Differential Impact of Tetratricopeptide Repeat Proteins on the Steroid Hormone Receptors

Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif containing co-chaperones of the chaperone Hsp90 are considered control modules that govern activity and specificity of this central folding platform. Steroid receptors are paradigm clients of Hsp90. The influence of some TPR proteins on selected receptors has been described, but a comprehensive analysis of the effects of TPR proteins on all steroid receptors has not been accomplished yet.We compared the influence of the TPR proteins FK506 binding proteins 51 and 52, protein phosphatase-5, C-terminus of Hsp70 interacting protein, cyclophillin 40, hepatitis-virus-B X-associated protein-2, and tetratricopeptide repeat protein-2 on all six steroid hormone receptors in a homogeneous mammalian cell system. To be able to assess each cofactor's effect on the transcriptional activity of on each steroid receptor we employed transient transfection in a reporter gene assay. In addition, we evaluated the interactions of the TPR proteins with the receptors and components of the Hsp90 chaperone heterocomplex by coimmunoprecipitation. In the functional assays, corticosteroid and progesterone receptors displayed the most sensitive and distinct reaction to the TPR proteins. Androgen receptor's activity was moderately impaired by most cofactors, whereas the Estrogen receptors' activity was impaired by most cofactors only to a minor degree. Second, interaction studies revealed that the strongly receptor-interacting co-chaperones were all among the inhibitory proteins. Intriguingly, the TPR-proteins also differentially co-precipitated the heterochaperone complex components Hsp90, Hsp70, and p23, pointing to differences in their modes of action.The results of this comprehensive study provide important insight into chaperoning of diverse client proteins via the combinatorial action of (co)-chaperones. The differential effects of the TPR proteins on steroid receptors bear on all physiological processes related to steroid hormone activity

Differential interaction of TPR-proteins with AR heterocomplexes.

<p>HEK-293 cells were transfected as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>, except that HA-MR was expressed instead of HA-GR. Cells were processed and protein interactions were analyzed also as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. In A, binding of TPR-proteins is presented relative to the mean of the normalized FLAG-eluate signals of CHIP, FKBP51, and TPR2. Quantification represents means of three independent experiments (two for XAP2) +S.E.M. In B, binding is normalized as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. C, FLAG- and HA-immunoblot signals of the cell extracts, demonstrating expression of TPR proteins and AR. Quantifications represent means of three independent experiments +S.E.M.</p

Cyp 40 is unable to compete the inhibitory effect of FKBP51.

<p>SK-N-MC cells were transfected with the MMTV-Luc reporter plasmid, the Gaussia-KDEL control plasmid, one of the plasmids expressing the HA-tagged GR or MR as indicated, and plasmids expressing FKBP51 and Cyp40 at the indicated amounts. After transfection, the cells were cultivated for 24 h in the presence of 10 nM cortisol (A) or 0.03 nM Fludrocortisol (B). Bar graphs indicate the relative reporter activity representing Firefly measurements normalized to Gaussia activities and presented as relative stimulation + S.E.M. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. Lower panel of A displays immunoblots of cell extracts, probed with HA antibody demonstrating GR expression and the same membrane probed with FLAG antibody to detect overexpressed FKBP51 and Cyp40, and actin as control. In addition, antibodies directed against FKBP51 or Cyp40 were used to visualize the combined levels of endogenous and ectopic TPR protein.</p

Loss of FKBP52 affects GR responsiveness to cortisol.

<p>FKBP52-KO MEF cells (open symbols) or WT MEF cells (closed circles) were transfected with the MMTV-Luc reporter plasmid, the Gaussia-KDEL control plasmid, a plasmid expressing the HA-tagged mGR and either a plasmid expressing FLAG-tagged FKBP52 (+ect.52) or empty vector. After transfection, cells were cultivated for 24 h in the presence of hormone. Relative receptor activity represents firefly data normalized to Gaussia activities and is presented relative to the activity at saturating 300 nM corticosterone +S.E.M. of three independent experiments, each performed in triplicates. Significance of different receptor activation between FKBP52 KO cells and FKBP52 KO cells ectopically expressing FLAG-tagged FKBP52 was evaluated by one sampled T-test (* denotes <i>p</i>-values ≤0.001).</p

Response of steroid hormone receptors in MMTV-reporter gene assays.

