OCD are similar to those developed for other anxiety disorders. However, neurobiological studies of OCD came to conclusions that are not always compatible with those previously associated with other anxiety disorders. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to review the degree of overlap between OCD and other anxiety disorders phenomenology and pathophysiology to support the rationale that guides research in this field. RESULTS: Clues about the neurocircuits involved in the manifestation of anxiety disorders have been obtained through the study of animal anxiety models, and structural and functional neuroimaging in humans. These investigations suggest that in OCD, in addition to dysfunction in cortico-striatal pathways, the functioning of an alternative neurocircuitry, which involves amygdalo-cortical interactions and participates in fear conditioning and extinction processes, may be impaired. CONCLUSION: It is likely that anxiety is a relevant dimension of OCD that impacts on other features of this disorder. Therefore, future studies may benefit from the investigation of the expression of fear and anxiety by OCD patients according to their type of obsessions and compulsions, age of OCD onset, comorbidities, and patterns of treatment response

Involvement of GABAergic mechanisms of the dorsal periaqueductal gray and inferior colliculus in conditioned and unconditioned fear

A substância cinzenta periaquedutal dorsal (SCPd) e o colículo inferior (CI) são duas estruturas do teto mesencefálico que, juntamente com a amígdala, o hipotálamo dorsomedial e o colículo superior, estão envolvidas na modulação da expressão comportamental dos estados de medo. A estimulação química ou elétrica destas estruturas produz uma série de respostas comportamentais defensivas. Além disso, dados comportamentais com modelos animais de ansiedade têm fornecido evidências da existência de uma regulação inibitória tônica GABAérgica na SCPd e CI. Neste estudo investigamos o envolvimento da neurotransmissão GABAérgica na expressão do medo condicionado e do medo incondicionado. Para isso, os efeitos da administração de muscimol (agonista GABA-A) e semicarbazida (inibidor da descarboxilase do ácido glutâmico) na SCPd e CI foram analisados no teste do sobressalto potencializado pelo medo, na resposta de congelamento condicionada, nos limiares de congelamento e fuga determinados por estimulação elétrica dessas estruturas e no congelamento pós-estimulação. No modelo de medo incondicionado, microinjeções de muscimol intra-SCPd reduziram a aversividade da estimulação elétrica, mas não o congelamento pós-estimulação, ao passo que a semicarbazida produziu efeitos pró-aversivos em ambas as condições. O muscimol também causou redução significativa no sobressalto potencializado pelo medo e congelamento condicionado, enquanto que a semicarbazida não alterou essas respostas. Já a microinjeção de ambas as drogas no CI não produziu efeitos no modelo condicionado, mas no teste incondicionado, o muscimol reduziu a aversividade da estimulação elétrica. Esses dados mostram uma participação diferencial de mecanismos GABAérgicos no medo condicionado e incondicionado. Estes mecanismos na SCPd parecem estar envolvidos tanto no medo condicionado quanto no incondicionado, enquanto que no CI eles parecem participar somente do medo incondicionado.The dorsal periqueductal gray (dPAG) and inferior colliculus (IC) are two structures of the midbrain tectum that, together with amygdala, dorsomedial hypothalamus and superior colliculus, are involved in the modulation of the expression of fear-related behaviors. The chemical or electrical stimulation of these structures produces a series of behavioral defensive responses. Moreover, behavioral data from animal models of anxiety have provided evidences of tonic inhibitory GABAergic regulation in dPAG and IC. This study investigated the involvement of GABAergic neurotransmission in the expression of unconditioned and conditioned fear. To this aim, the effects of intra-dPAG and IC administration of muscimol (GABA-A agonist) and semicarbazide (glutamic acid decarboxylase inhibitor) were examined in the fear potentiated startle test, in conditioned freezing, in the thresholds for freezing and escape determined by electrical stimulation of these structures, and in the post-stimulation freezing. In the unconditioned model, intra-dPAG injections of muscimol reduced the aversiveness of the electrical stimulation but had no effects on the post-stimulation freezing, while semicarbazide produced aversive-like effects in both conditions. Muscimol also caused significant reduction in fear potentiated startle and conditioned freezing, while semicarbazide had no effect in these responses. In contrast, intra-IC injections of both drugs were ineffective in the conditioned model. In the unconditioned model, however, muscimol reduced the aversiveness of the electrical stimulation. These data show a differential participation of GABAergic mechanisms on conditioned and unconditioned fear. These mechanisms in the dPAG seem to be involved in both conditioned and unconditioned fear, while in IC they seem to participate in unconditioned fear only

Involvement of GABAergic mechanisms of the dorsal periaqueductal gray and inferior colliculus in conditioned and unconditioned fear

A substância cinzenta periaquedutal dorsal (SCPd) e o colículo inferior (CI) são duas estruturas do teto mesencefálico que, juntamente com a amígdala, o hipotálamo dorsomedial e o colículo superior, estão envolvidas na modulação da expressão comportamental dos estados de medo. A estimulação química ou elétrica destas estruturas produz uma série de respostas comportamentais defensivas. Além disso, dados comportamentais com modelos animais de ansiedade têm fornecido evidências da existência de uma regulação inibitória tônica GABAérgica na SCPd e CI. Neste estudo investigamos o envolvimento da neurotransmissão GABAérgica na expressão do medo condicionado e do medo incondicionado. Para isso, os efeitos da administração de muscimol (agonista GABA-A) e semicarbazida (inibidor da descarboxilase do ácido glutâmico) na SCPd e CI foram analisados no teste do sobressalto potencializado pelo medo, na resposta de congelamento condicionada, nos limiares de congelamento e fuga determinados por estimulação elétrica dessas estruturas e no congelamento pós-estimulação. No modelo de medo incondicionado, microinjeções de muscimol intra-SCPd reduziram a aversividade da estimulação elétrica, mas não o congelamento pós-estimulação, ao passo que a semicarbazida produziu efeitos pró-aversivos em ambas as condições. O muscimol também causou redução significativa no sobressalto potencializado pelo medo e congelamento condicionado, enquanto que a semicarbazida não alterou essas respostas. Já a microinjeção de ambas as drogas no CI não produziu efeitos no modelo condicionado, mas no teste incondicionado, o muscimol reduziu a aversividade da estimulação elétrica. Esses dados mostram uma participação diferencial de mecanismos GABAérgicos no medo condicionado e incondicionado. Estes mecanismos na SCPd parecem estar envolvidos tanto no medo condicionado quanto no incondicionado, enquanto que no CI eles parecem participar somente do medo incondicionado.The dorsal periqueductal gray (dPAG) and inferior colliculus (IC) are two structures of the midbrain tectum that, together with amygdala, dorsomedial hypothalamus and superior colliculus, are involved in the modulation of the expression of fear-related behaviors. The chemical or electrical stimulation of these structures produces a series of behavioral defensive responses. Moreover, behavioral data from animal models of anxiety have provided evidences of tonic inhibitory GABAergic regulation in dPAG and IC. This study investigated the involvement of GABAergic neurotransmission in the expression of unconditioned and conditioned fear. To this aim, the effects of intra-dPAG and IC administration of muscimol (GABA-A agonist) and semicarbazide (glutamic acid decarboxylase inhibitor) were examined in the fear potentiated startle test, in conditioned freezing, in the thresholds for freezing and escape determined by electrical stimulation of these structures, and in the post-stimulation freezing. In the unconditioned model, intra-dPAG injections of muscimol reduced the aversiveness of the electrical stimulation but had no effects on the post-stimulation freezing, while semicarbazide produced aversive-like effects in both conditions. Muscimol also caused significant reduction in fear potentiated startle and conditioned freezing, while semicarbazide had no effect in these responses. In contrast, intra-IC injections of both drugs were ineffective in the conditioned model. In the unconditioned model, however, muscimol reduced the aversiveness of the electrical stimulation. These data show a differential participation of GABAergic mechanisms on conditioned and unconditioned fear. These mechanisms in the dPAG seem to be involved in both conditioned and unconditioned fear, while in IC they seem to participate in unconditioned fear only

Involvement of glutamatergic mechanisms of the dorsal periaqueductal gray matter and medial hypothalamus in conditioned fear to the light