<p>Neuronal SK-N-MC cells were transfected with a plasmid expressing one of the HA-tagged SRs, the MMTV firefly-luciferase reporter plasmid when transfecting GR, MR, PR, or AR, an ERE firefly-luciferase reporter plasmid for ERα and ERβ, and the Gaussia-KDEL control plasmid. After transfection, the cells were cultivated for 24 h in the presence of the indicated concentrations of hormone (DHT: Dihydrotestosterone) or EtOH as solvent control. Receptor activity represents firefly data normalized to Gaussia activities + S.E.M. of at least four independent experiments, each performed in duplicate.</p

PR, AR, ERα and ERβ activities in the presence of different TPR proteins.

<p>SK-N-MC cells were transfected with the MMTV-Luc (for PR and AR assays), or the ERE-Luc reporter plasmid (for ERα and ERβ assays), the Gaussia-KDEL control plasmid, a plasmid expressing the HA-tagged steroid hormone receptor as indicated and the plasmid expressing a FLAG-tagged TPR-protein. After transfection, cells were cultivated for 24 h in the presence of hormone as indicated. Relative receptor activity represents firefly data normalized to Gaussia activities and presented as relative stimulation to control + S.E.M. of at least four independent experiments performed in duplicate. Control cells were transfected with cloning plasmid replacing the TPR protein expression plasmid in the transfection mixture. Lower panels of A–D display immunoblots of cell extracts, probed with anti-HA antibody visualizing steroid receptor expression, the same membrane probed with FLAG antibody demonstrating expression of the TPR proteins and with actin antibody as loading control. * denotes <i>p</i>-values ≤0.001.</p

Differential interaction of TPR-proteins with MR heterocomplexes.

<p>HEK-293 cells were transfected as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>, except that HA-MR was expressed instead of HA-GR. Cells were processed and protein interactions were analyzed also as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. In A, binding of TPR-proteins is presented relative to the mean of the normalized FLAG-eluate signals of CHIP, FKBP51, FKBP52 and PP5. Quantification represents means of three independent experiments (two for TPR2) +S.E.M.. In B, binding is normalized as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. C, FLAG- and HA-immunoblot signals of the cell extracts, demonstrating expression of TPR proteins and MR. Quantifications represent means of three independent experiments +S.E.M.</p

TPR cofactors differentially recruit components of the multichaperone heterocomplex.

<p>HEK cells were transfected and TPR cofactors immunoprecipitated as described in the legends to <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figures 7</a>–<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g008" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g009" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g010" target="_blank">10</a>. The relative amounts of the precipitated TPR cofactors, the co-precipitated Hsp70 and Hsp90 were determined by densitometry of a coomassie stained gel of the eluates (A, upper panel), and the relative amount of p23 by densitometry of the immunoblot signals (A, lower panel). B and D, quantification of the relative binding of co-precipitated Hsp90 (B) and Hsp70 (D). Hsp90 signals and Hsp70 signals (only intensities above background binding were taken into consideration) were normalized to signals of the respective precipitated TPR cofactors. Data are presented as relative binding + S.E.M. of at least 12 independent experiments with different steroid receptors. C, quantification of the relative binding of co-precipitated p23. The p23 immunoblot signals were related (normalized) to the respective TPR cofactor signal. Binding of p23 is presented relative to the mean of the normalized p23 eluate signals of the complete set of TPR-proteins.</p

Differential interaction of TPR-proteins with PR heterocomplexes.

<p>HEK-293 cells were transfected as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>, except that HA-MR was expressed instead of HA-GR. Cells were processed and protein interactions were analyzed also as described for <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. In A, binding of TPR-proteins is presented relative to the mean of the normalized FLAG-eluate signals of CHIP, FKBP52, PP5 and TPR2. Quantification represents means of three independent experiments (two for FKBP51) +S.E.M. In B, binding is normalized as in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0011717#pone-0011717-g007" target="_blank">figure 7</a>. C, FLAG- and HA-immunoblot signals of the cell extracts, demonstrating expression of TPR proteins and PR. Quantifications represent means of three independent experiments +S.E.M.</p