A substância cinzenta periaquedutal dorsal (dPAG) e o hipotálamo medial (MH) são duas estruturas encefálicas que estão envolvidas na elaboração de estados aversivos e expressão de respostas defensivas. A estimulação elétrica da dPAG ou do MH produz uma série de respostas comportamentais que se assemelham às respostas defensivas induzidas pela presença de um predador. Esses mesmos comportamentos podem ser eliciados com a microinjeção local de agonistas glutamatérgicos nessas estruturas, indicando o envolvimento de aminoácidos excitatórios na expressão das respostas defensivas incondicionadas. Apesar disso, a participação destas estruturas no medo condicionado ainda é pouco conhecida. Assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar o envolvimento da mediação glutamatérgica da dPAG e de núcleos do MH núcleo anterior (AH) e núcleo pré-mamilar dorsal (PMd) na expressão do medo condicionado à luz. Para isso, foram avaliados os efeitos de agonistas e antagonistas glutamatérgicos (AMPA/Cainato e NMDA) administrados nessas estruturas no teste do sobressalto potencializado pelo medo (SPM) e na medida de congelamento condicionado. Ratos Wistar machos com cânulas-guias implantadas na dPAG, AH ou PMd foram submetidos ao condicionamento aversivo (pareamentos luz+choque). Vinte e quatro horas depois, esses animais receberam injeções intra-dPAG, AH ou PMd de NMDA ou ácido caínico (agonistas NMDA e AMPA/Cainato, respectivamente) ou AP7 ou NBQX (antagonistas NMDA e AMPA/Cainato, respectivamente) e foram submetidos ao teste do SPM. A resposta de congelamento condicionado foi avaliada na mesma sessão. Eventuais alterações motoras foram avaliadas no teste do campo aberto. A administração dos agonistas glutamatérgicos na dPAG promoveu efeitos pró-aversivos no SPM e congelamento condicionado. NBQX sozinho não produziu nenhum efeito significativo, ao passo que o AP7 diminuiu somente o congelamento condicionado. Entretanto, ambos os antagonistas bloquearam os efeitos dos respectivos agonistas. Já a administração dos agonistas e antagonistas glutamatérgicos no AH e PMd, em doses que não afetaram a atividade motora, não produziu efeitos significativos na resposta de congelamento condicionado e SPM. Os presentes resultados sugerem a participação de aminoácidos excitatórios da dPAG, mas não do MH, na expressão do medo condicionado à luz.The dorsal periaqueductal gray matter (dPAG) and the medial hypothalamus (MH) are two brain structures that are involved in the elaboration of aversive states and expression of defensive responses. Electrical stimulation of the dPAG or MH produces a series of behavioral responses that resemble those defensive responses triggered in the presence of a predator. These same behaviors can be elicited with the local microinjection of glutamate agonists into these structures, indicating the involvement of excitatory amino acids in the expression of unconditioned fear responses. Nevertheless, the involvement of these structures in fear conditioning is still unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the involvement of glutamatergic mediation of the dPAG and MH nuclei anterior nucleus (AH) and dorsal pre-mammillary nucleus (PMd) in the expression of conditioned fear to the light. Thus, we evaluated the effects of glutamatergic agonists and antagonists (AMPA/Kainate and NMDA) administered into these structures in fear potentiated startle (FPS) and conditioned freezing responses to the light. Male Wistar rats with guide-cannulae implanted in the dPAG, AH or PMd were subjected to aversive conditioning (light+shock pairings). Twenty-four hours later, the animals were injected intra-dPAG, AH or PMd with NMDA or kainic acid (NMDA and AMPA/Kainate agonists, respectively) or AP7 or NBQX (NMDA and AMPA/Kainate antagonists, respectively) and were subjected to the FPS test. The conditioned freezing response was measured in the same session. Potential motor effects were evaluated with the open-field test. The administration of glutamate agonists into the dPAG promoted pro-aversive effects in the FPS and conditioned freezing. NBQX produced no significant effect per se, whereas AP7 only decreased conditioned freezing. Both antagonists blocked the effects of the respective agonist. On the other hand, the administration of glutamatergic agonists and antagonists into AH and PMd, in doses that did not affect motor activity, produced no significant effects on conditioned fear responses. The present results suggest the involvement of mechanisms mediated by excitatory amino acids of the dPAG, but not of the MH, in the expression of conditioned fear responses to light

Conditioned fear is modulated by D(2) receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and basolateral amygdala

Excitation of the mesocorticolimbic pathway, originating from dopaminergic neurons in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), may be important for the development of exaggerated fear responding. Among the forebrain regions innervated by this pathway, the amygdala is an essential component of the neural circuitry of conditioned fear. The functional role of the dopaminergic pathway connecting the VIA to the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in fear and anxiety has received little attention. In vivo microdialysis was performed to measure dopamine levels in the BLA of Wistar rats that received the dopamine D(2) agonist quinpirole (1 mu g/0.2 mu l) into the VTA and were subjected to a fear conditioning test using a light as the conditioned stimulus (CS). The effects of intra-BLA injections of the D(1) antagonist SCH 23390 (1 and 2 mu g/0.2 mu l) and D(2) antagonist sulpiride (1 and 2 mu g/0.2 mu l) on fear-potentiated startle (FPS) to a light-CS were also assessed. Locomotor performance was evaluated by use of open-field and rotarod tests. Freezing and increased dopamine levels in the BLA in response to the CS were both inhibited by intra-VTA quinpirole. Whereas intra-BLA SCH 23390 did not affect FPS, intra-BLA sulpiride (2 mu g) inhibited FPS. Sulpiride`s ability to decrease FPS cannot be attributed to nonspecific effects because this drug did not affect motor performance. These findings indicate that the dopamine D(2) receptor pathway connecting the ventral tegmental area and the basolateral amygdala modulates fear and anxiety and may be a novel pharmacological target for the treatment of anxiety. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.FAPESP[06/06354-5]CNPq[472029/2006-0]Deutsche Forschungsgemeischaft (DFG)[DFG DE 792/2-4

Desenhando as novas fronteiras para a compreensão do transtorno obsessivo-compulsivo: uma revisão de sua relação com o medo e a ansiedade

Anxiety is an important component of the psychopathology of the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). So far, most interventions that have proven to be effective for treating OCD are similar to those developed for other anxiety disorders. However, neurobiological studies of OCD came to conclusions that are not always compatible with those previously associated with other anxiety disorders. Objectives: The aim of this study is to review the degree of overlap between OCD and other anxiety disorders phenomenology and pathophysiology to support the rationale that guides research in this field. Results: Clues about the neurocircuits involved in the manifestation of anxiety disorders have been obtained through the study of animal anxiety models, and structural and functional neuroimaging in humans. These investigations suggest that in OCD, in addition to dysfunction in cortico-striatal pathways, the functioning of an alternative neurocircuitry, which involves amygdalo-cortical interactions and participates in fear conditioning and extinction processes, may be impaired. Conclusion: It is likely that anxiety is a relevant dimension of OCD that impacts on other features of this disorder. Therefore, future studies may benefit from the investigation of the expression of fear and anxiety by OCD patients according to their type of obsessions and compulsions, age of OCD onset, comorbidities, and patterns of treatment response.Global Research Awards for Nicotine Dependence (GRAND) from Pfizer U.S.Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Filosofia Ciencias & Letras Ribeirao Preto, Lab Psicobiol, BR-14049 Ribeirao Preto, BrazilInst Neurosci & Behav, Ribeirao Preto, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psychiat, Interdisciplinary Lab Clin Neurosci LiNC, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Hosp Clin, Dept & Inst Psychiat, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo UNIFESP, Dept Psychiat, Interdisciplinary Lab Clin Neurosci LiNC, Sao Paulo, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Strategies and performance of the CMS silicon tracker alignment during LHC Run 2

The strategies for and the performance of the CMS silicon tracking system alignment during the 2015–2018 data-taking period of the LHC are described. The alignment procedures during and after data taking are explained. Alignment scenarios are also derived for use in the simulation of the detector response. Systematic effects, related to intrinsic symmetries of the alignment task or to external constraints, are discussed and illustrated for different scenarios